{"title":"十九世纪礼仪的编纂","authors":"Annick Paternoster","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00069.pat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a\n knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four\n countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of\n tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of\n etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is,\n schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a\n concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal\n aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically\n situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late\n eighteenth century, it is still in use today.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The codification of nineteenth-century etiquette\",\"authors\":\"Annick Paternoster\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00069.pat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a\\n knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four\\n countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of\\n tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of\\n etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is,\\n schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a\\n concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal\\n aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically\\n situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late\\n eighteenth century, it is still in use today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00069.pat\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00069.pat","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a
knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four
countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of
tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of
etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is,
schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a
concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal
aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically
situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late
eighteenth century, it is still in use today.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.