英国大教堂史。尼古拉斯·奥姆著。240毫米。第xii+304页,76页,15张地图和平面图。Impress Books,埃克塞特,2017。为9781907605925英镑。20.00英镑(pbk)。

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David Lepine
{"title":"英国大教堂史。尼古拉斯·奥姆著。240毫米。第xii+304页,76页,15张地图和平面图。Impress Books,埃克塞特,2017。为9781907605925英镑。20.00英镑(pbk)。","authors":"David Lepine","doi":"10.1017/S0003581521000111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"original discussion of this type of staircase in Zeitschrift für Archäologie des Mittelalters made it clear that it and its variants continued in use inmajor Romanesque buildings throughout the twelfth century, with examples in the cathedrals at Oxford and St David’s dated as late as × and × respectively. A viable unvaulted alternative does not appear to have been developed until the thirteenth century. The technique of the vaulted staircase may well have developed in the course of the twelfth century, but it was certainly not abandoned c , as the author implies. At the end of the final chapter Dr Shapland hopes ‘that this chapter has succeeded in rescuing Anglo-Saxon tower-nave churches from the status of an architectural curiosity to an influential part of the mainstream of early medieval built culture’. The section ‘Anglo-Saxon tower-naves and Norman castles’ certainly achieves that, introducing the concept of the ‘enmotted tower’ to show how the lordly tower formed the basis for the development of the Norman motte surmounted by a keep. It is worthy of remark that Towers of Lordship was published just over forty years after the appearance in volume  of the Archaeological Journal (coincidentally under my editorship) of ‘Five castle excavations’, the rather inconclusive report on the Royal Archaeological Institute’s project into the origins of the castle in England (Saunders et al ). So the towernave has secured a niche not only as a ‘coherent building type’ of Anglo-Saxon origin but as a major strand in the development of the castle as a symbol of status and military power. To that extent one might beg to question whether the book’s title underplays the full significance of its contribution to medieval building studies.","PeriodicalId":44308,"journal":{"name":"Antiquaries Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":"440 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0003581521000111","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The History of England’s Cathedrals. By Nicholas Orme. 240mm. Pp xii + 304, 76 col ills, 15 maps and plans. Impress Books, Exeter, 2017. isbn 9781907605925. £20.00 (pbk).\",\"authors\":\"David Lepine\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0003581521000111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"original discussion of this type of staircase in Zeitschrift für Archäologie des Mittelalters made it clear that it and its variants continued in use inmajor Romanesque buildings throughout the twelfth century, with examples in the cathedrals at Oxford and St David’s dated as late as × and × respectively. A viable unvaulted alternative does not appear to have been developed until the thirteenth century. The technique of the vaulted staircase may well have developed in the course of the twelfth century, but it was certainly not abandoned c , as the author implies. At the end of the final chapter Dr Shapland hopes ‘that this chapter has succeeded in rescuing Anglo-Saxon tower-nave churches from the status of an architectural curiosity to an influential part of the mainstream of early medieval built culture’. The section ‘Anglo-Saxon tower-naves and Norman castles’ certainly achieves that, introducing the concept of the ‘enmotted tower’ to show how the lordly tower formed the basis for the development of the Norman motte surmounted by a keep. It is worthy of remark that Towers of Lordship was published just over forty years after the appearance in volume  of the Archaeological Journal (coincidentally under my editorship) of ‘Five castle excavations’, the rather inconclusive report on the Royal Archaeological Institute’s project into the origins of the castle in England (Saunders et al ). So the towernave has secured a niche not only as a ‘coherent building type’ of Anglo-Saxon origin but as a major strand in the development of the castle as a symbol of status and military power. To that extent one might beg to question whether the book’s title underplays the full significance of its contribution to medieval building studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"440 - 442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0003581521000111\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581521000111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquaries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581521000111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《德意志大教堂》中对这种类型楼梯的最初讨论清楚地表明,它及其变体在整个12世纪仍在主要的罗马式建筑中使用,牛津和圣大卫大教堂的例子可以追溯到× 和× 分别地直到13世纪,一种可行的、未经检验的替代品似乎才被开发出来。拱形楼梯的技术很可能在12世纪发展起来,但它肯定没有被放弃, 正如作者所暗示的那样。在最后一章的结尾,沙普兰博士希望“这一章成功地将盎格鲁撒克逊塔楼中殿教堂从一种建筑好奇心的地位拯救为中世纪早期建筑文化主流中有影响力的一部分”。“盎格鲁-撒克逊塔楼和诺曼城堡”一节当然做到了这一点,引入了“镶嵌式塔楼”的概念,以展示这座庄严的塔楼是如何形成诺曼城堡发展的基础的。值得一提的是,《领主之塔》是在出版40多年后才出版的 《考古杂志》(巧合的是,由我担任编辑)关于“五座城堡的发掘”,这是一份关于英国皇家考古研究所对城堡起源项目的不确定报告(Saunders et al). 因此,塔楼不仅作为盎格鲁撒克逊起源的“连贯建筑类型”,而且作为城堡发展的主要部分,作为地位和军事力量的象征,获得了一席之地。在这种程度上,人们可能会质疑这本书的标题是否低估了它对中世纪建筑研究的全部贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The History of England’s Cathedrals. By Nicholas Orme. 240mm. Pp xii + 304, 76 col ills, 15 maps and plans. Impress Books, Exeter, 2017. isbn 9781907605925. £20.00 (pbk).
original discussion of this type of staircase in Zeitschrift für Archäologie des Mittelalters made it clear that it and its variants continued in use inmajor Romanesque buildings throughout the twelfth century, with examples in the cathedrals at Oxford and St David’s dated as late as × and × respectively. A viable unvaulted alternative does not appear to have been developed until the thirteenth century. The technique of the vaulted staircase may well have developed in the course of the twelfth century, but it was certainly not abandoned c , as the author implies. At the end of the final chapter Dr Shapland hopes ‘that this chapter has succeeded in rescuing Anglo-Saxon tower-nave churches from the status of an architectural curiosity to an influential part of the mainstream of early medieval built culture’. The section ‘Anglo-Saxon tower-naves and Norman castles’ certainly achieves that, introducing the concept of the ‘enmotted tower’ to show how the lordly tower formed the basis for the development of the Norman motte surmounted by a keep. It is worthy of remark that Towers of Lordship was published just over forty years after the appearance in volume  of the Archaeological Journal (coincidentally under my editorship) of ‘Five castle excavations’, the rather inconclusive report on the Royal Archaeological Institute’s project into the origins of the castle in England (Saunders et al ). So the towernave has secured a niche not only as a ‘coherent building type’ of Anglo-Saxon origin but as a major strand in the development of the castle as a symbol of status and military power. To that extent one might beg to question whether the book’s title underplays the full significance of its contribution to medieval building studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antiquaries Journal
Antiquaries Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信