举实验室大鼠:方法的调查,处理者的原因和关注,和大鼠的行为反应

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Charlotte C. Burn, Trinity Camacho, Jo Hockenhull
{"title":"举实验室大鼠:方法的调查,处理者的原因和关注,和大鼠的行为反应","authors":"Charlotte C. Burn,&nbsp;Trinity Camacho,&nbsp;Jo Hockenhull","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lifting mice by the tail is of animal welfare and scientific concern, but rat lifting methods are little researched, potentially differing from mice. Using an online questionnaire we explored different methods for lifting laboratory rats, alongside handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses. We received 249 valid responses from self-selected rat handlers across research sectors, job roles, and 26 countries (39% UK). In this sample, eight different lifting methods, plus ‘other’, were used; Shoulder saddle (39%), Chest-and-bottom support (20%) and Tail lifting (11%) were most common. Regarding respondents’ reasons for using their main lifting method, those using Tail lifting selected ‘rat comfort’ significantly less frequently, and ‘quick’ more frequently, than did those using other methods. Most respondents had no concerns about their main lifting method, but those using Tail lifting were significantly more concerned about possible ‘stress to the rat’ than were those using Chest-and-bottom support. Concerns about speed, feasibility and scientific validity were rare. Rats reportedly defecated significantly more, and sniffed the hand less, when Tail lifted than when lifted using Chest-and-bottom support. Respondents who used Cupped hands reported rats to approach, sniff and climb onto their hand significantly more than respondents using certain other methods did. Notwithstanding potential sample bias, the findings suggest that lifting rats by the tail risks unnecessary suffering. It is also potentially concerning that the most common method, Shoulder saddle, showed no significant benefits over Tail lifting. Chest-and-bottom support, Cupping, Tunnel, and some rarer methods, may offer more refined methods for lifting rats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 106077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifting laboratory rats: A survey of methods, handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte C. Burn,&nbsp;Trinity Camacho,&nbsp;Jo Hockenhull\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lifting mice by the tail is of animal welfare and scientific concern, but rat lifting methods are little researched, potentially differing from mice. Using an online questionnaire we explored different methods for lifting laboratory rats, alongside handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses. We received 249 valid responses from self-selected rat handlers across research sectors, job roles, and 26 countries (39% UK). In this sample, eight different lifting methods, plus ‘other’, were used; Shoulder saddle (39%), Chest-and-bottom support (20%) and Tail lifting (11%) were most common. Regarding respondents’ reasons for using their main lifting method, those using Tail lifting selected ‘rat comfort’ significantly less frequently, and ‘quick’ more frequently, than did those using other methods. Most respondents had no concerns about their main lifting method, but those using Tail lifting were significantly more concerned about possible ‘stress to the rat’ than were those using Chest-and-bottom support. Concerns about speed, feasibility and scientific validity were rare. Rats reportedly defecated significantly more, and sniffed the hand less, when Tail lifted than when lifted using Chest-and-bottom support. Respondents who used Cupped hands reported rats to approach, sniff and climb onto their hand significantly more than respondents using certain other methods did. Notwithstanding potential sample bias, the findings suggest that lifting rats by the tail risks unnecessary suffering. It is also potentially concerning that the most common method, Shoulder saddle, showed no significant benefits over Tail lifting. Chest-and-bottom support, Cupping, Tunnel, and some rarer methods, may offer more refined methods for lifting rats.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"268 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159123002496\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159123002496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用尾巴抬老鼠是动物福利和科学关注的问题,但抬老鼠的方法很少被研究,可能与老鼠不同。通过在线问卷调查,我们探讨了饲养实验室大鼠的不同方法,以及饲养员的原因和担忧,以及大鼠的行为反应。我们收到了249份来自研究部门、工作岗位和26个国家(39%的英国)的自选老鼠管理员的有效回复。在这个样本中,使用了八种不同的提升方法,加上“其他”;最常见的是肩鞍(39%)、胸部和底部支撑(20%)以及提尾(11%)。关于受访者使用主要提升方法的原因,与使用其他方法的受访者相比,使用“尾巴提升”的受访者选择“老鼠舒适度”的频率明显较低,选择“快速”的频率更高。大多数受访者并不担心他们的主要提举方法,但那些使用提尾的人比那些使用胸部和底部支撑的人更担心可能的“对大鼠的压力”。很少有人关心速度、可行性和科学有效性。据报道,当尾巴抬起时,老鼠的排便次数明显多于使用胸部和底部支撑抬起时,闻手的次数更少。使用杯状手的受访者报告说,与使用某些其他方法的受访者相比,老鼠更容易接近、嗅闻和爬到他们的手上。尽管存在潜在的样本偏差,但研究结果表明,抓住老鼠的尾巴可能会带来不必要的痛苦。同样令人担忧的是,最常见的方法,肩鞍,与提尾相比没有显示出显著的好处。胸部和底部支撑、拔罐、隧道和一些罕见的方法,可能会为提升大鼠提供更精细的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lifting laboratory rats: A survey of methods, handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses

Lifting laboratory rats: A survey of methods, handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses

Lifting mice by the tail is of animal welfare and scientific concern, but rat lifting methods are little researched, potentially differing from mice. Using an online questionnaire we explored different methods for lifting laboratory rats, alongside handlers’ reasons and concerns, and rat behavioural responses. We received 249 valid responses from self-selected rat handlers across research sectors, job roles, and 26 countries (39% UK). In this sample, eight different lifting methods, plus ‘other’, were used; Shoulder saddle (39%), Chest-and-bottom support (20%) and Tail lifting (11%) were most common. Regarding respondents’ reasons for using their main lifting method, those using Tail lifting selected ‘rat comfort’ significantly less frequently, and ‘quick’ more frequently, than did those using other methods. Most respondents had no concerns about their main lifting method, but those using Tail lifting were significantly more concerned about possible ‘stress to the rat’ than were those using Chest-and-bottom support. Concerns about speed, feasibility and scientific validity were rare. Rats reportedly defecated significantly more, and sniffed the hand less, when Tail lifted than when lifted using Chest-and-bottom support. Respondents who used Cupped hands reported rats to approach, sniff and climb onto their hand significantly more than respondents using certain other methods did. Notwithstanding potential sample bias, the findings suggest that lifting rats by the tail risks unnecessary suffering. It is also potentially concerning that the most common method, Shoulder saddle, showed no significant benefits over Tail lifting. Chest-and-bottom support, Cupping, Tunnel, and some rarer methods, may offer more refined methods for lifting rats.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信