磷酸锆(IV)对90Sr的吸附性能比较研究

Wanjun Mu, Baihua Chen, Xingliang Li
{"title":"磷酸锆(IV)对90Sr的吸附性能比较研究","authors":"Wanjun Mu,&nbsp;Baihua Chen,&nbsp;Xingliang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.nucana.2023.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With as goal of improving on traditional α-ZrP, four zirconium phosphonate materials were prepared as potential adsorbents for the removal of <sup>90</sup>Sr from nuclear wastewater. A typical sol–gel method was used, for phosphonates: hydroxy ethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP), amino tri-(methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP), ethylene diamine tetra-(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP), and diethylenetriamine penta-(methylenephosphonic acid) (DETPMP) to give ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively. These materials exhibit a similar crystalline phase to α-ZrP, but have a completely different morphology. After loading of these organophosphonate groups, the original sheet-morphology disappears, and the materials were consistent with smaller particles. However, the loading of organophosphonate groups expands the inter-layer distances. Remarkably, these materials have a stronger ability to remove Sr<sup>2+</sup>, with higher adsorption capacity than α-ZrP, especially ZrP-ATMP due to its wider layer distance. The maximum adsorption capacities for Sr<sup>2+</sup> are 158 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, 175 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, 115 mg g<sup>−1</sup> and 76 mg g<sup>−1</sup>for ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively, while that ofα-ZrP is 55 mg g<sup>−1</sup>. The higher adsorption capacities of these zirconium phosphonate materials is attributed to their wider interlayer spacing, allowing more room for Sr<sup>2+</sup> to move.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100965,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of adsorption properties of zirconium (IV) phosphonates for removal of 90Sr\",\"authors\":\"Wanjun Mu,&nbsp;Baihua Chen,&nbsp;Xingliang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucana.2023.100072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With as goal of improving on traditional α-ZrP, four zirconium phosphonate materials were prepared as potential adsorbents for the removal of <sup>90</sup>Sr from nuclear wastewater. A typical sol–gel method was used, for phosphonates: hydroxy ethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP), amino tri-(methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP), ethylene diamine tetra-(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP), and diethylenetriamine penta-(methylenephosphonic acid) (DETPMP) to give ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively. These materials exhibit a similar crystalline phase to α-ZrP, but have a completely different morphology. After loading of these organophosphonate groups, the original sheet-morphology disappears, and the materials were consistent with smaller particles. However, the loading of organophosphonate groups expands the inter-layer distances. Remarkably, these materials have a stronger ability to remove Sr<sup>2+</sup>, with higher adsorption capacity than α-ZrP, especially ZrP-ATMP due to its wider layer distance. The maximum adsorption capacities for Sr<sup>2+</sup> are 158 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, 175 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, 115 mg g<sup>−1</sup> and 76 mg g<sup>−1</sup>for ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively, while that ofα-ZrP is 55 mg g<sup>−1</sup>. The higher adsorption capacities of these zirconium phosphonate materials is attributed to their wider interlayer spacing, allowing more room for Sr<sup>2+</sup> to move.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773183923000265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773183923000265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以改进传统的α-ZrP为目标,制备了四种膦酸锆材料作为去除核废水中90Sr的潜在吸附剂。使用典型的溶胶-凝胶法,对膦酸盐:羟基亚乙基二膦酸(HEDP)、氨基三-(亚甲基膦酸)(ATMP)、乙二胺四-(亚甲基磷酸)(EDTMP)和二亚乙基三胺五-(亚甲基磷酸)(DETPMP),分别得到ZrP-HEDP、ZrP-ATMP、ZrP-EDTMP和ZrP-DETPMP。这些材料表现出与α-ZrP相似的结晶相,但具有完全不同的形态。在装载这些有机膦酸酯基团后,原始的片状形态消失,并且材料与较小的颗粒一致。然而,有机膦酸基的负载扩大了层间距离。值得注意的是,这些材料具有更强的去除Sr2+的能力,比α-ZrP具有更高的吸附能力,尤其是ZrP-ATMP,因为它的层距离更宽。ZrP HEDP、ZrP ATMP、ZrP EDTMP和ZrP DETPMP对Sr2+的最大吸附容量分别为158 mg g−1、175 mg g−2、115 mg g−3和76 mg g−4,而α-ZrP的最大吸附量为55 mg g−5。这些膦酸锆材料更高的吸附能力归因于它们更宽的层间距,为Sr2+的移动提供了更多的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of adsorption properties of zirconium (IV) phosphonates for removal of 90Sr

With as goal of improving on traditional α-ZrP, four zirconium phosphonate materials were prepared as potential adsorbents for the removal of 90Sr from nuclear wastewater. A typical sol–gel method was used, for phosphonates: hydroxy ethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP), amino tri-(methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP), ethylene diamine tetra-(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP), and diethylenetriamine penta-(methylenephosphonic acid) (DETPMP) to give ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively. These materials exhibit a similar crystalline phase to α-ZrP, but have a completely different morphology. After loading of these organophosphonate groups, the original sheet-morphology disappears, and the materials were consistent with smaller particles. However, the loading of organophosphonate groups expands the inter-layer distances. Remarkably, these materials have a stronger ability to remove Sr2+, with higher adsorption capacity than α-ZrP, especially ZrP-ATMP due to its wider layer distance. The maximum adsorption capacities for Sr2+ are 158 mg g−1, 175 mg g−1, 115 mg g−1 and 76 mg g−1for ZrP-HEDP, ZrP-ATMP, ZrP-EDTMP and ZrP-DETPMP, respectively, while that ofα-ZrP is 55 mg g−1. The higher adsorption capacities of these zirconium phosphonate materials is attributed to their wider interlayer spacing, allowing more room for Sr2+ to move.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信