经动脉化疗栓塞单独或联合不同方案治疗肝细胞癌的疗效和并发症:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络meta分析

Jingxin Yan , Manjun Deng , Ting Li , Changhao Dong , Minglan Wang , Shunyu Kong , Yingxing Guo , Haining Fan
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞单独或联合不同方案治疗肝细胞癌的疗效和并发症:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络meta分析","authors":"Jingxin Yan ,&nbsp;Manjun Deng ,&nbsp;Ting Li ,&nbsp;Changhao Dong ,&nbsp;Minglan Wang ,&nbsp;Shunyu Kong ,&nbsp;Yingxing Guo ,&nbsp;Haining Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for most intermediate-to-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. With the ongoing development of interventional therapies, TACE in combination with different protocols is being explored. A network meta-analysis to collect recent evidence in this field is required.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang database from their inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported TACE in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 67 RCTs assessing eight combination treatments were included. The quality of primary outcomes was from moderate to low. The Bayesian network meta-analysis confirmed that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation had the highest probability of 1-year survival rate and TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of 2-year survival rate. TACE alone had the highest probability of incidence of fever, TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of incidence of pain and TACE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection had the highest probability of incidence of nausea and vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This Bayesian network meta-analysis found that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed and TACE combined with sorafenib may benefit patients in terms of 1-year survival and 2-year survival, respectively. To confirm this conclusion, high-quality and well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 130-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and complications of transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Jingxin Yan ,&nbsp;Manjun Deng ,&nbsp;Ting Li ,&nbsp;Changhao Dong ,&nbsp;Minglan Wang ,&nbsp;Shunyu Kong ,&nbsp;Yingxing Guo ,&nbsp;Haining Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iliver.2023.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for most intermediate-to-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. With the ongoing development of interventional therapies, TACE in combination with different protocols is being explored. A network meta-analysis to collect recent evidence in this field is required.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang database from their inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported TACE in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 67 RCTs assessing eight combination treatments were included. The quality of primary outcomes was from moderate to low. The Bayesian network meta-analysis confirmed that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation had the highest probability of 1-year survival rate and TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of 2-year survival rate. TACE alone had the highest probability of incidence of fever, TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of incidence of pain and TACE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection had the highest probability of incidence of nausea and vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This Bayesian network meta-analysis found that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed and TACE combined with sorafenib may benefit patients in terms of 1-year survival and 2-year survival, respectively. To confirm this conclusion, high-quality and well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLIVER\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 130-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLIVER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947823000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947823000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景与目的经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)是大多数中晚期肝细胞癌的标准治疗方法。随着介入治疗的不断发展,TACE与不同方案的结合正在被探索。需要进行网络荟萃分析,以收集该领域的最新证据。方法从PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Embase、中国国家知识基础设施数据库、CochraneLibrary和万方数据库开始到2022年5月,我们搜索了报告TACE与不同方案联合治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果共纳入67项随机对照试验,评估8种联合治疗。主要结果的质量从中等到低。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析证实,TACE联合碘-125种子植入的1年生存率概率最高,TACE结合索拉非尼的2年生存率几率最高。单纯TACE发热发生率最高,TACE联合索拉非尼疼痛发生率最高;TACE联合经皮乙醇注射恶心呕吐发生率最高。结论该贝叶斯网络荟萃分析发现,TACE联合碘-125种子和TACE联合索拉非尼可分别使患者的1年生存期和2年生存期受益。为了证实这一结论,需要更大样本量的高质量、精心设计的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and complications of transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and aims

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for most intermediate-to-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. With the ongoing development of interventional therapies, TACE in combination with different protocols is being explored. A network meta-analysis to collect recent evidence in this field is required.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang database from their inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported TACE in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Results

In total, 67 RCTs assessing eight combination treatments were included. The quality of primary outcomes was from moderate to low. The Bayesian network meta-analysis confirmed that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation had the highest probability of 1-year survival rate and TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of 2-year survival rate. TACE alone had the highest probability of incidence of fever, TACE combined with sorafenib had the highest probability of incidence of pain and TACE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection had the highest probability of incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion

This Bayesian network meta-analysis found that TACE combined with iodine-125 seed and TACE combined with sorafenib may benefit patients in terms of 1-year survival and 2-year survival, respectively. To confirm this conclusion, high-quality and well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信