私募股权基金的私募基准

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Christian Tausch, Markus J. Rieder, Philipp Abel
{"title":"私募股权基金的私募基准","authors":"Christian Tausch, Markus J. Rieder, Philipp Abel","doi":"10.3905/jai.2023.1.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Private equity (PE) funds, or more broadly private capital funds, can be benchmarked against public or private alternatives. Academic literature usually focuses exclusively on the public side. In this article, the authors investigate more-rigorous private peer group benchmarking methods beyond traditional “quartile ranking.” They focus mainly on both statistical and deterministic models for (1) peer group data enhancement, (2) handling very small peer groups, (3) simulation-based portfolio aggregation, and (4) the notion of maximum diversified private benchmarks. Ultimately, they discuss obtaining more-meaningful private benchmarks for a private capital portfolio.","PeriodicalId":45142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alternative Investments","volume":"26 1","pages":"96 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Benchmarking for Private Equity Funds\",\"authors\":\"Christian Tausch, Markus J. Rieder, Philipp Abel\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jai.2023.1.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Private equity (PE) funds, or more broadly private capital funds, can be benchmarked against public or private alternatives. Academic literature usually focuses exclusively on the public side. In this article, the authors investigate more-rigorous private peer group benchmarking methods beyond traditional “quartile ranking.” They focus mainly on both statistical and deterministic models for (1) peer group data enhancement, (2) handling very small peer groups, (3) simulation-based portfolio aggregation, and (4) the notion of maximum diversified private benchmarks. Ultimately, they discuss obtaining more-meaningful private benchmarks for a private capital portfolio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2023.1.192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alternative Investments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2023.1.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私募股权(PE)基金,或者更广泛地说,私人资本基金,可以与公共或私人替代基金进行比较。学术文献通常只关注公众。在这篇文章中,作者研究了超越传统“四分位数排名”的更严格的私人同行群体基准测试方法。他们主要关注统计和确定性模型,用于(1)同行群体数据增强,(2)处理非常小的同行群体,(3)基于模拟的投资组合聚合,以及(4)最大多样化私人基准的概念。最终,他们讨论为私人资本投资组合获得更有意义的私人基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Benchmarking for Private Equity Funds
Private equity (PE) funds, or more broadly private capital funds, can be benchmarked against public or private alternatives. Academic literature usually focuses exclusively on the public side. In this article, the authors investigate more-rigorous private peer group benchmarking methods beyond traditional “quartile ranking.” They focus mainly on both statistical and deterministic models for (1) peer group data enhancement, (2) handling very small peer groups, (3) simulation-based portfolio aggregation, and (4) the notion of maximum diversified private benchmarks. Ultimately, they discuss obtaining more-meaningful private benchmarks for a private capital portfolio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alternative Investments (JAI) provides you with cutting-edge research and expert analysis on managing investments in hedge funds, private equity, distressed debt, commodities and futures, energy, funds of funds, and other nontraditional assets. JAI is the official publication of the Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association (CAIA®). JAI provides you with challenging ideas and practical tools to: •Profit from the growth of hedge funds and alternatives •Determine the optimal mix of traditional and alternative investments •Measure and track portfolio performance •Manage your alternative investment portfolio with proven risk management practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信