机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后神经血管束分离和尿失禁恢复的手术技术评估

JU open plus Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1097/ju9.0000000000000035
Runzhuo Ma, Steven Cen, Edward Forsyth, Patrick Probst, Aeen Asghar, William Townsend, Alvin Hui, Aditya Desai, Michael Tzeng, Emily Cheng, Ashwin Ramaswamy, Christian Wagner, Jim C Hu, Andrew J Hung
{"title":"机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后神经血管束分离和尿失禁恢复的手术技术评估","authors":"Runzhuo Ma, Steven Cen, Edward Forsyth, Patrick Probst, Aeen Asghar, William Townsend, Alvin Hui, Aditya Desai, Michael Tzeng, Emily Cheng, Ashwin Ramaswamy, Christian Wagner, Jim C Hu, Andrew J Hung","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the association between the <i>quality</i> of neurovascular bundle dissection and urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RARPs from 2016 to 2018 in two institutions with ≥1-year postoperative follow-up were included. The primary outcomes were time to urinary continence recovery. Surgical videos were independently assessed by 3 blinded raters using the validated <i>Dissection Assessment for Robotic Technique (DART)</i> tool after standardized training. Cox regression was used to test the association between DART scores and urinary continence recovery while adjusting for relevant patient features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>121 RARP performed by 23 surgeons with various experience levels were included. The median follow-up was 24 months (95% CI 20 - 28 months). The median time to continence recovery was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7 - 9.8 months). After adjusting for patient age, higher scores of certain DART domains, specifically <i>tissue retraction</i> and <i>efficiency</i>, were significantly associated with increased odds of continence recovery (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technical skill scores of neurovascular bundle dissection vary among surgeons and correlate with urinary continence recovery. Unveiling the specific robotic dissection skillsets which impact patient outcomes has the potential to focus surgical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical surgical skill assessment of neurovascular bundle dissection and urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Runzhuo Ma, Steven Cen, Edward Forsyth, Patrick Probst, Aeen Asghar, William Townsend, Alvin Hui, Aditya Desai, Michael Tzeng, Emily Cheng, Ashwin Ramaswamy, Christian Wagner, Jim C Hu, Andrew J Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the association between the <i>quality</i> of neurovascular bundle dissection and urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RARPs from 2016 to 2018 in two institutions with ≥1-year postoperative follow-up were included. The primary outcomes were time to urinary continence recovery. Surgical videos were independently assessed by 3 blinded raters using the validated <i>Dissection Assessment for Robotic Technique (DART)</i> tool after standardized training. Cox regression was used to test the association between DART scores and urinary continence recovery while adjusting for relevant patient features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>121 RARP performed by 23 surgeons with various experience levels were included. The median follow-up was 24 months (95% CI 20 - 28 months). The median time to continence recovery was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7 - 9.8 months). After adjusting for patient age, higher scores of certain DART domains, specifically <i>tissue retraction</i> and <i>efficiency</i>, were significantly associated with increased odds of continence recovery (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technical skill scores of neurovascular bundle dissection vary among surgeons and correlate with urinary continence recovery. Unveiling the specific robotic dissection skillsets which impact patient outcomes has the potential to focus surgical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究机器人辅助前列腺根治术后神经血管束剥离质量与尿失禁恢复之间的关系。纳入2016年至2018年在2家机构接受RARP且术后随访≥1年的患者。主要结果是尿失禁恢复的时间。手术视频由3名盲法评分者在标准化培训后使用经验证的机器人技术解剖评估(DART)工具进行独立评估。Cox回归用于检验DART评分与尿失禁恢复之间的相关性,同时对相关患者特征进行调整。包括23名具有不同经验水平的外科医生进行的一百二十一次RARP。中位随访时间为24个月(95%置信区间[CI]20-28个月)。失禁恢复的中位时间为7.3个月(95%CI 4.7-9.8个月)。在根据患者年龄进行调整后,某些DART领域的得分较高,特别是组织回缩和效率较高,与失禁恢复的几率增加显著相关(P<.05)。神经血管束剥离的技术技能得分因外科医生而异,并与尿失禁恢复相关。揭示影响患者预后的特定机器人解剖技能有可能集中进行外科培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical surgical skill assessment of neurovascular bundle dissection and urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Purpose: To examine the association between the quality of neurovascular bundle dissection and urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent RARPs from 2016 to 2018 in two institutions with ≥1-year postoperative follow-up were included. The primary outcomes were time to urinary continence recovery. Surgical videos were independently assessed by 3 blinded raters using the validated Dissection Assessment for Robotic Technique (DART) tool after standardized training. Cox regression was used to test the association between DART scores and urinary continence recovery while adjusting for relevant patient features.

Results: 121 RARP performed by 23 surgeons with various experience levels were included. The median follow-up was 24 months (95% CI 20 - 28 months). The median time to continence recovery was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7 - 9.8 months). After adjusting for patient age, higher scores of certain DART domains, specifically tissue retraction and efficiency, were significantly associated with increased odds of continence recovery (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Technical skill scores of neurovascular bundle dissection vary among surgeons and correlate with urinary continence recovery. Unveiling the specific robotic dissection skillsets which impact patient outcomes has the potential to focus surgical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信