可持续发展报告中的修辞艺术是否阻碍了保证实践?

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yosra Mnif, Jihene Kchaou
{"title":"可持续发展报告中的修辞艺术是否阻碍了保证实践?","authors":"Yosra Mnif, Jihene Kchaou","doi":"10.1108/ara-08-2022-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between the readability of sustainability reports and assurance provider effort, captured by assurance delay and the moderating effect of the assurance provider.Design/methodology/approachThis sample consists of companies operating in sustainability sensitive industries from 39 countries for the period that covers the years 2016–2018.FindingsThe results show that poor sustainability reporting readability is associated with longer assurance delays. Indeed, assurance providers spend more effort assuring clients when sustainability reports are less readable, as shown by long assurance delay. In addition, increases in assurance delay associated with poor sustainability reporting readability are driven by accounting assurance providers. These results hold after controlling for endogeneity using Heckman's (1979) analysis and other measures of assurance delay readability used in prior literature. By checking the specialization of assurance provider partners and setting aside dominant countries, the authors provide insight into the impact of assurance provider specialization on the association between sustainability report readability and assurance provider effort measured by assurance delay and thus, lending further confidence to the strength of the study’s main findings.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides preliminary evidence on the relationship between sustainability reporting readability and assurance delay as well as the influence of accounting assurance providers.Practical implicationsSustainability assurance practice is viewed as a tool to add or enhance credibility. This study could be considered as another step into driving the standardization of sustainability reporting practice internationally.Originality/valueThis is the first investigation conducted in the sustainability literature on the assurance provider's response to the readability of sustainability reports.","PeriodicalId":8562,"journal":{"name":"Asian Review of Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the rhetoric art in sustainability reports obstruct the assurance practice?\",\"authors\":\"Yosra Mnif, Jihene Kchaou\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ara-08-2022-0202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between the readability of sustainability reports and assurance provider effort, captured by assurance delay and the moderating effect of the assurance provider.Design/methodology/approachThis sample consists of companies operating in sustainability sensitive industries from 39 countries for the period that covers the years 2016–2018.FindingsThe results show that poor sustainability reporting readability is associated with longer assurance delays. Indeed, assurance providers spend more effort assuring clients when sustainability reports are less readable, as shown by long assurance delay. In addition, increases in assurance delay associated with poor sustainability reporting readability are driven by accounting assurance providers. These results hold after controlling for endogeneity using Heckman's (1979) analysis and other measures of assurance delay readability used in prior literature. By checking the specialization of assurance provider partners and setting aside dominant countries, the authors provide insight into the impact of assurance provider specialization on the association between sustainability report readability and assurance provider effort measured by assurance delay and thus, lending further confidence to the strength of the study’s main findings.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides preliminary evidence on the relationship between sustainability reporting readability and assurance delay as well as the influence of accounting assurance providers.Practical implicationsSustainability assurance practice is viewed as a tool to add or enhance credibility. This study could be considered as another step into driving the standardization of sustainability reporting practice internationally.Originality/valueThis is the first investigation conducted in the sustainability literature on the assurance provider's response to the readability of sustainability reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Review of Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Review of Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-08-2022-0202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Review of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-08-2022-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本文旨在研究可持续性报告的可读性与担保提供者的努力之间的关系,通过担保延迟和担保提供者的调节效应来捕捉这种关系。设计/方法/方法该样本由来自39个国家的可持续性敏感行业的公司组成,涵盖2016年至2018年。结果表明,可持续性报告可读性差与更长的保证延迟有关。事实上,当可持续性报告可读性较差时,担保提供商会花更多的精力向客户提供担保,如长期担保延迟所示。此外,与可持续性报告可读性差相关的担保延迟增加是由会计担保提供商推动的。在使用Heckman(1979)的分析和先前文献中使用的其他保证延迟可读性的措施控制内生性之后,这些结果成立。通过检查担保提供者合作伙伴的专业化并将占主导地位的国家排除在外,作者深入了解了担保提供者专业化对可持续性报告可读性和以担保延迟衡量的担保提供者努力之间的关联的影响,从而为研究的主要发现提供了进一步的信心。研究局限性/含义本研究为可持续性报告可读性与保证延迟之间的关系以及会计保证提供者的影响提供了初步证据。实际含义可持续性保证实践被视为增加或提高可信度的工具。这项研究可被视为推动国际可持续性报告实践标准化的又一步。原创性/价值这是可持续性文献中首次对担保提供者对可持续性报告可读性的反应进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the rhetoric art in sustainability reports obstruct the assurance practice?
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between the readability of sustainability reports and assurance provider effort, captured by assurance delay and the moderating effect of the assurance provider.Design/methodology/approachThis sample consists of companies operating in sustainability sensitive industries from 39 countries for the period that covers the years 2016–2018.FindingsThe results show that poor sustainability reporting readability is associated with longer assurance delays. Indeed, assurance providers spend more effort assuring clients when sustainability reports are less readable, as shown by long assurance delay. In addition, increases in assurance delay associated with poor sustainability reporting readability are driven by accounting assurance providers. These results hold after controlling for endogeneity using Heckman's (1979) analysis and other measures of assurance delay readability used in prior literature. By checking the specialization of assurance provider partners and setting aside dominant countries, the authors provide insight into the impact of assurance provider specialization on the association between sustainability report readability and assurance provider effort measured by assurance delay and thus, lending further confidence to the strength of the study’s main findings.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides preliminary evidence on the relationship between sustainability reporting readability and assurance delay as well as the influence of accounting assurance providers.Practical implicationsSustainability assurance practice is viewed as a tool to add or enhance credibility. This study could be considered as another step into driving the standardization of sustainability reporting practice internationally.Originality/valueThis is the first investigation conducted in the sustainability literature on the assurance provider's response to the readability of sustainability reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Review of Accounting
Asian Review of Accounting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Covering various fields of accounting, Asian Review of Accounting publishes research papers, commentary notes, review papers and practitioner oriented articles that address significant international issues as well as those that focus on Asia Pacific in particular.Coverage includes but is not limited to: -Financial accounting -Managerial accounting -Auditing -Taxation -Accounting information systems -Social and environmental accounting -Accounting education Perspectives or viewpoints arising from regional, national or international focus, a private or public sector information need, or a market-perspective or social and environmental perspective are greatly welcomed. Manuscripts that present viewpoints should address issues of wide interest among accounting scholars internationally and those in Asia Pacific in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信