写作的不稳定性:新自由主义与全球化的大西洋

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
N. Islam
{"title":"写作的不稳定性:新自由主义与全球化的大西洋","authors":"N. Islam","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.1.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"62 1","pages":"130 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic\",\"authors\":\"N. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/cl.62.1.130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also\",\"PeriodicalId\":44998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《南大西洋季刊》2019年的一期题为“新自由主义的威权主义(再)转向”的文章中,编辑Jamie Peck和Nik Theodore质疑新自由主义一词是否有助于描述我们当代的一个时刻,其标志是“一系列低俗的威权(再)自2008年全球金融危机以来的十年里,世界各地都发生了转折——从特朗普到土耳其,从英国脱欧到巴西政变,以及其他许多事情。”1这只是当代对新自由主义思想持怀疑态度的一个例子,尤其是它的含义,它如何在全球背景下以不同的方式被用作一种思想和实践,以及它无法充分解释什么过程。然而,尽管学者们承认新自由主义的含义并不总是显而易见的,但他们仍然致力于理解它对文化领域的影响。这一领域的文学学术试图证明新自由主义不仅影响文学形式和表现,而且影响方法和流派的转变,如现实主义的复兴和回忆录的崛起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic
n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. CL published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; we also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J.M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, CL features the full diversity of critical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信