用皮疹分析验证两种第二语言自我效能感量表

Jonathan Phipps
{"title":"用皮疹分析验证两种第二语言自我效能感量表","authors":"Jonathan Phipps","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study seeks to validate two instruments designed to measure second and foreign language speaking self-efficacy. One-hundred and ninety first- and second-year Japanese university students participated in this study. Analyses based on the Rasch model focused on key aspects of validity based the work of Wolf and Smith (2007) as well as Messick's validation framework. Findings indicated that (1) the instruments displayed high item and person reliability and separation, (2) there was a sufficient spread of items considering the variable response levels, though some redundancies occurred in the items and the final step in the Likert scale for one instrument was beyond the level of endorsement for the participants in the current study, (3) the vast majority of items showed an excellent fit with the Rasch model, (4) the rating scales matched all criteria for optimal functioning proposed by Linacre, (5) the items displayed an acceptable degree of unidimensionality, and (6) the items showed a high degree of measurement invariance. Teachers and researchers may take advantage of the two validated instruments to gage L2 learners’ self-efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The validation of two L2 self-efficacy instruments using rasch analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Phipps\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study seeks to validate two instruments designed to measure second and foreign language speaking self-efficacy. One-hundred and ninety first- and second-year Japanese university students participated in this study. Analyses based on the Rasch model focused on key aspects of validity based the work of Wolf and Smith (2007) as well as Messick's validation framework. Findings indicated that (1) the instruments displayed high item and person reliability and separation, (2) there was a sufficient spread of items considering the variable response levels, though some redundancies occurred in the items and the final step in the Likert scale for one instrument was beyond the level of endorsement for the participants in the current study, (3) the vast majority of items showed an excellent fit with the Rasch model, (4) the rating scales matched all criteria for optimal functioning proposed by Linacre, (5) the items displayed an acceptable degree of unidimensionality, and (6) the items showed a high degree of measurement invariance. Teachers and researchers may take advantage of the two validated instruments to gage L2 learners’ self-efficacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在验证两种旨在测量第二语言和外语口语自我效能感的工具。190名一年级和二年级的日本大学生参与了这项研究。基于Rasch模型的分析基于Wolf和Smith(2007)的工作以及Messick的验证框架,重点关注有效性的关键方面。研究结果表明,(1)这些工具显示出较高的项目和人员可靠性和分离性,(2)考虑到可变的反应水平,项目有足够的分布,尽管项目中出现了一些冗余,并且一个工具的Likert量表的最后一步超出了当前研究参与者的认可水平,(3)绝大多数项目显示出与Rasch模型的良好拟合,(4)评分量表与Linacre提出的所有最佳功能标准相匹配,(5)项目显示出可接受的单维度程度,以及(6)项目显示了高度的测量不变性。教师和研究人员可以利用这两种经过验证的工具来衡量二语学习者的自我效能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The validation of two L2 self-efficacy instruments using rasch analysis

This study seeks to validate two instruments designed to measure second and foreign language speaking self-efficacy. One-hundred and ninety first- and second-year Japanese university students participated in this study. Analyses based on the Rasch model focused on key aspects of validity based the work of Wolf and Smith (2007) as well as Messick's validation framework. Findings indicated that (1) the instruments displayed high item and person reliability and separation, (2) there was a sufficient spread of items considering the variable response levels, though some redundancies occurred in the items and the final step in the Likert scale for one instrument was beyond the level of endorsement for the participants in the current study, (3) the vast majority of items showed an excellent fit with the Rasch model, (4) the rating scales matched all criteria for optimal functioning proposed by Linacre, (5) the items displayed an acceptable degree of unidimensionality, and (6) the items showed a high degree of measurement invariance. Teachers and researchers may take advantage of the two validated instruments to gage L2 learners’ self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信