基于VOSviewer的药用植物科学生产及其抗新冠肺炎疗效综述及科学计量学分析

IF 4.7 Q1 ECOLOGY
Leonomir Córdoba-Tovar , Pablo Andrés Ramos Barón , José Marrugo-Negrete , Lilia L. Roa-Fuentes , M.P. Jonathan
{"title":"基于VOSviewer的药用植物科学生产及其抗新冠肺炎疗效综述及科学计量学分析","authors":"Leonomir Córdoba-Tovar ,&nbsp;Pablo Andrés Ramos Barón ,&nbsp;José Marrugo-Negrete ,&nbsp;Lilia L. Roa-Fuentes ,&nbsp;M.P. Jonathan","doi":"10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historically, numerous plants have been used to alleviate various diseases, particularly viral diseases (bronchitis, influenza virus and dengue virus). This review evaluated their therapeutic potential against Covid-19 and mapped the 10 most studied plants during the pandemic. The standardized protocol for systematic reviews (PRISMA-P) was developed in this study. All studies involving medicinal plants and their potential against Covid-19 infection were also considered. Two specific search fields “traditional medicine and Covid-19” and “medicinal plants and Covid-19” with appearance in the title, abstract and keywords were used to search for information. Only papers (review and original) published between 2020 and October 2021 were included. Short communications, letters to the editor, books and book chapters were excluded. A total of 24,046 articles were recorded among the four databases and an increase of 69% in publications for the 2021 search date, a higher percentage compared to the previous year (31%). China was the country with the highest production with 28% (2725 papers). The analysis of variance showed that the number of studies of <em>Nigella sativa</em> L. (1.62 ± 0.21; <em>p</em> = 0.02), <em>Glycyrrhiza glabra</em> L. (1.50 ± 0.32; <em>p</em> = 0.03), <em>Zingiber officinale</em> Roscoe (1.51 ± 0.32; <em>p</em> = 0.03) were statistically significant with respect to the other species. This is probably because these species show compounds with high antiviral spectrum. Despite the pharmacological potential found in medicinal plants, more large-scale clinical trials are still needed to demonstrate the efficacy of phytocompounds against viral diseases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7048,"journal":{"name":"生态学报","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 733-741"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific production on medicinal plants and their efficacy against Covid-19: A review and scientometric analysis based on VOSviewer\",\"authors\":\"Leonomir Córdoba-Tovar ,&nbsp;Pablo Andrés Ramos Barón ,&nbsp;José Marrugo-Negrete ,&nbsp;Lilia L. Roa-Fuentes ,&nbsp;M.P. Jonathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Historically, numerous plants have been used to alleviate various diseases, particularly viral diseases (bronchitis, influenza virus and dengue virus). This review evaluated their therapeutic potential against Covid-19 and mapped the 10 most studied plants during the pandemic. The standardized protocol for systematic reviews (PRISMA-P) was developed in this study. All studies involving medicinal plants and their potential against Covid-19 infection were also considered. Two specific search fields “traditional medicine and Covid-19” and “medicinal plants and Covid-19” with appearance in the title, abstract and keywords were used to search for information. Only papers (review and original) published between 2020 and October 2021 were included. Short communications, letters to the editor, books and book chapters were excluded. A total of 24,046 articles were recorded among the four databases and an increase of 69% in publications for the 2021 search date, a higher percentage compared to the previous year (31%). China was the country with the highest production with 28% (2725 papers). The analysis of variance showed that the number of studies of <em>Nigella sativa</em> L. (1.62 ± 0.21; <em>p</em> = 0.02), <em>Glycyrrhiza glabra</em> L. (1.50 ± 0.32; <em>p</em> = 0.03), <em>Zingiber officinale</em> Roscoe (1.51 ± 0.32; <em>p</em> = 0.03) were statistically significant with respect to the other species. This is probably because these species show compounds with high antiviral spectrum. Despite the pharmacological potential found in medicinal plants, more large-scale clinical trials are still needed to demonstrate the efficacy of phytocompounds against viral diseases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生态学报\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 733-741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生态学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872203222000804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872203222000804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

历史上,许多植物被用来缓解各种疾病,特别是病毒性疾病(支气管炎、流感病毒和登革热病毒)。这篇综述评估了它们对新冠肺炎的治疗潜力,并绘制了大流行期间研究最多的10种植物。本研究制定了系统评价标准化方案(PRISMA-P)。还考虑了所有涉及药用植物及其对抗新冠肺炎感染的潜力的研究。使用标题、摘要和关键字中出现的两个特定搜索字段“传统医学与新冠肺炎”和“药用植物与新冠肺炎”来搜索信息。仅包括2020年至2021年10月期间发表的论文(综述和原件)。不包括简短的通信、给编辑的信、书籍和书籍章节。四个数据库共记录了24046篇文章,截至2021年搜索日,出版物数量增加了69%,与前一年(31%)相比,这一比例更高。中国是产量最高的国家,产量为28%(2725篇)。方差分析表明,Nigella sativa L.(1.62±0.21;p=0.02)、Glycyrrhiza glabra L.(1.50±0.32;p=0.03)、姜(1.51±0.32,p=0.03)的研究数量与其他物种相比具有统计学意义。这可能是因为这些物种显示出具有高抗病毒谱的化合物。尽管在药用植物中发现了药理潜力,但仍需要更大规模的临床试验来证明植物化合物对病毒性疾病的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific production on medicinal plants and their efficacy against Covid-19: A review and scientometric analysis based on VOSviewer

Historically, numerous plants have been used to alleviate various diseases, particularly viral diseases (bronchitis, influenza virus and dengue virus). This review evaluated their therapeutic potential against Covid-19 and mapped the 10 most studied plants during the pandemic. The standardized protocol for systematic reviews (PRISMA-P) was developed in this study. All studies involving medicinal plants and their potential against Covid-19 infection were also considered. Two specific search fields “traditional medicine and Covid-19” and “medicinal plants and Covid-19” with appearance in the title, abstract and keywords were used to search for information. Only papers (review and original) published between 2020 and October 2021 were included. Short communications, letters to the editor, books and book chapters were excluded. A total of 24,046 articles were recorded among the four databases and an increase of 69% in publications for the 2021 search date, a higher percentage compared to the previous year (31%). China was the country with the highest production with 28% (2725 papers). The analysis of variance showed that the number of studies of Nigella sativa L. (1.62 ± 0.21; p = 0.02), Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (1.50 ± 0.32; p = 0.03), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (1.51 ± 0.32; p = 0.03) were statistically significant with respect to the other species. This is probably because these species show compounds with high antiviral spectrum. Despite the pharmacological potential found in medicinal plants, more large-scale clinical trials are still needed to demonstrate the efficacy of phytocompounds against viral diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生态学报
生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17028
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Our Journal publishes recent theories and novel experimental results in ecology, and facilitates academic exchange and discussions both domestically and abroad. It is expected that our journal will promote the development of and foster research talents for ecological studies in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信