{"title":"综合医院住院病人跌倒危险因素分析","authors":"Yeon Hwa Lee, M. Kim","doi":"10.7739/jkafn.2022.29.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the predictors of falls according to the fall risk level in general hospital inpatients.Methods: Data were extracted from electronic medical records from January 2017 to December 2019. This study included 170 fallers and 340 non-fallers, who were matched for gender, age, clinical department, and length of stay before falls among inpatients aged 18 years and over. The collected data were analyzed with the x2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t-test, and logistic regression analysis using SPSS for Windows version 24.0.Results: In the low-risk group, defecation disorder (odds ratio [OR]=12.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16~134.33, p=.037) and laxative use (OR=9.62, 95% CI=2.14~43.22, p=.003) were statistically significant risk factors for falls. In the medium-risk group, disorientation (OR=2.40, 95% CI=1.11~5.19, p=.026) was a statistically significant risk factor for falls. In the high-risk group, disorientation (OR=12.54, 95% CI=1.39~113.26, p=.024) and hypoglycemic agent use (OR=5.39, 95% CI=1.58~18.44, p=.007) were statistically significant risk factors for falls.Conclusion: The results of this study show that risk factors for falls differed among the fall risk groups. It is necessary to use fall prevention strategies tailored to fall risk groups and fall risk assessment tools that have been revised accordingly.","PeriodicalId":53419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors according to Fall Risk Level in General Hospital Inpatients\",\"authors\":\"Yeon Hwa Lee, M. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.7739/jkafn.2022.29.1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the predictors of falls according to the fall risk level in general hospital inpatients.Methods: Data were extracted from electronic medical records from January 2017 to December 2019. This study included 170 fallers and 340 non-fallers, who were matched for gender, age, clinical department, and length of stay before falls among inpatients aged 18 years and over. The collected data were analyzed with the x2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t-test, and logistic regression analysis using SPSS for Windows version 24.0.Results: In the low-risk group, defecation disorder (odds ratio [OR]=12.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16~134.33, p=.037) and laxative use (OR=9.62, 95% CI=2.14~43.22, p=.003) were statistically significant risk factors for falls. In the medium-risk group, disorientation (OR=2.40, 95% CI=1.11~5.19, p=.026) was a statistically significant risk factor for falls. In the high-risk group, disorientation (OR=12.54, 95% CI=1.39~113.26, p=.024) and hypoglycemic agent use (OR=5.39, 95% CI=1.58~18.44, p=.007) were statistically significant risk factors for falls.Conclusion: The results of this study show that risk factors for falls differed among the fall risk groups. It is necessary to use fall prevention strategies tailored to fall risk groups and fall risk assessment tools that have been revised accordingly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2022.29.1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2022.29.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:本研究旨在根据综合医院住院患者的跌倒风险水平来确定跌倒的预测因素。方法:从2017年1月至2019年12月的电子病历中提取数据。这项研究包括170名跌倒者和340名非跌倒者,他们在18岁及以上的住院患者中根据性别、年龄、临床科室和跌倒前的住院时间进行了匹配。使用SPSS for Windows 24.0版对收集的数据进行x2检验、Fisher精确检验、独立t检验和逻辑回归分析。结果:在低风险组中,排便障碍(比值比[OR]=12.49,95%置信区间[CI]=1.16~134.33,p=0.037)和通便药使用(OR=9.62,95%CI=2.14~43.22,p=0.003)是跌倒的统计学显著危险因素。在中等风险组中,定向障碍(OR=2.40,95%CI=1.11~5.19,p=0.026)是跌倒的一个具有统计学意义的危险因素。在高危组中,定向障碍(OR=12.54,95%CI=1.39~113.26,p=0.024)和使用降糖药(OR=5.39,95%CI=1.58~18.44,p=0.007)是跌倒的统计学显著危险因素。结论:本研究结果表明,不同跌倒风险组的跌倒风险因素不同。有必要使用针对跌倒风险群体的跌倒预防策略和经过相应修订的跌倒风险评估工具。
Risk Factors according to Fall Risk Level in General Hospital Inpatients
Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the predictors of falls according to the fall risk level in general hospital inpatients.Methods: Data were extracted from electronic medical records from January 2017 to December 2019. This study included 170 fallers and 340 non-fallers, who were matched for gender, age, clinical department, and length of stay before falls among inpatients aged 18 years and over. The collected data were analyzed with the x2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t-test, and logistic regression analysis using SPSS for Windows version 24.0.Results: In the low-risk group, defecation disorder (odds ratio [OR]=12.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16~134.33, p=.037) and laxative use (OR=9.62, 95% CI=2.14~43.22, p=.003) were statistically significant risk factors for falls. In the medium-risk group, disorientation (OR=2.40, 95% CI=1.11~5.19, p=.026) was a statistically significant risk factor for falls. In the high-risk group, disorientation (OR=12.54, 95% CI=1.39~113.26, p=.024) and hypoglycemic agent use (OR=5.39, 95% CI=1.58~18.44, p=.007) were statistically significant risk factors for falls.Conclusion: The results of this study show that risk factors for falls differed among the fall risk groups. It is necessary to use fall prevention strategies tailored to fall risk groups and fall risk assessment tools that have been revised accordingly.