对杰森·比文斯《日常十字军东征:美国政治中的基督教民族主义》评论的回应

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Allyson F. Shortle, Irfan Nooruddin, Eric L. McDaniel
{"title":"对杰森·比文斯《日常十字军东征:美国政治中的基督教民族主义》评论的回应","authors":"Allyson F. Shortle, Irfan Nooruddin, Eric L. McDaniel","doi":"10.1017/S1537592723001962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"energies of the John Birch Society were marginalized to our moment, when a loose populism has brought such energies into the mainstream (pp. 168–74). Importantly, they establish that those attracted to this shift are less inclined to actual political engagement, preferring symbolic victories over substantive policy (p. 183). The concluding chapter on race generates some unexpected nuance beyond the boilerplate observation that religious hubris is overwhelmingly white in America. They note that a variety of patriotic attitudes are present among racial minorities—for example, culturally conservative African American disciples can support liberal policies—that those in the “back of the pews”must nonetheless contend with a broader Christian nationalist sense of urgency, and that a religious legacy must be defended under duress (p. 215). The contributions of The Everyday Crusade are considerable, both to a range of academic literatures and to general readers going forward. That said, from my perspective as a scholar of religion I would raise several questions as I think along with the authors. Broadly speaking, their rigor in documenting a range of attitudes leaves me with questions about the story behind these attitudes. Although their historicization is welcome, my own concerns as a scholar and citizen have to do with the how and the where of such attitudes; for example, I would ask which media, which persons of influence, and which institutional forces are cultivating and manipulating such attitudes. I also had questions throughout about whether religion, in all its complexity, can be properly understood as simply attitudinal. I was often left unsatisfied with descriptions of religious beliefs as “value systems” (145) or as imbuing believers with a sense of purpose. To me, this is more than a quibble because the communal, ritual, and disciplinary aspects of religion seem so central to the public, confrontational face of Christian nationalism. Acknowledging the importance of religion to participants in these surveys did not always adequately capture the reasons for the weaponization of religious attitudes. I was also struck by an occasional elision of American religious exceptionalism and Christian nationalism. These phenomena are, of course, closely interwoven, historically and at present; and it is one of the authors’ main claims that the latter represents a sharpening of the former (p. 28). However, the gravity of the phenomenon Americans currently face—with its disinformation, its regular contempt for democratic procedure, its militant whiteness — represents something quite distinct from dreamings of a New Israel or a conviction that the United States is the indispensable nation. These questions in my judgment do not diminish the many accomplishments of this fine book. Indeed, the authors are to be commended for providing a broad contextual account of a category so often lazily circulated among journalists. What is more, The Everyday Crusade is not shy about its own political convictions, making its contributions even more important in these fractious times.","PeriodicalId":48097,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Politics","volume":"21 1","pages":"1066 - 1067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Jason C. Bivins’s Review of The Everyday Crusade: Christian Nationalism in American Politics\",\"authors\":\"Allyson F. Shortle, Irfan Nooruddin, Eric L. McDaniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1537592723001962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"energies of the John Birch Society were marginalized to our moment, when a loose populism has brought such energies into the mainstream (pp. 168–74). Importantly, they establish that those attracted to this shift are less inclined to actual political engagement, preferring symbolic victories over substantive policy (p. 183). The concluding chapter on race generates some unexpected nuance beyond the boilerplate observation that religious hubris is overwhelmingly white in America. They note that a variety of patriotic attitudes are present among racial minorities—for example, culturally conservative African American disciples can support liberal policies—that those in the “back of the pews”must nonetheless contend with a broader Christian nationalist sense of urgency, and that a religious legacy must be defended under duress (p. 215). The contributions of The Everyday Crusade are considerable, both to a range of academic literatures and to general readers going forward. That said, from my perspective as a scholar of religion I would raise several questions as I think along with the authors. Broadly speaking, their rigor in documenting a range of attitudes leaves me with questions about the story behind these attitudes. Although their historicization is welcome, my own concerns as a scholar and citizen have to do with the how and the where of such attitudes; for example, I would ask which media, which persons of influence, and which institutional forces are cultivating and manipulating such attitudes. I also had questions throughout about whether religion, in all its complexity, can be properly understood as simply attitudinal. I was often left unsatisfied with descriptions of religious beliefs as “value systems” (145) or as imbuing believers with a sense of purpose. To me, this is more than a quibble because the communal, ritual, and disciplinary aspects of religion seem so central to the public, confrontational face of Christian nationalism. Acknowledging the importance of religion to participants in these surveys did not always adequately capture the reasons for the weaponization of religious attitudes. I was also struck by