自动道路车辆模型预测路径跟踪控制综述

IF 7.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
P. Stano , U. Montanaro , D. Tavernini , M. Tufo , G. Fiengo , L. Novella , A. Sorniotti
{"title":"自动道路车辆模型预测路径跟踪控制综述","authors":"P. Stano ,&nbsp;U. Montanaro ,&nbsp;D. Tavernini ,&nbsp;M. Tufo ,&nbsp;G. Fiengo ,&nbsp;L. Novella ,&nbsp;A. Sorniotti","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thanks to their road safety potential, automated vehicles are rapidly becoming a reality. In the last decade, automated driving has been the focus of intensive automotive engineering research, with the support of industry and governmental organisations. In automated driving systems, the path tracking layer defines the actuator commands to follow the reference path and speed profile. Model predictive control (MPC) is widely used for trajectory tracking because of its capability of managing multi-variable problems, and systematically considering constraints on states and control actions, as well as accounting for the expected future behaviour of the system. Despite the very large number of publications of the last few years, the literature lacks a comprehensive and updated survey on MPC for path tracking. To cover the gap, this literature review deals with the research conducted from 2015 until 2021 on model predictive path tracking control. Firstly, the survey highlights the significance of MPC in the recent path tracking control literature, with respect to alternative control structures. After classifying the different typologies of MPC for path tracking control, the adopted prediction models are critically analysed, together with typical optimal control problem formulations. This is followed by a summary of the most relevant results, which provides practical design indications, e.g., in terms of selection of prediction and control horizons. Finally, the most recent development trends are analysed, together with likely areas of further investigations, and the main conclusions are drawn.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 194-236"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model predictive path tracking control for automated road vehicles: A review\",\"authors\":\"P. Stano ,&nbsp;U. Montanaro ,&nbsp;D. Tavernini ,&nbsp;M. Tufo ,&nbsp;G. Fiengo ,&nbsp;L. Novella ,&nbsp;A. Sorniotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Thanks to their road safety potential, automated vehicles are rapidly becoming a reality. In the last decade, automated driving has been the focus of intensive automotive engineering research, with the support of industry and governmental organisations. In automated driving systems, the path tracking layer defines the actuator commands to follow the reference path and speed profile. Model predictive control (MPC) is widely used for trajectory tracking because of its capability of managing multi-variable problems, and systematically considering constraints on states and control actions, as well as accounting for the expected future behaviour of the system. Despite the very large number of publications of the last few years, the literature lacks a comprehensive and updated survey on MPC for path tracking. To cover the gap, this literature review deals with the research conducted from 2015 until 2021 on model predictive path tracking control. Firstly, the survey highlights the significance of MPC in the recent path tracking control literature, with respect to alternative control structures. After classifying the different typologies of MPC for path tracking control, the adopted prediction models are critically analysed, together with typical optimal control problem formulations. This is followed by a summary of the most relevant results, which provides practical design indications, e.g., in terms of selection of prediction and control horizons. Finally, the most recent development trends are analysed, together with likely areas of further investigations, and the main conclusions are drawn.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578822001377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578822001377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

由于其道路安全潜力,自动驾驶汽车正在迅速成为现实。在过去的十年里,在行业和政府组织的支持下,自动驾驶一直是密集的汽车工程研究的重点。在自动驾驶系统中,路径跟踪层定义执行器命令以遵循参考路径和速度轮廓。模型预测控制(MPC)被广泛用于轨迹跟踪,因为它能够管理多变量问题,系统地考虑状态和控制动作的约束,并考虑系统的预期未来行为。尽管在过去几年中发表了大量的出版物,但文献中缺乏关于MPC路径跟踪的全面和更新的调查。为了弥补这一差距,本文献综述涉及2015年至2021年进行的关于模型预测路径跟踪控制的研究。首先,调查强调了MPC在最近的路径跟踪控制文献中关于替代控制结构的重要性。在对路径跟踪控制的MPC的不同类型进行分类后,对所采用的预测模型以及典型的最优控制问题公式进行了批判性分析。随后是最相关结果的总结,提供了实用的设计指示,例如,在预测和控制层的选择方面。最后,分析了最新的发展趋势,以及可能需要进一步调查的领域,并得出了主要结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model predictive path tracking control for automated road vehicles: A review

Thanks to their road safety potential, automated vehicles are rapidly becoming a reality. In the last decade, automated driving has been the focus of intensive automotive engineering research, with the support of industry and governmental organisations. In automated driving systems, the path tracking layer defines the actuator commands to follow the reference path and speed profile. Model predictive control (MPC) is widely used for trajectory tracking because of its capability of managing multi-variable problems, and systematically considering constraints on states and control actions, as well as accounting for the expected future behaviour of the system. Despite the very large number of publications of the last few years, the literature lacks a comprehensive and updated survey on MPC for path tracking. To cover the gap, this literature review deals with the research conducted from 2015 until 2021 on model predictive path tracking control. Firstly, the survey highlights the significance of MPC in the recent path tracking control literature, with respect to alternative control structures. After classifying the different typologies of MPC for path tracking control, the adopted prediction models are critically analysed, together with typical optimal control problem formulations. This is followed by a summary of the most relevant results, which provides practical design indications, e.g., in terms of selection of prediction and control horizons. Finally, the most recent development trends are analysed, together with likely areas of further investigations, and the main conclusions are drawn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Reviews in Control
Annual Reviews in Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles: Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected. Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信