经典按摩与轻触按摩对运动员心理和身体功能变量的比较:一项随机试点试验

Q2 Health Professions
Gemma Victoria Espí-López, PT, PhD, Pilar Serra-Añó, PT, PhD, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez , PT, MSc, Luis Suso-Martí, PT, MSc, Marta Inglés, PT, PhD
{"title":"经典按摩与轻触按摩对运动员心理和身体功能变量的比较:一项随机试点试验","authors":"Gemma Victoria Espí-López, PT, PhD, Pilar Serra-Añó, PT, PhD, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez , PT, MSc, Luis Suso-Martí, PT, MSc, Marta Inglés, PT, PhD","doi":"10.3822/IJTMB.V13I3.551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. Purpose The main objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. Setting Athletic club of Valencia Participants 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. Research Design A single-blind, randomized, pilot-placebo trial. Intervention The subjects were randomly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Control group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). Main Outcome Measures Assessment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee extension, and mood state. Results The results suggest that MG obtained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). Conclusion Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physiological measures.","PeriodicalId":39090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Victoria Espí-López, PT, PhD, Pilar Serra-Añó, PT, PhD, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez , PT, MSc, Luis Suso-Martí, PT, MSc, Marta Inglés, PT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.3822/IJTMB.V13I3.551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. Purpose The main objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. Setting Athletic club of Valencia Participants 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. Research Design A single-blind, randomized, pilot-placebo trial. Intervention The subjects were randomly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Control group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). Main Outcome Measures Assessment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee extension, and mood state. Results The results suggest that MG obtained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). Conclusion Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physiological measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3822/IJTMB.V13I3.551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3822/IJTMB.V13I3.551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景尽管人们普遍相信按摩的好处,并在体育领域广泛使用,但关于按摩对心理和身体功能变量可能有效性的经验数据有限。目的本研究的主要目的是比较经典和轻触摸按摩对运动员心理和身体功能变量的有效性。瓦伦西亚体育俱乐部参赛者从两个体育俱乐部招募了20名业余运动员。研究设计一项单盲、随机、先导性安慰剂试验。干预受试者被随机分为两组:a)按摩组(MG)(n=10);b) 对照组(CG)(n=10)。干预期为一个月(每周一次)。主要结果指标在基线和干预完成后24小时对参与者进行评估。结果测量包括髋关节屈曲、膝关节伸展和情绪状态。结果结果表明,MG在身体变量方面取得了更好的结果(p<0.05)。然而,对于两组来说,趋势都表明参与者的整体情绪状态有了显著改善(p<.05)。结论我们的结果表明,经典按摩可能是改善运动员功能性身体变量的有效干预措施。然而,趋势表明,轻度触摸干预可能会改善生理指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
Background Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. Purpose The main objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. Setting Athletic club of Valencia Participants 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. Research Design A single-blind, randomized, pilot-placebo trial. Intervention The subjects were randomly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Control group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). Main Outcome Measures Assessment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee extension, and mood state. Results The results suggest that MG obtained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). Conclusion Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physiological measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJTMB is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the research (methodological, physiological, and clinical) and professional development of therapeutic massage and bodywork and its providers, encompassing all allied health providers whose services include manually applied therapeutic massage and bodywork. The Journal provides a professional forum for editorial input; scientifically-based articles of a research, educational, and practice-oriented nature; readers’ commentaries on journal content and related professional matters; and pertinent news and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信