经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术:需要更小的支架直径来优化压力反应

Martin Rössle , Dominik Bettinger , Robert Thimme , Michael Schultheiss
{"title":"经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术:需要更小的支架直径来优化压力反应","authors":"Martin Rössle ,&nbsp;Dominik Bettinger ,&nbsp;Robert Thimme ,&nbsp;Michael Schultheiss","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2023.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The present treatment goal of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a portosystemic pressure gradient of ≤12 mmHg or its reduction by &gt;50%. This study relates the stent diameter to the reduction of the pressure gradient and attempts to predict the appropriate stent diameter necessary to reach the treatment goal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pressure response, super response, and poor response were investigated in 208 de-novo TIPS patients and defined as post-TIPS gradients between &gt;6 and 12 mmHg, ≤6 mmHg, or not reaching the goal (&gt;12 mmHg, reduction &lt;50%), respectively. Pressures were related to the smallest stent diameters measured by planimetry of the radiographic image.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responders (65%), super responders (26%), or poor responders (9%) had comparable stent diameters of 7.2 ± 1.0 mm, but different post-TIPS gradients (9.7 ± 1.9 mmHg, 4.5 ± 1.5 mmHg, and 14.2 ± 1.4 mmHg, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), relative reduction of pre-TIPS gradients (51.7 ± 11.4%, 73.6 ± 11.1%, and 34.0 ± 9.1%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and specific reduction per mm of stent diameter (7.5 ± 2.0%/mm, 10.1 ± 2.0%/mm, and 4.8 ± 1.4%/mm, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Prediction of the stent diameter required to reach response was not possible. Only two super responders had a stent diameter of &lt;6 mm. Super and poor responders differed by the increase in the right atrial pressure (+5.0 mmHg vs. +3.1 mmHg, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and reduction in the portal vein pressure (−8.6 mmHg vs. −4.6 mmHg, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most patients reached the treatment goal with stent diameters of &lt;8 mm. Overtreatment (super response, gradient ≤6 mmHg) can be prevented by stent diameters as small as 6 mm. The individual response was not related to the stent diameter and not predictable. Cardiac dysfunction may play an important role by its effect on the right atrial (preload) and portal pressure (afterload).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Smaller stent diameters are required to optimize pressure response\",\"authors\":\"Martin Rössle ,&nbsp;Dominik Bettinger ,&nbsp;Robert Thimme ,&nbsp;Michael Schultheiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iliver.2023.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The present treatment goal of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a portosystemic pressure gradient of ≤12 mmHg or its reduction by &gt;50%. This study relates the stent diameter to the reduction of the pressure gradient and attempts to predict the appropriate stent diameter necessary to reach the treatment goal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pressure response, super response, and poor response were investigated in 208 de-novo TIPS patients and defined as post-TIPS gradients between &gt;6 and 12 mmHg, ≤6 mmHg, or not reaching the goal (&gt;12 mmHg, reduction &lt;50%), respectively. Pressures were related to the smallest stent diameters measured by planimetry of the radiographic image.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responders (65%), super responders (26%), or poor responders (9%) had comparable stent diameters of 7.2 ± 1.0 mm, but different post-TIPS gradients (9.7 ± 1.9 mmHg, 4.5 ± 1.5 mmHg, and 14.2 ± 1.4 mmHg, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), relative reduction of pre-TIPS gradients (51.7 ± 11.4%, 73.6 ± 11.1%, and 34.0 ± 9.1%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and specific reduction per mm of stent diameter (7.5 ± 2.0%/mm, 10.1 ± 2.0%/mm, and 4.8 ± 1.4%/mm, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Prediction of the stent diameter required to reach response was not possible. Only two super responders had a stent diameter of &lt;6 mm. Super and poor responders differed by the increase in the right atrial pressure (+5.0 mmHg vs. +3.1 mmHg, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and reduction in the portal vein pressure (−8.6 mmHg vs. −4.6 mmHg, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most patients reached the treatment goal with stent diameters of &lt;8 mm. Overtreatment (super response, gradient ≤6 mmHg) can be prevented by stent diameters as small as 6 mm. The individual response was not related to the stent diameter and not predictable. Cardiac dysfunction may play an important role by its effect on the right atrial (preload) and portal pressure (afterload).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLIVER\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLIVER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947823000233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947823000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)目前的治疗目标是门体压力梯度≤12 mmHg或降低>;50%。本研究将支架直径与压力梯度的减小联系起来,并试图预测达到治疗目标所需的适当支架直径。方法对208例新发TIPS患者的压力反应、超反应和不良反应进行研究,并将其定义为>;6和12 mmHg,≤6 mmHg,或未达到目标(>;12 mmHg、降低<;50%)。压力与通过放射线图像的平面测量测量的最小支架直径有关。结果应答者(65%)、超应答者(26%)或不良应答者(9%)的支架直径为7.2±1.0mm,但TIPS后梯度不同(9.7±1.9mmHg、4.5±1.5mmHg和14.2±1.4mmHg,p<0.001),TIPS前梯度相对降低(51.7±11.4%、73.6±11.1%和34.0±9.1%,p<001),以及每毫米支架直径的特异性减少(7.5±2.0%/毫米、10.1±2.0%/mm和4.8±1.4%/毫米,p<0.001)。无法预测达到反应所需的支架直径。只有两个超级应答者具有<;6毫米。超反应者和差反应者的差异在于右心房压升高(+5.0 mmHg vs.+3.1 mmHg,p=0.026)和门静脉压降低(-8.6 mmHg vs.-4.6 mmHg,p<;0.001);8毫米。小到6mm的支架直径可以防止过度治疗(超反应,梯度≤6mmHg)。个体反应与支架直径无关,也不可预测。心脏功能障碍可能通过其对右心房(前负荷)和门静脉压力(后负荷)的影响而发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Smaller stent diameters are required to optimize pressure response

