标准化方法提高食管内镜下黏膜下解剖手术速度的前瞻性评价

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Firas Bahdi , Michael M. Mercado , Xiaofan Huang , Kristen A. Staggers , Noor Zabad , Mohamed O. Othman
{"title":"标准化方法提高食管内镜下黏膜下解剖手术速度的前瞻性评价","authors":"Firas Bahdi ,&nbsp;Michael M. Mercado ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Huang ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Staggers ,&nbsp;Noor Zabad ,&nbsp;Mohamed O. Othman","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of esophageal lesions is limited by the lengthy procedure time, technique's complexity, and need for specialized training. We propose a standardized esophageal ESD technique that takes advantage of specimen self-retraction to improve visualization and procedure speed by starting the margins’ </span>incision at the anal side, followed by the laterals and the proximal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective clinical trial<span> of all consecutive patients who underwent a standardized esophageal ESD of esophageal lesions at a single tertiary referral center between December 2016 and January 2021. The primary outcome was the entire procedure speed calculated as centimeters squared per hour. Secondary outcomes included the rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, and adverse events. Linear regression analysis was conducted to test the association between the entire procedure speed and tumor location, number of knives used, year of procedure, and pathology results.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-two patients prospectively enrolled in our study. The mean patient age was 65 ± 10.9 years. The mean specimen surface area was 17.9 ± 12.7 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean entire procedure speed was 11 ± 5.9 cm<sup>2</sup>/h. The mean total procedure time was 93.5 ± 31 minutes. The entire procedure speed was significantly faster with procedures performed over the last 3 years (+5.86 cm<sup>2</sup>/h; <em>P</em><span> = 0.003) or Barrett's esophagus (+7.77 cm</span><sup>2</sup>/h; <em>P</em> = 0.001). En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 68.8%, respectively. There were only 2 early bleeding events (6.3%) and 4 stricture formations (12.5%). All adverse events were successfully managed endoscopically.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our standardized esophageal ESD technique offered our operator a remarkable entire procedure speed with continuous annual improvement and an acceptable safety profile. Future controlled multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the results’ generalizability and help promote wider adoption of esophageal ESD (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04547881).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Approach to Improve Procedure Speed in Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection\",\"authors\":\"Firas Bahdi ,&nbsp;Michael M. Mercado ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Huang ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Staggers ,&nbsp;Noor Zabad ,&nbsp;Mohamed O. Othman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2023.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of esophageal lesions is limited by the lengthy procedure time, technique's complexity, and need for specialized training. We propose a standardized esophageal ESD technique that takes advantage of specimen self-retraction to improve visualization and procedure speed by starting the margins’ </span>incision at the anal side, followed by the laterals and the proximal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective clinical trial<span> of all consecutive patients who underwent a standardized esophageal ESD of esophageal lesions at a single tertiary referral center between December 2016 and January 2021. The primary outcome was the entire procedure speed calculated as centimeters squared per hour. Secondary outcomes included the rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, and adverse events. Linear regression analysis was conducted to test the association between the entire procedure speed and tumor location, number of knives used, year of procedure, and pathology results.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-two patients prospectively enrolled in our study. The mean patient age was 65 ± 10.9 years. The mean specimen surface area was 17.9 ± 12.7 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean entire procedure speed was 11 ± 5.9 cm<sup>2</sup>/h. The mean total procedure time was 93.5 ± 31 minutes. The entire procedure speed was significantly faster with procedures performed over the last 3 years (+5.86 cm<sup>2</sup>/h; <em>P</em><span> = 0.003) or Barrett's esophagus (+7.77 cm</span><sup>2</sup>/h; <em>P</em> = 0.001). En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 68.8%, respectively. There were only 2 early bleeding events (6.3%) and 4 stricture formations (12.5%). All adverse events were successfully managed endoscopically.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our standardized esophageal ESD technique offered our operator a remarkable entire procedure speed with continuous annual improvement and an acceptable safety profile. Future controlled multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the results’ generalizability and help promote wider adoption of esophageal ESD (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04547881).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的食管病变的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)由于手术时间长、技术复杂以及需要专业培训而受到限制。我们提出了一种标准化的食管ESD技术,该技术利用标本自回缩的优势,通过在肛门侧开始边缘切口,然后在外侧和近端开始切口,来提高可视化和手术速度。方法这是一项前瞻性临床试验,对2016年12月至2021年1月期间在单一三级转诊中心接受标准化食管ESD治疗的所有连续患者进行了研究。主要结果是整个手术速度以厘米每小时的平方计算。次要结果包括整体切除率、R0切除率和不良事件。进行线性回归分析,以测试整个手术速度与肿瘤位置、使用刀具数量、手术年份和病理结果之间的相关性。结果32例患者前瞻性地纳入本研究。患者平均年龄为65±10.9岁。样品的平均表面积为17.9±12.7 cm2。整个过程的平均速度为11±5.9 cm2/h。平均总手术时间为93.5±31分钟。在过去3年中进行的手术(+5.86 cm2/h;P=0.003)或Barrett食管(+7.77 cm2/h,P=0.001)的整个手术速度明显更快。整体切除率和R0切除率分别为100%和68.8%。仅有2例早期出血事件(6.3%)和4例狭窄形成(12.5%)。所有不良事件均通过内镜成功控制。结论我们的标准化食管ESD技术为我们的操作者提供了显著的全过程速度,每年都在不断改进,并且具有可接受的安全性。未来的对照多中心研究有必要证实结果的可推广性,并有助于促进食管ESD的更广泛采用(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04547881)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Approach to Improve Procedure Speed in Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Background and Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of esophageal lesions is limited by the lengthy procedure time, technique's complexity, and need for specialized training. We propose a standardized esophageal ESD technique that takes advantage of specimen self-retraction to improve visualization and procedure speed by starting the margins’ incision at the anal side, followed by the laterals and the proximal.

Methods

This was a prospective clinical trial of all consecutive patients who underwent a standardized esophageal ESD of esophageal lesions at a single tertiary referral center between December 2016 and January 2021. The primary outcome was the entire procedure speed calculated as centimeters squared per hour. Secondary outcomes included the rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, and adverse events. Linear regression analysis was conducted to test the association between the entire procedure speed and tumor location, number of knives used, year of procedure, and pathology results.

Results

Thirty-two patients prospectively enrolled in our study. The mean patient age was 65 ± 10.9 years. The mean specimen surface area was 17.9 ± 12.7 cm2. The mean entire procedure speed was 11 ± 5.9 cm2/h. The mean total procedure time was 93.5 ± 31 minutes. The entire procedure speed was significantly faster with procedures performed over the last 3 years (+5.86 cm2/h; P = 0.003) or Barrett's esophagus (+7.77 cm2/h; P = 0.001). En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 68.8%, respectively. There were only 2 early bleeding events (6.3%) and 4 stricture formations (12.5%). All adverse events were successfully managed endoscopically.

Conclusion

Our standardized esophageal ESD technique offered our operator a remarkable entire procedure speed with continuous annual improvement and an acceptable safety profile. Future controlled multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the results’ generalizability and help promote wider adoption of esophageal ESD (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04547881).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信