啮齿类动物骨骼肌的多尺度被动力学表征

IF 5.6 4区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Irbm Pub Date : 2023-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.irbm.2023.100800
Philippe Pouletaut , Yoann Tatarenko , Mashhour K. Chakouch , Meng Li , Venus Joumaa , John R. Hawse , Walter Herzog , Simon Chatelin , Sabine F. Bensamoun
{"title":"啮齿类动物骨骼肌的多尺度被动力学表征","authors":"Philippe Pouletaut ,&nbsp;Yoann Tatarenko ,&nbsp;Mashhour K. Chakouch ,&nbsp;Meng Li ,&nbsp;Venus Joumaa ,&nbsp;John R. Hawse ,&nbsp;Walter Herzog ,&nbsp;Simon Chatelin ,&nbsp;Sabine F. Bensamoun","doi":"10.1016/j.irbm.2023.100800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To experimentally measure selected passive properties of skeletal muscle<span> at three different scales (macroscopic scale: whole muscle, microscopic scale: single skinned fiber, and submicron scale: single myofibril) within the same animal model (mice), and to compare a primarily slow-twitch fiber muscle (soleus) and a primarily fast-twitch fiber muscle (extensor digitorum longus, EDL) for each scale.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Healthy 3 months old wild-type C57BL6 mice were used. To characterize each scale, soleus (N = 11), EDL (N = 9), slow fibers (N = 17), fast fibers (N = 16), and myofibrils from soleus (N = 11) and EDL (N = 11) were harvested. Passive mechanical (ramp, relaxation) tests were applied at each scale to compare the passive properties (Young's modulus, static and dynamic stresses) within a given scale, across scales and between muscle types.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The soleus and EDL showed significant passive mechanical differences at the macroscopic scale while no variation was observed between both tissues at the microscopic and submicron scales. The results highlight the importance of the scale that is used to mechanically characterize a multiscale tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present work will allow for a better understanding of the multiscale passive mechanical properties for two muscles with vastly differing physiological and metabolic properties. This study provides referent data to the body of literature that can be built upon in future work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14605,"journal":{"name":"Irbm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiscale Passive Mechanical Characterization of Rodent Skeletal Muscle\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Pouletaut ,&nbsp;Yoann Tatarenko ,&nbsp;Mashhour K. Chakouch ,&nbsp;Meng Li ,&nbsp;Venus Joumaa ,&nbsp;John R. Hawse ,&nbsp;Walter Herzog ,&nbsp;Simon Chatelin ,&nbsp;Sabine F. Bensamoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irbm.2023.100800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To experimentally measure selected passive properties of skeletal muscle<span> at three different scales (macroscopic scale: whole muscle, microscopic scale: single skinned fiber, and submicron scale: single myofibril) within the same animal model (mice), and to compare a primarily slow-twitch fiber muscle (soleus) and a primarily fast-twitch fiber muscle (extensor digitorum longus, EDL) for each scale.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Healthy 3 months old wild-type C57BL6 mice were used. To characterize each scale, soleus (N = 11), EDL (N = 9), slow fibers (N = 17), fast fibers (N = 16), and myofibrils from soleus (N = 11) and EDL (N = 11) were harvested. Passive mechanical (ramp, relaxation) tests were applied at each scale to compare the passive properties (Young's modulus, static and dynamic stresses) within a given scale, across scales and between muscle types.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The soleus and EDL showed significant passive mechanical differences at the macroscopic scale while no variation was observed between both tissues at the microscopic and submicron scales. The results highlight the importance of the scale that is used to mechanically characterize a multiscale tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present work will allow for a better understanding of the multiscale passive mechanical properties for two muscles with vastly differing physiological and metabolic properties. This study provides referent data to the body of literature that can be built upon in future work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irbm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irbm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1959031823000490\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irbm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1959031823000490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在同一动物模型(小鼠)内,在三个不同的尺度(宏观尺度:整个肌肉,微观尺度:单层纤维和亚微观尺度:单个肌原纤维)上实验测量骨骼肌的选定被动特性,并比较每种量表的主要慢抽搐纤维肌(比目鱼肌)和主要快抽搐纤维肌肉(趾长伸肌,EDL)。方法采用健康3月龄野生型C57BL6小鼠。为了表征每个量表,采集比目鱼肌(N=11)、EDL(N=9)、慢纤维(N=17)、快纤维(N=16)以及比目鱼肌(N=11)和EDL(N=11。在每个尺度上进行被动机械(斜坡、松弛)测试,以比较给定尺度内、不同尺度和不同肌肉类型之间的被动特性(杨氏模量、静态和动态应力)。结果比目鱼肌和EDL在宏观尺度上表现出显著的被动力学差异,而在微观和亚微米尺度上两种组织之间没有观察到变化。结果强调了用于机械表征多尺度组织的尺度的重要性。结论本研究将有助于更好地理解两块生理和代谢特性截然不同的肌肉的多尺度被动力学特性。这项研究为未来的工作提供了参考数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiscale Passive Mechanical Characterization of Rodent Skeletal Muscle

Multiscale Passive Mechanical Characterization of Rodent Skeletal Muscle

Purpose

To experimentally measure selected passive properties of skeletal muscle at three different scales (macroscopic scale: whole muscle, microscopic scale: single skinned fiber, and submicron scale: single myofibril) within the same animal model (mice), and to compare a primarily slow-twitch fiber muscle (soleus) and a primarily fast-twitch fiber muscle (extensor digitorum longus, EDL) for each scale.

Methods

Healthy 3 months old wild-type C57BL6 mice were used. To characterize each scale, soleus (N = 11), EDL (N = 9), slow fibers (N = 17), fast fibers (N = 16), and myofibrils from soleus (N = 11) and EDL (N = 11) were harvested. Passive mechanical (ramp, relaxation) tests were applied at each scale to compare the passive properties (Young's modulus, static and dynamic stresses) within a given scale, across scales and between muscle types.

Results

The soleus and EDL showed significant passive mechanical differences at the macroscopic scale while no variation was observed between both tissues at the microscopic and submicron scales. The results highlight the importance of the scale that is used to mechanically characterize a multiscale tissue.

Conclusion

The present work will allow for a better understanding of the multiscale passive mechanical properties for two muscles with vastly differing physiological and metabolic properties. This study provides referent data to the body of literature that can be built upon in future work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irbm
Irbm ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: IRBM is the journal of the AGBM (Alliance for engineering in Biology an Medicine / Alliance pour le génie biologique et médical) and the SFGBM (BioMedical Engineering French Society / Société française de génie biologique médical) and the AFIB (French Association of Biomedical Engineers / Association française des ingénieurs biomédicaux). As a vehicle of information and knowledge in the field of biomedical technologies, IRBM is devoted to fundamental as well as clinical research. Biomedical engineering and use of new technologies are the cornerstones of IRBM, providing authors and users with the latest information. Its six issues per year propose reviews (state-of-the-art and current knowledge), original articles directed at fundamental research and articles focusing on biomedical engineering. All articles are submitted to peer reviewers acting as guarantors for IRBM''s scientific and medical content. The field covered by IRBM includes all the discipline of Biomedical engineering. Thereby, the type of papers published include those that cover the technological and methodological development in: -Physiological and Biological Signal processing (EEG, MEG, ECG…)- Medical Image processing- Biomechanics- Biomaterials- Medical Physics- Biophysics- Physiological and Biological Sensors- Information technologies in healthcare- Disability research- Computational physiology- …
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信