{"title":"国际人权法承认紧急医疗服务为人权面临的挑战","authors":"J. Uusitalo","doi":"10.37173/cirr.26.87.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The\nEmergency Medical Services (EMS) are emergency services generally been designed\nto provide urgent treatment of patients with life-threatening conditions\noutside medical facilities. Even though the EMS belongs to the category of\nsocio-economic rights, it nevertheless has great significance in safeguarding\none of the most fundamental human rights, the right to life. In fact,\ninternational humanitarian law has recognised this important connection by establishing\nexplicit legal rules that oblige states to ensure urgent medical care for the wounded\nand sick. International human rights law, on the other hand, has no such expressed\nprovisions. However, the problem is not the lack of legal rules applicable to\nthe EMS as such but rather the challenges in human rights perception, which\nhinder the EMS being perceived as a valuable human right. Therefore, this\narticle essentially argues that international human rights law does not\nrecognise the EMS as a human right sufficiently and that more thorough actions\nare required from the UN Committee of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights\n(CESCR) in this regard.","PeriodicalId":35243,"journal":{"name":"Croatian International Relations Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Challenges to the Emergency Medical Services to be Recognised as a Human Right in International Human Rights Law\",\"authors\":\"J. Uusitalo\",\"doi\":\"10.37173/cirr.26.87.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The\\nEmergency Medical Services (EMS) are emergency services generally been designed\\nto provide urgent treatment of patients with life-threatening conditions\\noutside medical facilities. Even though the EMS belongs to the category of\\nsocio-economic rights, it nevertheless has great significance in safeguarding\\none of the most fundamental human rights, the right to life. In fact,\\ninternational humanitarian law has recognised this important connection by establishing\\nexplicit legal rules that oblige states to ensure urgent medical care for the wounded\\nand sick. International human rights law, on the other hand, has no such expressed\\nprovisions. However, the problem is not the lack of legal rules applicable to\\nthe EMS as such but rather the challenges in human rights perception, which\\nhinder the EMS being perceived as a valuable human right. Therefore, this\\narticle essentially argues that international human rights law does not\\nrecognise the EMS as a human right sufficiently and that more thorough actions\\nare required from the UN Committee of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights\\n(CESCR) in this regard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian International Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.87.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Challenges to the Emergency Medical Services to be Recognised as a Human Right in International Human Rights Law
The
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are emergency services generally been designed
to provide urgent treatment of patients with life-threatening conditions
outside medical facilities. Even though the EMS belongs to the category of
socio-economic rights, it nevertheless has great significance in safeguarding
one of the most fundamental human rights, the right to life. In fact,
international humanitarian law has recognised this important connection by establishing
explicit legal rules that oblige states to ensure urgent medical care for the wounded
and sick. International human rights law, on the other hand, has no such expressed
provisions. However, the problem is not the lack of legal rules applicable to
the EMS as such but rather the challenges in human rights perception, which
hinder the EMS being perceived as a valuable human right. Therefore, this
article essentially argues that international human rights law does not
recognise the EMS as a human right sufficiently and that more thorough actions
are required from the UN Committee of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(CESCR) in this regard.
期刊介绍:
The Croatian International Relations Review (CIRR) is an interdisciplinary academic journal published in English since 1995 and focuses on political science, sociology, law and economics. Each issue includes scholarly, double-blind peer reviewed articles, and book reviews. CIRR is a member of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics – and is published electronically by the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) in Zagreb. The journal is supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia and is published in collaboration with De Gruyter Open, the world’s second largest publisher of Open Access academic content. CIRR is indexed by 40 scholarly databases, including ESCI, Scopus, Erih Plus, EconLit and Proquest Social Science Premium Collection. Articles reflect the views of their authors only.