an occasional elision of American religious exceptionalism and Christian nationalism. These phenomena are, of course, closely interwoven, historically and at present; and it is one of the authors’ main claims that the latter represents a sharpening of the former (p. 28). However, the gravity of the phenomenon Americans currently face—with its disinformation, its regular contempt for democratic procedure, its militant whiteness — represents something quite distinct from dreamings of a New Israel or a conviction that the United States is the indispensable nation. These questions in my judgment do not diminish the many accomplishments of this fine book. Indeed, the authors are to be commended for providing a broad contextual account of a category so often lazily circulated among journalists. What is more, The Everyday Crusade is not shy about its own political convictions, making its contributions even more important in these fractious times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Politics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1066 - 1067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592723001962\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592723001962","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰·伯奇协会的能量一直被边缘化到我们的时代,当时松散的民粹主义将这种能量带入了主流(第168-74页)。重要的是,他们确定,那些被这种转变吸引的人不太倾向于实际的政治参与,更喜欢象征性的胜利,而不是实质性的政策(第183页)。关于种族的最后一章产生了一些意想不到的细微差别,超出了对宗教傲慢在美国绝大多数是白人的样板观察。他们指出,少数种族中存在着各种爱国态度——例如,文化保守的非裔美国人门徒可以支持自由主义政策——尽管如此,那些坐在“长椅后面”的人必须与更广泛的基督教民族主义紧迫感作斗争,宗教遗产必须在胁迫下得到捍卫(第215页)。《每日十字军东征》对一系列学术文献和广大读者的贡献都是巨大的。也就是说,从我作为一名宗教学者的角度来看,我会和作者一起提出几个问题。总的来说,他们在记录一系列态度方面的严谨让我对这些态度背后的故事产生了疑问。尽管他们的历史化是受欢迎的,但作为一名学者和公民,我自己关心的是这种态度的方式和地点;例如,我想问哪些媒体、哪些有影响力的人以及哪些制度力量正在培养和操纵这种态度。我自始至终也有疑问,宗教的复杂性是否可以被恰当地理解为简单的态度。我经常对将宗教信仰描述为“价值体系”(145)或向信徒灌输目标感感到不满。对我来说,这不仅仅是一个狡辩,因为宗教的公共、仪式和纪律方面似乎是基督教民族主义公众对抗的核心。在这些调查中,承认宗教对参与者的重要性并不总能充分说明宗教态度武器化的原因。我还被偶尔省略的美国宗教例外论和基督教民族主义所打动。当然,这些现象在历史上和现在都是紧密交织在一起的;作者的主要主张之一是,后者代表了前者的锐化(第28页)。然而,美国人目前面临的现象的严重性——虚假信息、对民主程序的经常蔑视、激进的白人——与新以色列的梦想或美国是不可或缺的国家的信念截然不同。在我看来,这些问题并没有削弱这本优秀著作的许多成就。事实上,作者对一个经常在记者中懒散传播的类别提供了广泛的背景描述,这是值得赞扬的。更重要的是,《每日十字军东征》并不回避自己的政治信念,在这个动荡的时代,它的贡献变得更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Jason C. Bivins’s Review of The Everyday Crusade: Christian Nationalism in American Politics
energies of the John Birch Society were marginalized to our moment, when a loose populism has brought such energies into the mainstream (pp. 168–74). Importantly, they establish that those attracted to this shift are less inclined to actual political engagement, preferring symbolic victories over substantive policy (p. 183). The concluding chapter on race generates some unexpected nuance beyond the boilerplate observation that religious hubris is overwhelmingly white in America. They note that a variety of patriotic attitudes are present among racial minorities—for example, culturally conservative African American disciples can support liberal policies—that those in the “back of the pews”must nonetheless contend with a broader Christian nationalist sense of urgency, and that a religious legacy must be defended under duress (p. 215). The contributions of The Everyday Crusade are considerable, both to a range of academic literatures and to general readers going forward. That said, from my perspective as a scholar of religion I would raise several questions as I think along with the authors. Broadly speaking, their rigor in documenting a range of attitudes leaves me with questions about the story behind these attitudes. Although their historicization is welcome, my own concerns as a scholar and citizen have to do with the how and the where of such attitudes; for example, I would ask which media, which persons of influence, and which institutional forces are cultivating and manipulating such attitudes. I also had questions throughout about whether religion, in all its complexity, can be properly understood as simply attitudinal. I was often left unsatisfied with descriptions of religious beliefs as “value systems” (145) or as imbuing believers with a sense of purpose. To me, this is more than a quibble because the communal, ritual, and disciplinary aspects of religion seem so central to the public, confrontational face of Christian nationalism. Acknowledging the importance of religion to participants in these surveys did not always adequately capture the reasons for the weaponization of religious attitudes. I was also struck by an occasional elision of American religious exceptionalism and Christian nationalism. These phenomena are, of course, closely interwoven, historically and at present; and it is one of the authors’ main claims that the latter represents a sharpening of the former (p. 28). However, the gravity of the phenomenon Americans currently face—with its disinformation, its regular contempt for democratic procedure, its militant whiteness — represents something quite distinct from dreamings of a New Israel or a conviction that the United States is the indispensable nation. These questions in my judgment do not diminish the many accomplishments of this fine book. Indeed, the authors are to be commended for providing a broad contextual account of a category so often lazily circulated among journalists. What is more, The Everyday Crusade is not shy about its own political convictions, making its contributions even more important in these fractious times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Politics
Perspectives on Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
313
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Politics is a journal of broad interest to scholars across many fields, in addition to professional political scientists, political analysts, policy makers, and the informed public. Essays synthesize and extend significant research and developments in all dimensions of political science scholarship. In many cases, the journal aims to connect research findings, conceptual innovations, or theoretical developments to real problems of politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信