水资源系统的模型预测控制:综述与研究议程

IF 7.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Andrea Castelletti , Andrea Ficchì , Andrea Cominola , Pablo Segovia , Matteo Giuliani , Wenyan Wu , Sergio Lucia , Carlos Ocampo-Martinez , Bart De Schutter , José María Maestre
{"title":"水资源系统的模型预测控制:综述与研究议程","authors":"Andrea Castelletti ,&nbsp;Andrea Ficchì ,&nbsp;Andrea Cominola ,&nbsp;Pablo Segovia ,&nbsp;Matteo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Wenyan Wu ,&nbsp;Sergio Lucia ,&nbsp;Carlos Ocampo-Martinez ,&nbsp;Bart De Schutter ,&nbsp;José María Maestre","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Model Predictive Control (MPC) has recently gained increasing interest in the adaptive management of water resources systems due to its capability of incorporating disturbance forecasts into real-time optimal control problems. Yet, related literature is scattered with heterogeneous applications, case-specific problem settings, and results that are hardly generalized and transferable across systems. Here, we systematically review 149 peer-reviewed journal articles published over the last 25 years on MPC applied to water reservoirs, open channels, and urban water networks to identify common trends and open challenges in research and practice. The three water systems we consider are inter-connected, multi-purpose and multi-scale dynamical systems affected by multiple hydro-climatic uncertainties and evolving socioeconomic factors. Our review first identifies four main challenges currently limiting most MPC applications in the water domain: (i) lack of systematic benchmarking of MPC with respect to other control methods; (ii) lack of assessment of the impact of uncertainties on the model-based control; (iii) limited analysis of the impact of diverse forecast types, resolutions, and prediction horizons; (iv) under-consideration of the multi-objective nature of most water resources systems. We then argue that future MPC applications in water resources systems should focus on addressing these four challenges as key priorities for future developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 442-465"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Predictive Control of water resources systems: A review and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Castelletti ,&nbsp;Andrea Ficchì ,&nbsp;Andrea Cominola ,&nbsp;Pablo Segovia ,&nbsp;Matteo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Wenyan Wu ,&nbsp;Sergio Lucia ,&nbsp;Carlos Ocampo-Martinez ,&nbsp;Bart De Schutter ,&nbsp;José María Maestre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Model Predictive Control (MPC) has recently gained increasing interest in the adaptive management of water resources systems due to its capability of incorporating disturbance forecasts into real-time optimal control problems. Yet, related literature is scattered with heterogeneous applications, case-specific problem settings, and results that are hardly generalized and transferable across systems. Here, we systematically review 149 peer-reviewed journal articles published over the last 25 years on MPC applied to water reservoirs, open channels, and urban water networks to identify common trends and open challenges in research and practice. The three water systems we consider are inter-connected, multi-purpose and multi-scale dynamical systems affected by multiple hydro-climatic uncertainties and evolving socioeconomic factors. Our review first identifies four main challenges currently limiting most MPC applications in the water domain: (i) lack of systematic benchmarking of MPC with respect to other control methods; (ii) lack of assessment of the impact of uncertainties on the model-based control; (iii) limited analysis of the impact of diverse forecast types, resolutions, and prediction horizons; (iv) under-consideration of the multi-objective nature of most water resources systems. We then argue that future MPC applications in water resources systems should focus on addressing these four challenges as key priorities for future developments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 442-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

模型预测控制(MPC)由于其将扰动预测纳入实时最优控制问题的能力,最近在水资源系统的自适应管理中引起了越来越多的兴趣。然而,相关文献分散在异构应用程序、特定案例的问题设置以及难以在系统间推广和转移的结果中。在这里,我们系统地回顾了过去25年中发表的149篇关于MPC应用于水库、明渠和城市供水网络的同行评审期刊文章,以确定研究和实践中的共同趋势和公开挑战。我们考虑的三个水系是相互连接的、多用途的、多尺度的动力系统,受多种水文气候不确定性和不断演变的社会经济因素的影响。我们的综述首先确定了目前限制MPC在水领域应用的四个主要挑战:(i)缺乏MPC相对于其他控制方法的系统基准;(ii)缺乏对不确定性对基于模型的控制的影响的评估;(iii)对不同预测类型、分辨率和预测范围的影响进行有限分析;(iv)考虑到大多数水资源系统的多目标性质。然后,我们认为,MPC在水资源系统中的未来应用应侧重于解决这四个挑战,将其作为未来发展的关键优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Predictive Control of water resources systems: A review and research agenda

Model Predictive Control (MPC) has recently gained increasing interest in the adaptive management of water resources systems due to its capability of incorporating disturbance forecasts into real-time optimal control problems. Yet, related literature is scattered with heterogeneous applications, case-specific problem settings, and results that are hardly generalized and transferable across systems. Here, we systematically review 149 peer-reviewed journal articles published over the last 25 years on MPC applied to water reservoirs, open channels, and urban water networks to identify common trends and open challenges in research and practice. The three water systems we consider are inter-connected, multi-purpose and multi-scale dynamical systems affected by multiple hydro-climatic uncertainties and evolving socioeconomic factors. Our review first identifies four main challenges currently limiting most MPC applications in the water domain: (i) lack of systematic benchmarking of MPC with respect to other control methods; (ii) lack of assessment of the impact of uncertainties on the model-based control; (iii) limited analysis of the impact of diverse forecast types, resolutions, and prediction horizons; (iv) under-consideration of the multi-objective nature of most water resources systems. We then argue that future MPC applications in water resources systems should focus on addressing these four challenges as key priorities for future developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Reviews in Control
Annual Reviews in Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles: Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected. Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信