利用全州电子健康记录数据的因果生存森林和G公式优化抗侵袭性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的动态抗生素治疗策略。

Inyoung Jun, Scott A Cohen, Sarah E Ser, Simone Marini, Robert J Lucero, Jiang Bian, Mattia Prosperi
{"title":"利用全州电子健康记录数据的因果生存森林和G公式优化抗侵袭性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的动态抗生素治疗策略。","authors":"Inyoung Jun, Scott A Cohen, Sarah E Ser, Simone Marini, Robert J Lucero, Jiang Bian, Mattia Prosperi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing models for individualized, time-varying treatment optimization from observational data with large variable spaces, e.g., electronic health records (EHR), is problematic because of inherent, complex bias that can change over time. Traditional methods such as the g-formula are robust, but must identify critical subsets of variables due to combinatorial issues. Machine learning approaches such as causal survival forests have fewer constraints and can provide fine-tuned, individualized counterfactual predictions. In this study, we aimed to optimize time-varying antibiotic treatment -identifying treatment heterogeneity and conditional treatment effects- against invasive methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> (MRSA) infections, using statewide EHR data collected in Florida, USA. While many previous studies focused on measuring the effects of the first empiric treatment (i.e., usually vancomycin), our study focuses on dynamic sequential treatment changes, comparing possible vancomycin switches with other antibiotics at clinically relevant time points, e.g., after obtaining a bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Our study population included adult individuals admitted to the hospital with invasive MRSA. We collected demographic, clinical, medication, and laboratory information from the EHR for these patients. Then, we followed three sequential antibiotic choices (i.e., their empiric treatment, subsequent directed treatment, and final sustaining treatment), evaluating 30-day mortality as the outcome. We applied both causal survival forests and g-formula using different clinical intervention policies. We found that switching from vancomycin to another antibiotic improved survival probability, yet there was a benefit from initiating vancomycin compared to not using it at any time point. These findings show consistency with the empiric choice of vancomycin before confirmation of MRSA and shed light on how to manage switches on course. In conclusion, this application of causal machine learning on EHR demonstrates utility in modeling dynamic, heterogeneous treatment effects that cannot be evaluated precisely using randomized clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":74504,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of machine learning research","volume":"218 ","pages":"98-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Dynamic Antibiotic Treatment Strategies against Invasive Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> Infections using Causal Survival Forests and G-Formula on Statewide Electronic Health Record Data.\",\"authors\":\"Inyoung Jun, Scott A Cohen, Sarah E Ser, Simone Marini, Robert J Lucero, Jiang Bian, Mattia Prosperi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Developing models for individualized, time-varying treatment optimization from observational data with large variable spaces, e.g., electronic health records (EHR), is problematic because of inherent, complex bias that can change over time. Traditional methods such as the g-formula are robust, but must identify critical subsets of variables due to combinatorial issues. Machine learning approaches such as causal survival forests have fewer constraints and can provide fine-tuned, individualized counterfactual predictions. In this study, we aimed to optimize time-varying antibiotic treatment -identifying treatment heterogeneity and conditional treatment effects- against invasive methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> (MRSA) infections, using statewide EHR data collected in Florida, USA. While many previous studies focused on measuring the effects of the first empiric treatment (i.e., usually vancomycin), our study focuses on dynamic sequential treatment changes, comparing possible vancomycin switches with other antibiotics at clinically relevant time points, e.g., after obtaining a bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Our study population included adult individuals admitted to the hospital with invasive MRSA. We collected demographic, clinical, medication, and laboratory information from the EHR for these patients. Then, we followed three sequential antibiotic choices (i.e., their empiric treatment, subsequent directed treatment, and final sustaining treatment), evaluating 30-day mortality as the outcome. We applied both causal survival forests and g-formula using different clinical intervention policies. We found that switching from vancomycin to another antibiotic improved survival probability, yet there was a benefit from initiating vancomycin compared to not using it at any time point. These findings show consistency with the empiric choice of vancomycin before confirmation of MRSA and shed light on how to manage switches on course. In conclusion, this application of causal machine learning on EHR demonstrates utility in modeling dynamic, heterogeneous treatment effects that cannot be evaluated precisely using randomized clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of machine learning research\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"98-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of machine learning research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of machine learning research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据具有大可变空间的观察数据,如电子健康记录(EHR),开发个性化、时变治疗优化模型是有问题的,因为固有的、复杂的偏差可能会随着时间的推移而变化。g公式等传统方法是稳健的,但由于组合问题,必须识别变量的关键子集。因果生存森林等机器学习方法具有较少的约束,可以提供微调的、个性化的反事实预测。在这项研究中,我们旨在利用在美国佛罗里达州收集的全州EHR数据,优化针对侵袭性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的时变抗生素治疗——确定治疗异质性和条件治疗效果,我们的研究重点是动态的序贯治疗变化,比较在临床相关时间点,例如在获得细菌培养和易感性测试后,可能的万古霉素转换与其他抗生素。我们的研究人群包括因侵袭性MRSA入院的成年个体。我们从EHR中收集了这些患者的人口统计学、临床、药物和实验室信息。然后,我们遵循三种连续的抗生素选择(即经验性治疗、随后的定向治疗和最终的持续治疗),评估30天的死亡率作为结果。我们使用不同的临床干预政策应用了因果生存森林和g公式。我们发现,从万古霉素改用另一种抗生素提高了生存概率,但与在任何时间点不使用万古霉素相比,使用万古霉素都有好处。这些发现表明,在确认MRSA之前,万古霉素的经验性选择是一致的,并为如何管理疗程切换提供了线索。总之,因果机器学习在EHR中的应用证明了其在建模动态、异质性治疗效果方面的实用性,这些效果无法使用随机临床试验进行精确评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing Dynamic Antibiotic Treatment Strategies against Invasive Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> Infections using Causal Survival Forests and G-Formula on Statewide Electronic Health Record Data.

