艺术教师培训的差距：巴西教育中的旧挑战和问题

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Arts Education Policy Review Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI:10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830

Gustavo Cunha de Araújo, Irany Ferreira Lima

{"title":"艺术教师培训的差距：巴西教育中的旧挑战和问题","authors":"Gustavo Cunha de Araújo, Irany Ferreira Lima","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study’s main objective is to problematize the work of a school in the teaching of arts, using the context of Brazilian artistic education. The qualitative, descriptive, documentative, and bibliographical research can be characterized as a case study. Given the known value of the arts in students’ overall education, we propose formative actions designed to prepare professionals in the field to teach the arts, although we recognize that actions exclusively aimed at professional training do not guarantee institutional support of art classes. Finally, we consider the urgent need to formulate public policies that enable the implementation of didactic actions and financial investments in teacher training, which may offer more suitable teaching opportunities and provide quality teaching.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in the training of arts teachers: old challenges and problems in Brazilian education\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Cunha de Araújo, Irany Ferreira Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study’s main objective is to problematize the work of a school in the teaching of arts, using the context of Brazilian artistic education. The qualitative, descriptive, documentative, and bibliographical research can be characterized as a case study. Given the known value of the arts in students’ overall education, we propose formative actions designed to prepare professionals in the field to teach the arts, although we recognize that actions exclusively aimed at professional training do not guarantee institutional support of art classes. Finally, we consider the urgent need to formulate public policies that enable the implementation of didactic actions and financial investments in teacher training, which may offer more suitable teaching opportunities and provide quality teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的主要目的是利用巴西艺术教育的背景，对一所学校在艺术教学中的工作提出问题。定性的、描述性的、文献性的和文献学的研究可以被描述为一个案例研究。鉴于艺术在学生整体教育中的已知价值，我们提出了旨在培养该领域专业人士教授艺术的形成性行动，尽管我们认识到，专门针对专业培训的行动并不能保证艺术课程得到机构支持。最后，我们认为迫切需要制定公共政策，以便在教师培训方面实施教学行动和财政投资，从而提供更合适的教学机会，提供高质量的教学。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Gaps in the training of arts teachers: old challenges and problems in Brazilian education

Abstract This study’s main objective is to problematize the work of a school in the teaching of arts, using the context of Brazilian artistic education. The qualitative, descriptive, documentative, and bibliographical research can be characterized as a case study. Given the known value of the arts in students’ overall education, we propose formative actions designed to prepare professionals in the field to teach the arts, although we recognize that actions exclusively aimed at professional training do not guarantee institutional support of art classes. Finally, we consider the urgent need to formulate public policies that enable the implementation of didactic actions and financial investments in teacher training, which may offer more suitable teaching opportunities and provide quality teaching.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.