学龄前儿童内群体行为对满足延迟的不对称影响

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kaichi Yanaoka , Kiri Nishida , Toshihiko Endo
{"title":"学龄前儿童内群体行为对满足延迟的不对称影响","authors":"Kaichi Yanaoka ,&nbsp;Kiri Nishida ,&nbsp;Toshihiko Endo","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research has examined factors underlying the individual differences in delay gratification as childhood delay gratification predicts later life outcomes. Recent studies have focused on group behavior as a critical social factor affecting delay gratification. Here, our three preregistered experiments investigated whether ingroup behaviors encouraged and/or discouraged young children from selecting delayed options in a delay choice gratification test. Experiments 1 and 3 consistently found that 3–6-year-olds were less likely to select delayed choices when they believed that ingroup members selected immediate choices compared to when they had no information on members' behavior. In contrast, their performance on delaying gratification did not differ when they were informed that ingroup members select delayed choices versus when they had no ingroup information. However, these patterns were not observed in Experiment 2, which targeted 5- to 6-year-olds. Furthermore, Experiment 3 found that 3–6-year-olds did not change their evaluation of delay of gratification (e.g., preferred new individuals who delayed), even if ingroup members selected either immediate or delayed choices. Although these findings were supported by weak to moderate evidence with Bayesian analyses, we showed the asymmetric impact of ingroup behaviors on delay gratification in preschoolers. The current study potentially contributes to the understanding of how social factors shape delayed gratification in children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric impacts of ingroup behaviors on delay of gratification in preschoolers\",\"authors\":\"Kaichi Yanaoka ,&nbsp;Kiri Nishida ,&nbsp;Toshihiko Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research has examined factors underlying the individual differences in delay gratification as childhood delay gratification predicts later life outcomes. Recent studies have focused on group behavior as a critical social factor affecting delay gratification. Here, our three preregistered experiments investigated whether ingroup behaviors encouraged and/or discouraged young children from selecting delayed options in a delay choice gratification test. Experiments 1 and 3 consistently found that 3–6-year-olds were less likely to select delayed choices when they believed that ingroup members selected immediate choices compared to when they had no information on members' behavior. In contrast, their performance on delaying gratification did not differ when they were informed that ingroup members select delayed choices versus when they had no ingroup information. However, these patterns were not observed in Experiment 2, which targeted 5- to 6-year-olds. Furthermore, Experiment 3 found that 3–6-year-olds did not change their evaluation of delay of gratification (e.g., preferred new individuals who delayed), even if ingroup members selected either immediate or delayed choices. Although these findings were supported by weak to moderate evidence with Bayesian analyses, we showed the asymmetric impact of ingroup behaviors on delay gratification in preschoolers. The current study potentially contributes to the understanding of how social factors shape delayed gratification in children.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000862\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究考察了延迟满足的个体差异背后的因素,因为童年延迟满足预测了以后的生活结果。最近的研究将群体行为作为影响延迟满足的关键社会因素。在这里,我们的三个预先注册的实验调查了在延迟选择满足测试中,组内行为是否鼓励和/或劝阻幼儿选择延迟选择。实验1和3一致发现,与没有成员行为信息的情况相比,当3-6岁的孩子认为小组内成员选择了即时选择时,他们选择延迟选择的可能性较小。相反,当他们被告知组内成员选择延迟选择时,与没有组内信息时相比,他们在延迟满足方面的表现没有差异。然而,在针对5至6岁儿童的实验2中没有观察到这些模式。此外,实验3发现,3-6岁的儿童不会改变他们对延迟满足的评估(例如,更喜欢延迟的新个体),即使小组成员选择了立即或延迟的选择。尽管这些发现得到了贝叶斯分析的弱到中等证据的支持,但我们显示了学龄前儿童群体内行为对延迟满足的不对称影响。目前的研究可能有助于理解社会因素如何影响儿童的延迟满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asymmetric impacts of ingroup behaviors on delay of gratification in preschoolers

Research has examined factors underlying the individual differences in delay gratification as childhood delay gratification predicts later life outcomes. Recent studies have focused on group behavior as a critical social factor affecting delay gratification. Here, our three preregistered experiments investigated whether ingroup behaviors encouraged and/or discouraged young children from selecting delayed options in a delay choice gratification test. Experiments 1 and 3 consistently found that 3–6-year-olds were less likely to select delayed choices when they believed that ingroup members selected immediate choices compared to when they had no information on members' behavior. In contrast, their performance on delaying gratification did not differ when they were informed that ingroup members select delayed choices versus when they had no ingroup information. However, these patterns were not observed in Experiment 2, which targeted 5- to 6-year-olds. Furthermore, Experiment 3 found that 3–6-year-olds did not change their evaluation of delay of gratification (e.g., preferred new individuals who delayed), even if ingroup members selected either immediate or delayed choices. Although these findings were supported by weak to moderate evidence with Bayesian analyses, we showed the asymmetric impact of ingroup behaviors on delay gratification in preschoolers. The current study potentially contributes to the understanding of how social factors shape delayed gratification in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信