头颈部肿瘤手术中的经皮气管造口术:Covid-19如何改变我们的做法

Ahmed Abdelrahman, Natalie Turton, Matthew R. Idle, Prav Praveen, Tim Martin, Sat Parmar
{"title":"头颈部肿瘤手术中的经皮气管造口术:Covid-19如何改变我们的做法","authors":"Ahmed Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Natalie Turton,&nbsp;Matthew R. Idle,&nbsp;Prav Praveen,&nbsp;Tim Martin,&nbsp;Sat Parmar","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enhanced experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes to airway management protocol for patients undergoing major head and neck reconstructive surgery within our department. Most patients now receive a percutaneous tracheostomy over the previously favoured surgical tracheostomy. The aim of this study was to review our experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies, whilst comparing complication rates with surgical tracheostomies performed in similar settings. All consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer between June 2020 and November 2021 were included, with 56 patients receiving a percutaneous tracheostomy. Data across a range of variables including age, BMI, comorbidities and complications was compared with 56 surgical tracheostomies performed for the same group of patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant protocol changes. In the percutaneous group, a marginally lower complication rate was observed over the surgical tracheostomy group; 28.57% and 30.35% respectively. Analysis of the 16 patients who experienced complications in the percutaneous group led to development of selection criteria to identify appropriate patients to receive a percutaneous tracheostomy in future, based on factors such as BMI, bleeding risk and positioning deformities. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered a multitude of learning experiences for healthcare professionals to change our practice. In our unit, this has involved modifying the routine tracheostomy procedure used for airway management intra- and post-operatively in major head and neck reconstruction surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous tracheostomy in head and neck oncology surgery: How Covid-19 changed our practice\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Natalie Turton,&nbsp;Matthew R. Idle,&nbsp;Prav Praveen,&nbsp;Tim Martin,&nbsp;Sat Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Enhanced experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes to airway management protocol for patients undergoing major head and neck reconstructive surgery within our department. Most patients now receive a percutaneous tracheostomy over the previously favoured surgical tracheostomy. The aim of this study was to review our experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies, whilst comparing complication rates with surgical tracheostomies performed in similar settings. All consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer between June 2020 and November 2021 were included, with 56 patients receiving a percutaneous tracheostomy. Data across a range of variables including age, BMI, comorbidities and complications was compared with 56 surgical tracheostomies performed for the same group of patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant protocol changes. In the percutaneous group, a marginally lower complication rate was observed over the surgical tracheostomy group; 28.57% and 30.35% respectively. Analysis of the 16 patients who experienced complications in the percutaneous group led to development of selection criteria to identify appropriate patients to receive a percutaneous tracheostomy in future, based on factors such as BMI, bleeding risk and positioning deformities. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered a multitude of learning experiences for healthcare professionals to change our practice. In our unit, this has involved modifying the routine tracheostomy procedure used for airway management intra- and post-operatively in major head and neck reconstruction surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新冠肺炎大流行期间,经皮气管切开术的经验有所增加,导致我科接受重大头颈部重建手术的患者的气道管理方案发生了变化。大多数患者现在接受经皮气管造口术,而不是以前喜欢的外科气管造口术。本研究的目的是回顾我们进行经皮气管造口术的经验,同时将并发症发生率与在类似环境下进行的外科气管造口术进行比较。纳入2020年6月至2021年11月期间接受癌症头颈部自由皮瓣重建手术的所有连续患者,其中56名患者接受了经皮气管切开术。将包括年龄、BMI、合并症和并发症在内的一系列变量的数据与新冠肺炎大流行前为同一组患者进行的56次气管切开手术以及由此导致的方案变化进行了比较。在经皮组中,观察到并发症发生率略低于外科气管造口术组;分别为28.57%和30.35%。对经皮组中16名出现并发症的患者进行分析后,根据BMI、出血风险和定位畸形等因素,制定了选择标准,以确定未来接受经皮气管造口术的合适患者。新冠肺炎大流行为医疗保健专业人员提供了丰富的学习经验,以改变我们的做法。在我们单位,这涉及到在主要的头颈部重建手术中,修改用于术中和术后气道管理的常规气管造口术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous tracheostomy in head and neck oncology surgery: How Covid-19 changed our practice

Enhanced experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes to airway management protocol for patients undergoing major head and neck reconstructive surgery within our department. Most patients now receive a percutaneous tracheostomy over the previously favoured surgical tracheostomy. The aim of this study was to review our experience in performing percutaneous tracheostomies, whilst comparing complication rates with surgical tracheostomies performed in similar settings. All consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer between June 2020 and November 2021 were included, with 56 patients receiving a percutaneous tracheostomy. Data across a range of variables including age, BMI, comorbidities and complications was compared with 56 surgical tracheostomies performed for the same group of patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant protocol changes. In the percutaneous group, a marginally lower complication rate was observed over the surgical tracheostomy group; 28.57% and 30.35% respectively. Analysis of the 16 patients who experienced complications in the percutaneous group led to development of selection criteria to identify appropriate patients to receive a percutaneous tracheostomy in future, based on factors such as BMI, bleeding risk and positioning deformities. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered a multitude of learning experiences for healthcare professionals to change our practice. In our unit, this has involved modifying the routine tracheostomy procedure used for airway management intra- and post-operatively in major head and neck reconstruction surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信