2022年美国州一级众议院选举预测模型:选区划分不当的潜在影响建模

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Polity Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1086/725244
Jay A. DeSart
{"title":"2022年美国州一级众议院选举预测模型:选区划分不当的潜在影响建模","authors":"Jay A. DeSart","doi":"10.1086/725244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This model was developed specifically for the Midterm Election Forecasting Roundtable at the 2022 APSA Annual Meeting in Montréal. While most House forecast models generate forecasts either at the district level, or the aggregate number of seats won by a party, this model is different. It models the number of House seats in each state won by the Democrats and generates a forecast at the end of August. With 2022 being the first post-redistricting election of the decade, the main motivation behind this model was to attempt to capture the potential impact that gerrymandering would have on state-level outcomes. Gerrymandering is most likely to occur in a state under two conditions: (1) when reapportionment leads to a change in the number of seats apportioned to the state, and (2) when the state’s redistricting process is entirely controlled by one political party. Given that, this model includes a simple dummy variable for Gerrymander Potential, which is simply 1 if both of those conditions exist in a state in the first post-redistricting election of each decade. It is also party adjusted, taking on a negative value if the state’s redistricting process is controlled by Republicans, and positive if it is controlled by Democrats. If a state’s redistricting process was subject to divided party control, handled by an independent redistricting commission, or where the maps were drawn by state courts, I assigned this variable a value of 0.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A State-Level U.S. House Election Forecast Model for 2022: Modeling the Potential Effects of Gerrymandering\",\"authors\":\"Jay A. DeSart\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This model was developed specifically for the Midterm Election Forecasting Roundtable at the 2022 APSA Annual Meeting in Montréal. While most House forecast models generate forecasts either at the district level, or the aggregate number of seats won by a party, this model is different. It models the number of House seats in each state won by the Democrats and generates a forecast at the end of August. With 2022 being the first post-redistricting election of the decade, the main motivation behind this model was to attempt to capture the potential impact that gerrymandering would have on state-level outcomes. Gerrymandering is most likely to occur in a state under two conditions: (1) when reapportionment leads to a change in the number of seats apportioned to the state, and (2) when the state’s redistricting process is entirely controlled by one political party. Given that, this model includes a simple dummy variable for Gerrymander Potential, which is simply 1 if both of those conditions exist in a state in the first post-redistricting election of each decade. It is also party adjusted, taking on a negative value if the state’s redistricting process is controlled by Republicans, and positive if it is controlled by Democrats. If a state’s redistricting process was subject to divided party control, handled by an independent redistricting commission, or where the maps were drawn by state courts, I assigned this variable a value of 0.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

该模型是专门为蒙特利尔2022年APSA年会中期选举预测圆桌会议开发的。虽然大多数众议院预测模型都是在地区层面或政党赢得的席位总数上生成预测,但这种模型不同。它模拟了民主党在每个州赢得的众议院席位数量,并在8月底做出预测。2022年是十年来第一次重新划分选区后的选举,这种模式背后的主要动机是试图捕捉选区划分不公对州级选举结果的潜在影响。在两种情况下,选区划分不公最有可能发生在一个州:(1)当重新分配导致分配给该州的席位数量发生变化时,以及(2)当该州的选区重新划分过程完全由一个政党控制时。考虑到这一点,该模型包括一个Gerrymander Potential的简单虚拟变量,如果在每十年的第一次选区重新划分后的选举中,一个州都存在这两种情况,则该变量仅为1。它也经过党派调整,如果该州的选区重新划分过程由共和党人控制,它将为负值,如果由民主党人控制,则为正值。如果一个州的重新划分过程受到党派控制,由独立的重新划分委员会处理,或者地图由州法院绘制,我给这个变量赋值为0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A State-Level U.S. House Election Forecast Model for 2022: Modeling the Potential Effects of Gerrymandering
This model was developed specifically for the Midterm Election Forecasting Roundtable at the 2022 APSA Annual Meeting in Montréal. While most House forecast models generate forecasts either at the district level, or the aggregate number of seats won by a party, this model is different. It models the number of House seats in each state won by the Democrats and generates a forecast at the end of August. With 2022 being the first post-redistricting election of the decade, the main motivation behind this model was to attempt to capture the potential impact that gerrymandering would have on state-level outcomes. Gerrymandering is most likely to occur in a state under two conditions: (1) when reapportionment leads to a change in the number of seats apportioned to the state, and (2) when the state’s redistricting process is entirely controlled by one political party. Given that, this model includes a simple dummy variable for Gerrymander Potential, which is simply 1 if both of those conditions exist in a state in the first post-redistricting election of each decade. It is also party adjusted, taking on a negative value if the state’s redistricting process is controlled by Republicans, and positive if it is controlled by Democrats. If a state’s redistricting process was subject to divided party control, handled by an independent redistricting commission, or where the maps were drawn by state courts, I assigned this variable a value of 0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信