Felipe Bedoya , Frederic Beugnet , Emilia Tobias , Erick Garcia-Mendizabal , Samantha Hay-Parker , Nancy Montes , Jose Uribe , Enrique Mondaca
{"title":"墨西哥不同州诊所和狗收容所埃利希体、无形体、伯氏疏螺旋体和免疫Dirofilaria的血清流行率的地理分析","authors":"Felipe Bedoya , Frederic Beugnet , Emilia Tobias , Erick Garcia-Mendizabal , Samantha Hay-Parker , Nancy Montes , Jose Uribe , Enrique Mondaca","doi":"10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp., <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> and <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided into eight geographical regions; 22 out of 32 states were included; 110 veterinary clinics and 53 dog shelters participated. SNAP® 4Dx Plus® (IDEXX® Laboratories) was used to detect antibodies against <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp., <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> and <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> antigens. A total of 3522 apparently healthy dogs were tested, 1648 from clinics and 1874 from shelters. The highest seroprevalence of infection/exposure was found for <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp<em>.</em> (30.9%), followed by <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. (14.6%), <em>D. immitis</em> (5.3%) and <em>B. burgdorferi</em> (0.1%). Significantly more positive dogs were older than 3 years. Regarding differences between facility types, there were only differences for <em>D. immitis</em> which was more prevalent in clinics than in shelters (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45–2.69; <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Co-infections were detected in 38.4% of the positive samples<em>.</em> Dogs from Mexican states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coast were significantly more at risk for <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. and <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. infections than dogs from interior states. Dogs in Atlantic coastal states were more at risk for <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94311,"journal":{"name":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Bedoya , Frederic Beugnet , Emilia Tobias , Erick Garcia-Mendizabal , Samantha Hay-Parker , Nancy Montes , Jose Uribe , Enrique Mondaca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp., <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> and <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided into eight geographical regions; 22 out of 32 states were included; 110 veterinary clinics and 53 dog shelters participated. SNAP® 4Dx Plus® (IDEXX® Laboratories) was used to detect antibodies against <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp., <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> and <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> antigens. A total of 3522 apparently healthy dogs were tested, 1648 from clinics and 1874 from shelters. The highest seroprevalence of infection/exposure was found for <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp<em>.</em> (30.9%), followed by <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. (14.6%), <em>D. immitis</em> (5.3%) and <em>B. burgdorferi</em> (0.1%). Significantly more positive dogs were older than 3 years. Regarding differences between facility types, there were only differences for <em>D. immitis</em> which was more prevalent in clinics than in shelters (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45–2.69; <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Co-infections were detected in 38.4% of the positive samples<em>.</em> Dogs from Mexican states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coast were significantly more at risk for <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. and <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. infections than dogs from interior states. Dogs in Atlantic coastal states were more at risk for <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> infection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667114X22000383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667114X22000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states
This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided into eight geographical regions; 22 out of 32 states were included; 110 veterinary clinics and 53 dog shelters participated. SNAP® 4Dx Plus® (IDEXX® Laboratories) was used to detect antibodies against Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigens. A total of 3522 apparently healthy dogs were tested, 1648 from clinics and 1874 from shelters. The highest seroprevalence of infection/exposure was found for Ehrlichia spp. (30.9%), followed by Anaplasma spp. (14.6%), D. immitis (5.3%) and B. burgdorferi (0.1%). Significantly more positive dogs were older than 3 years. Regarding differences between facility types, there were only differences for D. immitis which was more prevalent in clinics than in shelters (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45–2.69; P < 0.0001). Co-infections were detected in 38.4% of the positive samples. Dogs from Mexican states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coast were significantly more at risk for Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. infections than dogs from interior states. Dogs in Atlantic coastal states were more at risk for Dirofilaria immitis infection.