突破性创新下的可重用性设计和产品重用

Vedat Verter , Tamer Boyaci , Michael Galbreth
{"title":"突破性创新下的可重用性设计和产品重用","authors":"Vedat Verter ,&nbsp;Tamer Boyaci ,&nbsp;Michael Galbreth","doi":"10.1016/j.samod.2023.100021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many industries, including consumer electronics and telecommunications equipment, are characterized with short product life-cycles, constant technological innovations, rapid product introductions, and fast obsolescence. Firms in such industries need to make frequent design changes to incorporate innovations, and the effort to keep up with the rate of technological change often leaves little room for the consideration of product reuse. In this paper, we study the design for reusability and product reuse decisions in the presence of both a known rate of incremental innovations and a stochastic rate of radical innovations over time. We formulate this problem as a Markov Decision Process. We provide both analytical and numerical results, the latter based on over 425,000 problem instances generated over the entire range of model parameters. Our steady-state results confirm the conventional wisdom that a higher probability of radical innovations would lead to reductions in the firm’s investments in reusability as well as the amount of reuse the firm ends up doing. Interestingly, the design for reusability decreases much more slowly than the actual reuse. We identify some specific scenarios, however, where there is no tradeoff between the possibility of radical innovations and the firms reusability and reuse decisions. Through computational experiments, we also provide insights into the negative impact of radical innovations on firm profits, but show that the environmental impact of increased radical innovation is not necessarily negative. Our results also have several implications for policy makers seeking to encourage reuse. In particular, increasing end-of-life costs through take-back legislation is a safe and effective policy lever.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101193,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design for reusability and product reuse under radical innovation\",\"authors\":\"Vedat Verter ,&nbsp;Tamer Boyaci ,&nbsp;Michael Galbreth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.samod.2023.100021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many industries, including consumer electronics and telecommunications equipment, are characterized with short product life-cycles, constant technological innovations, rapid product introductions, and fast obsolescence. Firms in such industries need to make frequent design changes to incorporate innovations, and the effort to keep up with the rate of technological change often leaves little room for the consideration of product reuse. In this paper, we study the design for reusability and product reuse decisions in the presence of both a known rate of incremental innovations and a stochastic rate of radical innovations over time. We formulate this problem as a Markov Decision Process. We provide both analytical and numerical results, the latter based on over 425,000 problem instances generated over the entire range of model parameters. Our steady-state results confirm the conventional wisdom that a higher probability of radical innovations would lead to reductions in the firm’s investments in reusability as well as the amount of reuse the firm ends up doing. Interestingly, the design for reusability decreases much more slowly than the actual reuse. We identify some specific scenarios, however, where there is no tradeoff between the possibility of radical innovations and the firms reusability and reuse decisions. Through computational experiments, we also provide insights into the negative impact of radical innovations on firm profits, but show that the environmental impact of increased radical innovation is not necessarily negative. Our results also have several implications for policy makers seeking to encourage reuse. In particular, increasing end-of-life costs through take-back legislation is a safe and effective policy lever.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667259623000073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667259623000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多行业,包括消费电子和电信设备,都具有产品生命周期短、技术创新不断、产品引进迅速和过时快的特点。这类行业的公司需要频繁地进行设计更改,以融入创新,而跟上技术变革速度的努力往往几乎没有考虑产品重复使用的空间。在本文中,我们研究了在已知增量创新率和随机激进创新率随时间变化的情况下,可重用性和产品重用决策的设计。我们将这个问题表述为马尔可夫决策过程。我们提供了分析和数值结果,后者基于在整个模型参数范围内生成的425000多个问题实例。我们的稳态结果证实了传统观点,即更高的激进创新概率将导致公司在可重用性方面的投资减少,以及公司最终进行的重用量减少。有趣的是,可重用性的设计降低得比实际的重用慢得多。然而,我们确定了一些特定的场景,在这些场景中,激进创新的可能性与企业的可重用性和重用决策之间没有权衡。通过计算实验,我们还深入了解了激进创新对企业利润的负面影响,但表明激进创新增加对环境的影响并不一定是负面的。我们的研究结果对寻求鼓励重复使用的政策制定者也有一些启示。特别是,通过收回立法增加报废成本是一种安全有效的政策杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design for reusability and product reuse under radical innovation

Many industries, including consumer electronics and telecommunications equipment, are characterized with short product life-cycles, constant technological innovations, rapid product introductions, and fast obsolescence. Firms in such industries need to make frequent design changes to incorporate innovations, and the effort to keep up with the rate of technological change often leaves little room for the consideration of product reuse. In this paper, we study the design for reusability and product reuse decisions in the presence of both a known rate of incremental innovations and a stochastic rate of radical innovations over time. We formulate this problem as a Markov Decision Process. We provide both analytical and numerical results, the latter based on over 425,000 problem instances generated over the entire range of model parameters. Our steady-state results confirm the conventional wisdom that a higher probability of radical innovations would lead to reductions in the firm’s investments in reusability as well as the amount of reuse the firm ends up doing. Interestingly, the design for reusability decreases much more slowly than the actual reuse. We identify some specific scenarios, however, where there is no tradeoff between the possibility of radical innovations and the firms reusability and reuse decisions. Through computational experiments, we also provide insights into the negative impact of radical innovations on firm profits, but show that the environmental impact of increased radical innovation is not necessarily negative. Our results also have several implications for policy makers seeking to encourage reuse. In particular, increasing end-of-life costs through take-back legislation is a safe and effective policy lever.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信