十九世纪礼仪的编纂

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Annick Paternoster
{"title":"十九世纪礼仪的编纂","authors":"Annick Paternoster","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00069.pat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a\n knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four\n countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of\n tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of\n etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is,\n schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a\n concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal\n aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically\n situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late\n eighteenth century, it is still in use today.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The codification of nineteenth-century etiquette\",\"authors\":\"Annick Paternoster\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00069.pat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a\\n knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four\\n countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of\\n tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of\\n etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is,\\n schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a\\n concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal\\n aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically\\n situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late\\n eighteenth century, it is still in use today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00069.pat\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00069.pat","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

礼仪只是勉强引起了礼貌学者的注意。本文旨在填补知识空白,以更系统的方式探索这一概念,使用来自四个国家(英国、法国、意大利和美国)的19世纪规定性交代。礼仪被发现形成了一个复杂的、包罗万象的、倾向性的、非道德的强制性规范,使法庭礼仪的细节适应私人环境。由于礼仪惯例是按顺序构建的具有社交把关功能的脚本,它们可以被视为仪式——也就是说,是情感投入的示意性、表演性互动。此外,考虑到强制性行为和对等级(优先级)的关注,礼仪被视为辨别的一种表现,尽管礼仪优先考虑互动的非语言方面,而较少关注语言建议。我认为“礼仪”是辨别分析概念的一个历史和地理位置的第一级术语:它于18世纪末在欧洲和北美出现,至今仍在使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The codification of nineteenth-century etiquette
Etiquette has only marginally attracted the attention of politeness scholars. This article aims to fill a knowledge gap as it explores the concept in a more systematic way, using nineteenth-century prescriptive metasources from four countries (Britain, France, Italy and the United States). Etiquette is found to form a complicated, all-encompassing body of tendentially amoral, mandatory norms, adapting the minutiae of court protocol to private settings. Since the conventions of etiquette are sequentially structured as scripts with a social gatekeeping function, they can be seen as rituals – that is, schematic, performative interaction that is emotionally invested. Furthermore, given the combination of mandatory behaviour and a concern for rank (precedence), etiquette is seen as a manifestation of Discernment, although etiquette privileges non-verbal aspects of interaction, with less attention for language advice. I consider “etiquette” to be a historically and geographically situated first-order term for the analytical concept of Discernment: emerging in Europe and in North America in the late eighteenth century, it is still in use today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信