企业社会责任:制度主义波兰学派分析

IF 4.6 Q2 BUSINESS
Nicolas Postel, R. Sobel
{"title":"企业社会责任:制度主义波兰学派分析","authors":"Nicolas Postel, R. Sobel","doi":"10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to focus on the understanding corporate social responsibility (CSR), this “novel” form of corporate engagement, and evaluating its capacity to regulate capitalism. The authors advance the following thesis: CSR constitutes a new variety of regulation of capitalism which, to work efficiently, must be built on collective institutions (through both collective agreements and forms of coercion), instead of strictly contractual forms (based on inter-individual relations and voluntary commitments).,To support this thesis, the authors use Karl Polanyi’s theory, in particular his concept of “fictitious commodities”. Like Polanyi, we contend that CSR is a necessary reaction to the new “great transformation” brought about by the financialisation of our economy which is currently in crisis. Polanyi agrees that this kind of regulation can yield results only when based on collective institutions. In the last section of the study, the authors attempt to determine how a “conventionalist analysis” of CSR could help us to precisely describe this phenomenon and how it could be institutionalised by actors (both inside and outside companies).,This paper theoretically demonstrates the role of institutions in CSR processes and the need to weigh them theoretically. In this sense, the paper demonstrates the aporia of a strictly contractualist framework, not only for the understanding of the phenomenon, but for its deployment.,This study proposes a theoretical framework, which is yet to be consolidated by empirical research.,The paper proposes salient elements of a public policy of responsibility.,The paper proposes a methodological framework to go beyond a bilateral representation of the institutional framework and to produce a collective representation of the negotiation.,This is an original paper in its theoretical positioning and the implications it suggests for economic policy.","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"381-400"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate social responsibility (CSR): an institutionalist Polanyian analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Postel, R. Sobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to focus on the understanding corporate social responsibility (CSR), this “novel” form of corporate engagement, and evaluating its capacity to regulate capitalism. The authors advance the following thesis: CSR constitutes a new variety of regulation of capitalism which, to work efficiently, must be built on collective institutions (through both collective agreements and forms of coercion), instead of strictly contractual forms (based on inter-individual relations and voluntary commitments).,To support this thesis, the authors use Karl Polanyi’s theory, in particular his concept of “fictitious commodities”. Like Polanyi, we contend that CSR is a necessary reaction to the new “great transformation” brought about by the financialisation of our economy which is currently in crisis. Polanyi agrees that this kind of regulation can yield results only when based on collective institutions. In the last section of the study, the authors attempt to determine how a “conventionalist analysis” of CSR could help us to precisely describe this phenomenon and how it could be institutionalised by actors (both inside and outside companies).,This paper theoretically demonstrates the role of institutions in CSR processes and the need to weigh them theoretically. In this sense, the paper demonstrates the aporia of a strictly contractualist framework, not only for the understanding of the phenomenon, but for its deployment.,This study proposes a theoretical framework, which is yet to be consolidated by empirical research.,The paper proposes salient elements of a public policy of responsibility.,The paper proposes a methodological framework to go beyond a bilateral representation of the institutional framework and to produce a collective representation of the negotiation.,This is an original paper in its theoretical positioning and the implications it suggests for economic policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"381-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-07-2019-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在重点了解企业社会责任(CSR),这是一种“新颖”的企业参与形式,并评估其监管资本主义的能力。作者提出了以下论点:企业社会责任构成了资本主义的一种新的监管形式,为了有效运作,必须建立在集体制度之上(通过集体协议和胁迫形式),而不是严格的合同形式(基于个人间关系和自愿承诺)。,为了支持本文,作者运用了波兰尼的理论,特别是他的“虚拟商品”概念。和波兰尼一样,我们认为企业社会责任是对当前处于危机中的经济金融化带来的新的“伟大变革”的必要反应。波兰尼同意这种监管只有建立在集体制度的基础上才能产生效果。在研究的最后一部分,作者试图确定对企业社会责任的“传统主义分析”如何帮助我们准确描述这一现象,以及行为者(包括公司内部和外部)如何将其制度化。,本文从理论上论证了制度在企业社会责任过程中的作用,以及从理论上权衡它们的必要性。从这个意义上说,本文论证了严格契约主义框架的aporia,不仅是为了理解这种现象,也是为了部署它。,本研究提出了一个理论框架,该框架尚待实证研究巩固。,本文提出了公共责任政策的重要内容。,该文件提出了一个方法框架,以超越体制框架的双边代表性,并产生谈判的集体代表性。,这是一篇关于其理论定位及其对经济政策的启示的原创论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate social responsibility (CSR): an institutionalist Polanyian analysis
This study aims to focus on the understanding corporate social responsibility (CSR), this “novel” form of corporate engagement, and evaluating its capacity to regulate capitalism. The authors advance the following thesis: CSR constitutes a new variety of regulation of capitalism which, to work efficiently, must be built on collective institutions (through both collective agreements and forms of coercion), instead of strictly contractual forms (based on inter-individual relations and voluntary commitments).,To support this thesis, the authors use Karl Polanyi’s theory, in particular his concept of “fictitious commodities”. Like Polanyi, we contend that CSR is a necessary reaction to the new “great transformation” brought about by the financialisation of our economy which is currently in crisis. Polanyi agrees that this kind of regulation can yield results only when based on collective institutions. In the last section of the study, the authors attempt to determine how a “conventionalist analysis” of CSR could help us to precisely describe this phenomenon and how it could be institutionalised by actors (both inside and outside companies).,This paper theoretically demonstrates the role of institutions in CSR processes and the need to weigh them theoretically. In this sense, the paper demonstrates the aporia of a strictly contractualist framework, not only for the understanding of the phenomenon, but for its deployment.,This study proposes a theoretical framework, which is yet to be consolidated by empirical research.,The paper proposes salient elements of a public policy of responsibility.,The paper proposes a methodological framework to go beyond a bilateral representation of the institutional framework and to produce a collective representation of the negotiation.,This is an original paper in its theoretical positioning and the implications it suggests for economic policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信