Jenna L Vieira, Bailee L Malivoire, Naomi Koerner, David Sumantry
{"title":"对焦虑和保持自我距离作为高焦虑个体引发焦虑经历的应对策略的研究。","authors":"Jenna L Vieira, Bailee L Malivoire, Naomi Koerner, David Sumantry","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2023.2270417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This preliminary online study investigated the short-term effects of self-distancing, worry, and distraction on anxiety and worry-related appraisals among individuals high in worry.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong><i>N</i> = 104 community members high in trait worry were randomly assigned to think about a personally identified worry-provoking situation using self-distancing (SC), worry (WC), or distraction (DC). Participants rated their anxiety (Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety) and appraisals of the situation (Perceived Probability, Coping, and Cost Questions) at post-task and one-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed factorial ANOVAs revealed an increase in anxiety within the WC (<i>d</i> = .475) and no difference in anxiety within the SC (<i>d</i> = .010) from pre- to post-task. There was no difference in anxiety within the DC (<i>p</i> = .177). Participants within the SC reported a decrease in the perceived cost associated with their identified situation from pre- to post-task (<i>d</i> = .424), which was maintained at one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .034). Participants reported an increase in perceived ability to cope from post-task to one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .236), and from pre-task to one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .338), regardless of condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-distancing may prevent increases in anxiety and catastrophizing while reflecting on a feared situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"515-528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An examination of worry and self-distancing as coping strategies for anxiety-provoking experiences in individuals high in worry.\",\"authors\":\"Jenna L Vieira, Bailee L Malivoire, Naomi Koerner, David Sumantry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2023.2270417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This preliminary online study investigated the short-term effects of self-distancing, worry, and distraction on anxiety and worry-related appraisals among individuals high in worry.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong><i>N</i> = 104 community members high in trait worry were randomly assigned to think about a personally identified worry-provoking situation using self-distancing (SC), worry (WC), or distraction (DC). Participants rated their anxiety (Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety) and appraisals of the situation (Perceived Probability, Coping, and Cost Questions) at post-task and one-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed factorial ANOVAs revealed an increase in anxiety within the WC (<i>d</i> = .475) and no difference in anxiety within the SC (<i>d</i> = .010) from pre- to post-task. There was no difference in anxiety within the DC (<i>p</i> = .177). Participants within the SC reported a decrease in the perceived cost associated with their identified situation from pre- to post-task (<i>d</i> = .424), which was maintained at one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .034). Participants reported an increase in perceived ability to cope from post-task to one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .236), and from pre-task to one-day follow-up (<i>d</i> = .338), regardless of condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-distancing may prevent increases in anxiety and catastrophizing while reflecting on a feared situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"515-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2270417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2270417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An examination of worry and self-distancing as coping strategies for anxiety-provoking experiences in individuals high in worry.
Objectives: This preliminary online study investigated the short-term effects of self-distancing, worry, and distraction on anxiety and worry-related appraisals among individuals high in worry.
Design and methods: N = 104 community members high in trait worry were randomly assigned to think about a personally identified worry-provoking situation using self-distancing (SC), worry (WC), or distraction (DC). Participants rated their anxiety (Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety) and appraisals of the situation (Perceived Probability, Coping, and Cost Questions) at post-task and one-day follow-up.
Results: Mixed factorial ANOVAs revealed an increase in anxiety within the WC (d = .475) and no difference in anxiety within the SC (d = .010) from pre- to post-task. There was no difference in anxiety within the DC (p = .177). Participants within the SC reported a decrease in the perceived cost associated with their identified situation from pre- to post-task (d = .424), which was maintained at one-day follow-up (d = .034). Participants reported an increase in perceived ability to cope from post-task to one-day follow-up (d = .236), and from pre-task to one-day follow-up (d = .338), regardless of condition.
Conclusions: Self-distancing may prevent increases in anxiety and catastrophizing while reflecting on a feared situation.
期刊介绍：
This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
