Ali Alqahtani , Abdurahman Alloghbi , Philip Coffin , Chao Yin , Reetu Mukherji , Benjamin A. Weinberg
{"title":"术前和术后KRAS突变循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)在切除的胰腺导管腺癌中的预后作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Alqahtani , Abdurahman Alloghbi , Philip Coffin , Chao Yin , Reetu Mukherji , Benjamin A. Weinberg","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative </span><em>KRAS</em><span><span>-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a </span>systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative </span><em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ali Alqahtani , Abdurahman Alloghbi , Philip Coffin , Chao Yin , Reetu Mukherji , Benjamin A. Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative </span><em>KRAS</em><span><span>-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a </span>systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative </span><em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096074042300107X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096074042300107X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.
Methods
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive KRAS-mutated ctDNA.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.