复杂事实问答调查

Lingxi Zhang , Jing Zhang , Xirui Ke , Haoyang Li , Xinmei Huang , Zhonghui Shao , Shulin Cao , Xin Lv
{"title":"复杂事实问答调查","authors":"Lingxi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xirui Ke ,&nbsp;Haoyang Li ,&nbsp;Xinmei Huang ,&nbsp;Zhonghui Shao ,&nbsp;Shulin Cao ,&nbsp;Xin Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Answering complex factual questions has drawn a lot of attention. Researchers leverage various data sources to support complex QA, such as unstructured texts, structured knowledge graphs and relational databases, semi-structured web tables, or even hybrid data sources. However, although the ideas behind these approaches show similarity to some extent, there is not yet a consistent strategy to deal with various data sources. In this survey, we carefully examine how complex factual question answering has evolved across various data sources. We list the similarities among these approaches and group them into the analysis–extend–reason framework, despite the various question types and data sources that they focus on. We also address future directions for difficult factual question answering as well as the relevant benchmarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on complex factual question answering\",\"authors\":\"Lingxi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xirui Ke ,&nbsp;Haoyang Li ,&nbsp;Xinmei Huang ,&nbsp;Zhonghui Shao ,&nbsp;Shulin Cao ,&nbsp;Xin Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Answering complex factual questions has drawn a lot of attention. Researchers leverage various data sources to support complex QA, such as unstructured texts, structured knowledge graphs and relational databases, semi-structured web tables, or even hybrid data sources. However, although the ideas behind these approaches show similarity to some extent, there is not yet a consistent strategy to deal with various data sources. In this survey, we carefully examine how complex factual question answering has evolved across various data sources. We list the similarities among these approaches and group them into the analysis–extend–reason framework, despite the various question types and data sources that they focus on. We also address future directions for difficult factual question answering as well as the relevant benchmarks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI Open\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

回答复杂的事实问题引起了很多关注。研究人员利用各种数据源来支持复杂的QA,如非结构化文本、结构化知识图和关系数据库、半结构化web表,甚至混合数据源。然而,尽管这些方法背后的思想在某种程度上显示出相似性,但还没有一个一致的策略来处理各种数据源。在这项调查中,我们仔细研究了复杂的事实问题回答是如何在各种数据源中演变的。我们列出了这些方法之间的相似之处,并将它们分组到分析-扩展-原因框架中,尽管它们关注的问题类型和数据来源各不相同。我们还讨论了困难的事实问题回答的未来方向以及相关基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey on complex factual question answering

Answering complex factual questions has drawn a lot of attention. Researchers leverage various data sources to support complex QA, such as unstructured texts, structured knowledge graphs and relational databases, semi-structured web tables, or even hybrid data sources. However, although the ideas behind these approaches show similarity to some extent, there is not yet a consistent strategy to deal with various data sources. In this survey, we carefully examine how complex factual question answering has evolved across various data sources. We list the similarities among these approaches and group them into the analysis–extend–reason framework, despite the various question types and data sources that they focus on. We also address future directions for difficult factual question answering as well as the relevant benchmarks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信