Background and aims

The present treatment goal of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a portosystemic pressure gradient of ≤12 mmHg or its reduction by >50%. This study relates the stent diameter to the reduction of the pressure gradient and attempts to predict the appropriate stent diameter necessary to reach the treatment goal.

Methods

Pressure response, super response, and poor response were investigated in 208 de-novo TIPS patients and defined as post-TIPS gradients between >6 and 12 mmHg, ≤6 mmHg, or not reaching the goal (>12 mmHg, reduction <50%), respectively. Pressures were related to the smallest stent diameters measured by planimetry of the radiographic image.

Results

Responders (65%), super responders (26%), or poor responders (9%) had comparable stent diameters of 7.2 ± 1.0 mm, but different post-TIPS gradients (9.7 ± 1.9 mmHg, 4.5 ± 1.5 mmHg, and 14.2 ± 1.4 mmHg, p < 0.001), relative reduction of pre-TIPS gradients (51.7 ± 11.4%, 73.6 ± 11.1%, and 34.0 ± 9.1%, p < 0.001), and specific reduction per mm of stent diameter (7.5 ± 2.0%/mm, 10.1 ± 2.0%/mm, and 4.8 ± 1.4%/mm, p < 0.001). Prediction of the stent diameter required to reach response was not possible. Only two super responders had a stent diameter of <6 mm. Super and poor responders differed by the increase in the right atrial pressure (+5.0 mmHg vs. +3.1 mmHg, p = 0.026) and reduction in the portal vein pressure (−8.6 mmHg vs. −4.6 mmHg, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Most patients reached the treatment goal with stent diameters of <8 mm. Overtreatment (super response, gradient ≤6 mmHg) can be prevented by stent diameters as small as 6 mm. The individual response was not related to the stent diameter and not predictable. Cardiac dysfunction may play an important role by its effect on the right atrial (preload) and portal pressure (afterload).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信