Optimizing Dynamic Antibiotic Treatment Strategies against Invasive Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> Infections using Causal Survival Forests and G-Formula on Statewide Electronic Health Record Data.

Optimizing Dynamic Antibiotic Treatment Strategies against Invasive Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus Aureus</i> Infections using Causal Survival Forests and G-Formula on Statewide Electronic Health Record Data.

Optimizing Dynamic Antibiotic Treatment Strategies against Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections using Causal Survival Forests and G-Formula on Statewide Electronic Health Record Data.

Developing models for individualized, time-varying treatment optimization from observational data with large variable spaces, e.g., electronic health records (EHR), is problematic because of inherent, complex bias that can change over time. Traditional methods such as the g-formula are robust, but must identify critical subsets of variables due to combinatorial issues. Machine learning approaches such as causal survival forests have fewer constraints and can provide fine-tuned, individualized counterfactual predictions. In this study, we aimed to optimize time-varying antibiotic treatment -identifying treatment heterogeneity and conditional treatment effects- against invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infections, using statewide EHR data collected in Florida, USA. While many previous studies focused on measuring the effects of the first empiric treatment (i.e., usually vancomycin), our study focuses on dynamic sequential treatment changes, comparing possible vancomycin switches with other antibiotics at clinically relevant time points, e.g., after obtaining a bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Our study population included adult individuals admitted to the hospital with invasive MRSA. We collected demographic, clinical, medication, and laboratory information from the EHR for these patients. Then, we followed three sequential antibiotic choices (i.e., their empiric treatment, subsequent directed treatment, and final sustaining treatment), evaluating 30-day mortality as the outcome. We applied both causal survival forests and g-formula using different clinical intervention policies. We found that switching from vancomycin to another antibiotic improved survival probability, yet there was a benefit from initiating vancomycin compared to not using it at any time point. These findings show consistency with the empiric choice of vancomycin before confirmation of MRSA and shed light on how to manage switches on course. In conclusion, this application of causal machine learning on EHR demonstrates utility in modeling dynamic, heterogeneous treatment effects that cannot be evaluated precisely using randomized clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信