新历史与建筑白话:对话

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Maria Letícia Silva Ticle, M. Rezende
{"title":"新历史与建筑白话:对话","authors":"Maria Letícia Silva Ticle, M. Rezende","doi":"10.4013/ARQ.2018.142.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with two areas of academic and, above all, human knowledge – History and Architecture. It is an initial proposal of a comparison? between New History and Vernacular Architecture, movements which have been affirming themselves in their respective fields of knowledge since approximately the decade of 1970. The broadening of the perspective of analysis and their conceptual approaches are addressed through the objects that they deal with: the everyday, the average citizen’s life. This is a proposal of complementarity based on their appropriation of each other. Although admittedly interdisciplinary, they may still seem distant to many researchers and scholars. The paper uses as theoretical and conceptual basis works by different authors, but its central analysis is based on works by Peter Burke and Thomas Carter and Elizabeth Cromley, from History and Architecture, respectively. Keywords: New History, Vernacular Architecture, interdisciplinarity.","PeriodicalId":41593,"journal":{"name":"Arquitetura Revista","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nova História e Arquitetura Vernácula: diálogos\",\"authors\":\"Maria Letícia Silva Ticle, M. Rezende\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/ARQ.2018.142.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with two areas of academic and, above all, human knowledge – History and Architecture. It is an initial proposal of a comparison? between New History and Vernacular Architecture, movements which have been affirming themselves in their respective fields of knowledge since approximately the decade of 1970. The broadening of the perspective of analysis and their conceptual approaches are addressed through the objects that they deal with: the everyday, the average citizen’s life. This is a proposal of complementarity based on their appropriation of each other. Although admittedly interdisciplinary, they may still seem distant to many researchers and scholars. The paper uses as theoretical and conceptual basis works by different authors, but its central analysis is based on works by Peter Burke and Thomas Carter and Elizabeth Cromley, from History and Architecture, respectively. Keywords: New History, Vernacular Architecture, interdisciplinarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquitetura Revista\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquitetura Revista\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/ARQ.2018.142.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquitetura Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/ARQ.2018.142.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文涉及两个领域的学术知识,最重要的是人类知识——历史和建筑。这是一个初步的比较建议?在新历史和乡土建筑之间,这些运动自1970年以来一直在各自的知识领域中自我肯定。分析视角的拓宽及其概念方法是通过它们所处理的对象来解决的:日常、普通公民的生活。这是一项基于相互分配的互补性建议。尽管公认它们是跨学科的,但对许多研究人员和学者来说,它们可能仍然遥不可及。本文使用了不同作者的作品作为理论和概念基础,但其核心分析是基于彼得·伯克、托马斯·卡特和伊丽莎白·克罗姆利分别来自《历史》和《建筑》的作品。关键词:新史,乡土建筑,跨学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nova História e Arquitetura Vernácula: diálogos
This paper deals with two areas of academic and, above all, human knowledge – History and Architecture. It is an initial proposal of a comparison? between New History and Vernacular Architecture, movements which have been affirming themselves in their respective fields of knowledge since approximately the decade of 1970. The broadening of the perspective of analysis and their conceptual approaches are addressed through the objects that they deal with: the everyday, the average citizen’s life. This is a proposal of complementarity based on their appropriation of each other. Although admittedly interdisciplinary, they may still seem distant to many researchers and scholars. The paper uses as theoretical and conceptual basis works by different authors, but its central analysis is based on works by Peter Burke and Thomas Carter and Elizabeth Cromley, from History and Architecture, respectively. Keywords: New History, Vernacular Architecture, interdisciplinarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquitetura Revista
Arquitetura Revista ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信