变道和拥堵是相辅相成的吗?

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Yang Gao, David Levinson
{"title":"变道和拥堵是相辅相成的吗?","authors":"Yang Gao,&nbsp;David Levinson","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between congestion and lane changing, using vehicle trajectory data from the M1 motorway in Sydney. We establish a connection between the distribution of travel time and lane changing frequency and employ a Poisson process to describe the intensity of lane changing occurrences in different travel time ranges. From an individual perspective, lane changing does not bring significant speed benefits in most cases, except when the speed range is between 45 and 50 ​km/h. From a system perspective, the relationship between lane change rate and speed depends on the purpose of the lane changes. In merging, diverging, and lane restriction areas, for instance, mandatory lane changes dominate. In most sections of the motorway, discretionary lane changes are motivated by the expectation of improving speed and/or safety. Additionally, we demonstrate a mutual causality relationship between lane changing and congestion through the Granger causality test. This relationship is more pronounced in general areas during peak periods and contributes to the deterioration of the driving environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lane changing and congestion are mutually reinforcing?\",\"authors\":\"Yang Gao,&nbsp;David Levinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between congestion and lane changing, using vehicle trajectory data from the M1 motorway in Sydney. We establish a connection between the distribution of travel time and lane changing frequency and employ a Poisson process to describe the intensity of lane changing occurrences in different travel time ranges. From an individual perspective, lane changing does not bring significant speed benefits in most cases, except when the speed range is between 45 and 50 ​km/h. From a system perspective, the relationship between lane change rate and speed depends on the purpose of the lane changes. In merging, diverging, and lane restriction areas, for instance, mandatory lane changes dominate. In most sections of the motorway, discretionary lane changes are motivated by the expectation of improving speed and/or safety. Additionally, we demonstrate a mutual causality relationship between lane changing and congestion through the Granger causality test. This relationship is more pronounced in general areas during peak periods and contributes to the deterioration of the driving environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究利用悉尼M1高速公路的车辆轨迹数据,对拥堵和变道之间的关系进行了全面分析。我们在行驶时间的分布和变道频率之间建立了联系,并采用泊松过程来描述不同行驶时间范围内变道发生的强度。从个人角度来看,在大多数情况下,变道不会带来显著的速度优势,除非速度范围在45到50之间​公里/小时。从系统角度来看,变道率和速度之间的关系取决于变道的目的。例如,在合流、分流和车道限制区域,强制变道占主导地位。在高速公路的大多数路段,出于对提高速度和/或安全性的期望,可以随意改变车道。此外,我们通过格兰杰因果检验证明了变道和拥堵之间的相互因果关系。这种关系在高峰时段的一般区域更为明显,并导致驾驶环境恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lane changing and congestion are mutually reinforcing?

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between congestion and lane changing, using vehicle trajectory data from the M1 motorway in Sydney. We establish a connection between the distribution of travel time and lane changing frequency and employ a Poisson process to describe the intensity of lane changing occurrences in different travel time ranges. From an individual perspective, lane changing does not bring significant speed benefits in most cases, except when the speed range is between 45 and 50 ​km/h. From a system perspective, the relationship between lane change rate and speed depends on the purpose of the lane changes. In merging, diverging, and lane restriction areas, for instance, mandatory lane changes dominate. In most sections of the motorway, discretionary lane changes are motivated by the expectation of improving speed and/or safety. Additionally, we demonstrate a mutual causality relationship between lane changing and congestion through the Granger causality test. This relationship is more pronounced in general areas during peak periods and contributes to the deterioration of the driving environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信