合并症、药物和健康的社会决定因素在理解心力衰竭患者城乡结局差异中的作用。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emily P. Zeitler MD, MHS, Joanna Joly MD, Christopher G. Leggett PhD, Sandra L. Wong MD, MS, A. James O'Malley PhD, Sally A. Kraft MD, MPH, Matthew B. Mackwood MD, MPH, Sarah T. Jones MPH, Jonathan S. Skinner PhD
{"title":"合并症、药物和健康的社会决定因素在理解心力衰竭患者城乡结局差异中的作用。","authors":"Emily P. Zeitler MD, MHS,&nbsp;Joanna Joly MD,&nbsp;Christopher G. Leggett PhD,&nbsp;Sandra L. Wong MD, MS,&nbsp;A. James O'Malley PhD,&nbsp;Sally A. Kraft MD, MPH,&nbsp;Matthew B. Mackwood MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sarah T. Jones MPH,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Skinner PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>There is now a 20% disparity in all-cause, excess deaths between urban and rural areas, much of which is driven by disparities in cardiovascular death. We sought to explain the sources of these disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a sample of Medicare Parts A, B, and D, we created a cohort of 389,528 fee-for-service beneficiaries with at least 1 heart failure hospitalization from 2008 to 2017. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after discharge; 1-year mortality, readmissions, and return emergency room (ER) admissions were secondary outcomes. We used hierarchical, logistic regression modeling to determine the contribution of comorbidities, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and social determinants of health (SDOH) to outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-day mortality rates after hospital discharge were 6.3% in rural areas compared to 5.7% in urban regions (<i>P</i> &lt; .001); after adjusting for patient health and GDMT receipt, the 30-day mortality odds ratio for rural residence was 1.201 (95% CI 1.164-1.239). Adding the SDOH measure reduced the odds ratio somewhat (1.140, 95% CI 1.103-1.178) but a gap remained. Readmission rates in rural areas were consistently lower for all model specifications, while ER admissions were consistently higher.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among patients with HFrEF, living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of death and return ER visits within 30 days of discharge from HF hospitalization. Differences in SDOH appear to partially explain mortality differences but the remaining gap may be the consequence of rural-urban differences in HF treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of comorbidities, medications, and social determinants of health in understanding urban-rural outcome differences among patients with heart failure\",\"authors\":\"Emily P. Zeitler MD, MHS,&nbsp;Joanna Joly MD,&nbsp;Christopher G. Leggett PhD,&nbsp;Sandra L. Wong MD, MS,&nbsp;A. James O'Malley PhD,&nbsp;Sally A. Kraft MD, MPH,&nbsp;Matthew B. Mackwood MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sarah T. Jones MPH,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Skinner PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is now a 20% disparity in all-cause, excess deaths between urban and rural areas, much of which is driven by disparities in cardiovascular death. We sought to explain the sources of these disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using a sample of Medicare Parts A, B, and D, we created a cohort of 389,528 fee-for-service beneficiaries with at least 1 heart failure hospitalization from 2008 to 2017. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after discharge; 1-year mortality, readmissions, and return emergency room (ER) admissions were secondary outcomes. We used hierarchical, logistic regression modeling to determine the contribution of comorbidities, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and social determinants of health (SDOH) to outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-day mortality rates after hospital discharge were 6.3% in rural areas compared to 5.7% in urban regions (<i>P</i> &lt; .001); after adjusting for patient health and GDMT receipt, the 30-day mortality odds ratio for rural residence was 1.201 (95% CI 1.164-1.239). Adding the SDOH measure reduced the odds ratio somewhat (1.140, 95% CI 1.103-1.178) but a gap remained. Readmission rates in rural areas were consistently lower for all model specifications, while ER admissions were consistently higher.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among patients with HFrEF, living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of death and return ER visits within 30 days of discharge from HF hospitalization. Differences in SDOH appear to partially explain mortality differences but the remaining gap may be the consequence of rural-urban differences in HF treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12803\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:现在,城市和农村地区的全因超额死亡人数相差20%,其中很大一部分是由心血管死亡人数的差异造成的。我们试图解释射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)医疗保险受益人的这些差异的来源。方法:使用医疗保险a、B和D部分的样本,我们为2008年至2017年至少有1次心力衰竭住院的服务受益人创建了389528人的费用队列。主要结果是出院后30天的死亡率;1年死亡率、再次入院和急诊室(ER)入院是次要结果。我们使用分层逻辑回归模型来确定合并症、指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)和健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)对结果的贡献。结果:农村地区出院后30天死亡率为6.3%,而城市地区为5.7%(P<.001);在对患者健康和GDMT接受情况进行调整后,农村居民的30天死亡率比值比为1.201(95%CI 1.164-1.239)。添加SDOH措施在一定程度上降低了比值比(1.140,95%CI 1.103-1.178),但仍有差距。农村地区所有型号规格的重新入学率一直较低,而急诊入院率一直较高。结论:在HFrEF患者中,生活在农村地区与HF住院出院后30天内死亡和急诊回访的风险增加有关。SDOH的差异似乎部分解释了死亡率差异,但剩余的差距可能是HF治疗城乡差异的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of comorbidities, medications, and social determinants of health in understanding urban-rural outcome differences among patients with heart failure

The role of comorbidities, medications, and social determinants of health in understanding urban-rural outcome differences among patients with heart failure

Purpose

There is now a 20% disparity in all-cause, excess deaths between urban and rural areas, much of which is driven by disparities in cardiovascular death. We sought to explain the sources of these disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods

Using a sample of Medicare Parts A, B, and D, we created a cohort of 389,528 fee-for-service beneficiaries with at least 1 heart failure hospitalization from 2008 to 2017. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after discharge; 1-year mortality, readmissions, and return emergency room (ER) admissions were secondary outcomes. We used hierarchical, logistic regression modeling to determine the contribution of comorbidities, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and social determinants of health (SDOH) to outcomes.

Results

Thirty-day mortality rates after hospital discharge were 6.3% in rural areas compared to 5.7% in urban regions (P < .001); after adjusting for patient health and GDMT receipt, the 30-day mortality odds ratio for rural residence was 1.201 (95% CI 1.164-1.239). Adding the SDOH measure reduced the odds ratio somewhat (1.140, 95% CI 1.103-1.178) but a gap remained. Readmission rates in rural areas were consistently lower for all model specifications, while ER admissions were consistently higher.

Conclusions

Among patients with HFrEF, living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of death and return ER visits within 30 days of discharge from HF hospitalization. Differences in SDOH appear to partially explain mortality differences but the remaining gap may be the consequence of rural-urban differences in HF treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信