在减肥手术期间进行胆囊切除术是否合理?回顾性研究

Maria Hakim , Marianne Alwan , Mandy Nakhle , Georges Khazen , Georges Al-Hajj , Rodrigue Chemaly
{"title":"在减肥手术期间进行胆囊切除术是否合理?回顾性研究","authors":"Maria Hakim ,&nbsp;Marianne Alwan ,&nbsp;Mandy Nakhle ,&nbsp;Georges Khazen ,&nbsp;Georges Al-Hajj ,&nbsp;Rodrigue Chemaly","doi":"10.1016/j.soda.2023.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nowadays, sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) has become a cornerstone in treating morbid obesity, a condition that has turned into one of the most important health concerns worldwide. Nonetheless, gallbladder (GB) disease remains a frequently seen problem after weight loss. The performance of concomitant cholecystectomy with SG (SCC) is yet still controversial. The study's aim is to assess the safety of performing SCC, the operative time, length of hospital stay (LOS) and the postoperative complications. This is a retrospective case-control study, conducted in Lebanon, comparing patients treated with SG, as control group A, to patients who underwent SCC (group B). Out of 120 patients included in the study, 100 underwent SG and 20 underwent SCC. Those who underwent SCC had an abnormal abdominal ultrasound (US) preoperatively. Out of the patients who had a SG, 40 patients (13.7%) underwent a subsequent cholecystectomy due to GB disease. Eight out of 40 patients (20%) suffered from complications, mainly related to common bile duct stone migration, requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The mean time until presentation for cholelithiasis post bariatric surgery was 13.03 (±10.01) months and the mean weight loss achieved was 29.9 (±8.8) Kilograms. The mean operative time was increased by 29.9 min (min) for SCC (146.7 min) compared to SG alone (116.8 min). Our study results showed that the incidence of symptomatic GB disease post bariatric surgery (BS) was relatively high and cholecystectomy at that time was not straightforward. Also, SCC performance was highly dependent on the result of the preoperative US.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101190,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is concomitant cholecystectomy at the time of bariatric surgery justified? a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Maria Hakim ,&nbsp;Marianne Alwan ,&nbsp;Mandy Nakhle ,&nbsp;Georges Khazen ,&nbsp;Georges Al-Hajj ,&nbsp;Rodrigue Chemaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soda.2023.100082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nowadays, sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) has become a cornerstone in treating morbid obesity, a condition that has turned into one of the most important health concerns worldwide. Nonetheless, gallbladder (GB) disease remains a frequently seen problem after weight loss. The performance of concomitant cholecystectomy with SG (SCC) is yet still controversial. The study's aim is to assess the safety of performing SCC, the operative time, length of hospital stay (LOS) and the postoperative complications. This is a retrospective case-control study, conducted in Lebanon, comparing patients treated with SG, as control group A, to patients who underwent SCC (group B). Out of 120 patients included in the study, 100 underwent SG and 20 underwent SCC. Those who underwent SCC had an abnormal abdominal ultrasound (US) preoperatively. Out of the patients who had a SG, 40 patients (13.7%) underwent a subsequent cholecystectomy due to GB disease. Eight out of 40 patients (20%) suffered from complications, mainly related to common bile duct stone migration, requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The mean time until presentation for cholelithiasis post bariatric surgery was 13.03 (±10.01) months and the mean weight loss achieved was 29.9 (±8.8) Kilograms. The mean operative time was increased by 29.9 min (min) for SCC (146.7 min) compared to SG alone (116.8 min). Our study results showed that the incidence of symptomatic GB disease post bariatric surgery (BS) was relatively high and cholecystectomy at that time was not straightforward. Also, SCC performance was highly dependent on the result of the preoperative US.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Open Digestive Advance\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Open Digestive Advance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008923000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008923000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,袖状胃切除术(SG)已成为治疗病态肥胖的基石,这种疾病已成为全世界最重要的健康问题之一。尽管如此,胆囊疾病仍然是减肥后常见的问题。SG合并胆囊切除术(SCC)的表现仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估进行SCC的安全性、手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症。这是一项在黎巴嫩进行的回顾性病例对照研究,将接受SG治疗的患者作为对照组a与接受SCC治疗的患者(B组)进行比较。在纳入研究的120名患者中,100人接受了SG治疗,20人接受了SCC治疗。那些接受SCC的患者术前腹部超声(US)异常。在患有SG的患者中,40名患者(13.7%)因GB疾病接受了随后的胆囊切除术。40名患者中有8名(20%)出现并发症,主要与胆总管结石移位有关,需要内镜下逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。减肥手术后出现胆结石的平均时间为13.03(±10.01)个月,平均减重29.9(±8.8)公斤。与单独使用SG(116.8分钟)相比,SCC的平均手术时间(146.7分钟)增加了29.9分钟。我们的研究结果表明,减肥手术(BS)后症状性GB疾病的发生率相对较高,而当时的胆囊切除术并不简单。此外,SCC的表现高度依赖于术前US的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is concomitant cholecystectomy at the time of bariatric surgery justified? a retrospective study

Nowadays, sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) has become a cornerstone in treating morbid obesity, a condition that has turned into one of the most important health concerns worldwide. Nonetheless, gallbladder (GB) disease remains a frequently seen problem after weight loss. The performance of concomitant cholecystectomy with SG (SCC) is yet still controversial. The study's aim is to assess the safety of performing SCC, the operative time, length of hospital stay (LOS) and the postoperative complications. This is a retrospective case-control study, conducted in Lebanon, comparing patients treated with SG, as control group A, to patients who underwent SCC (group B). Out of 120 patients included in the study, 100 underwent SG and 20 underwent SCC. Those who underwent SCC had an abnormal abdominal ultrasound (US) preoperatively. Out of the patients who had a SG, 40 patients (13.7%) underwent a subsequent cholecystectomy due to GB disease. Eight out of 40 patients (20%) suffered from complications, mainly related to common bile duct stone migration, requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The mean time until presentation for cholelithiasis post bariatric surgery was 13.03 (±10.01) months and the mean weight loss achieved was 29.9 (±8.8) Kilograms. The mean operative time was increased by 29.9 min (min) for SCC (146.7 min) compared to SG alone (116.8 min). Our study results showed that the incidence of symptomatic GB disease post bariatric surgery (BS) was relatively high and cholecystectomy at that time was not straightforward. Also, SCC performance was highly dependent on the result of the preoperative US.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信