超镜夹相关不良事件报告分析:MAUDE数据库分析

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Daniyal Abbas , Mohamed Abdallah , Khalid Ahmed , Abubaker O. Abdalla , Nicholas McDonald , Shifa Umar , Brian J. Hanson , Mohammad Bilal
{"title":"超镜夹相关不良事件报告分析:MAUDE数据库分析","authors":"Daniyal Abbas ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdallah ,&nbsp;Khalid Ahmed ,&nbsp;Abubaker O. Abdalla ,&nbsp;Nicholas McDonald ,&nbsp;Shifa Umar ,&nbsp;Brian J. Hanson ,&nbsp;Mohammad Bilal","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2022.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae<span><span>, and anastomotic leaks in the </span>gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Over-the-Scope Clips: A MAUDE Database Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniyal Abbas ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdallah ,&nbsp;Khalid Ahmed ,&nbsp;Abubaker O. Abdalla ,&nbsp;Nicholas McDonald ,&nbsp;Shifa Umar ,&nbsp;Brian J. Hanson ,&nbsp;Mohammad Bilal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2022.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae<span><span>, and anastomotic leaks in the </span>gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000873\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的内镜下夹(OTSCs)已越来越多地用于治疗胃肠道出血、穿孔、瘘管和吻合口瘘。然而,自2010年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准以来,一直缺乏关于OTSC系统不良事件的数据。我们研究的目的是使用美国食品药品监督管理局的制造商和用户设备体验(MAUDE)数据库报告和分析与OTSC系统相关的不良事件和设备故障。方法我们分析了2013年1月至2022年5月美国食品药品监督管理局MAUDE数据库关于美国两个OTSC系统的上市后监测数据。不良事件分为器械相关问题和患者相关不良事件。报告了40个器械相关问题,以及20个器械相关不良事件。大多数与设备相关的问题报告在Padlock缺陷闭合系统(n=23)中,其次是Padlock pro clip系统(n=8)和Ovesco OTSC系统(n=9)。最常见的设备相关问题与OTSC部署失败有关(n=13),其次是材料突出或挤压(n=7)。最常见的患者不良事件是穿孔(n=4)、食道撕裂伤(n=4,出血(n=3)和管腔狭窄(n=3,)。所有4名患者都需要对穿孔进行手术治疗。没有与OTSC使用相关的死亡报告。结论OTSC部署失败和穿孔分别是最常见的器械相关问题和患者相关不良事件。随着OTSC系统的使用不断增加,内镜医生必须注意与OTSC使用相关的常见和罕见不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Over-the-Scope Clips: A MAUDE Database Analysis

Background and Aims

Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae, and anastomotic leaks in the gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Methods

We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.

Results

Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.

Conclusion

Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信