{"title":"写作的不稳定性:新自由主义与全球化的大西洋","authors":"N. Islam","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.1.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"62 1","pages":"130 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic\",\"authors\":\"N. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/cl.62.1.130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also\",\"PeriodicalId\":44998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic
n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. CL published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; we also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J.M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, CL features the full diversity of critical practices.