跨孔尺寸和壁厚对弹性加压厚圆柱的影响

IF 3.4 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. K. Nziu, L. M. Masu
{"title":"跨孔尺寸和壁厚对弹性加压厚圆柱的影响","authors":"P. K. Nziu,&nbsp;L. M. Masu","doi":"10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed on closed-ended thick-walled cylinders with a radial cross bore under internal pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the behaviour of the hoop stress as well as to establish the optimal Stress Concentration Factors (SCF). Cylinders of thickness ratios of 3.0 down to 1.4 with cross bore size ratios (cross bore to main bore ratio) ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 were studied. The maximum hoop stress was found to increase with the increase in the cross bore size. Amongst the five different circular radial cross bore size ratios studied, the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1, gave the lowest hoop stress while the highest stress occurred with a cross bore size of 1.0. Moreover, the lowest SCF occurred in the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1 at a thickness ratio of 2.25 with a SCF magnitude of 2.836. This SCF magnitude indicated a reduction of pressure-carrying capacity of 64.7% in comparison to a similar plain cylinder without a cross bore.</p>","PeriodicalId":592,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross bore size and wall thickness effects on elastic pressurised thick cylinders\",\"authors\":\"P. K. Nziu,&nbsp;L. M. Masu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed on closed-ended thick-walled cylinders with a radial cross bore under internal pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the behaviour of the hoop stress as well as to establish the optimal Stress Concentration Factors (SCF). Cylinders of thickness ratios of 3.0 down to 1.4 with cross bore size ratios (cross bore to main bore ratio) ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 were studied. The maximum hoop stress was found to increase with the increase in the cross bore size. Amongst the five different circular radial cross bore size ratios studied, the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1, gave the lowest hoop stress while the highest stress occurred with a cross bore size of 1.0. Moreover, the lowest SCF occurred in the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1 at a thickness ratio of 2.25 with a SCF magnitude of 2.836. This SCF magnitude indicated a reduction of pressure-carrying capacity of 64.7% in comparison to a similar plain cylinder without a cross bore.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-019-0100-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对内压作用下具有径向交叉孔的厚壁封闭圆柱体进行了三维有限元分析。本研究的目的是确定环向应力的行为,并建立最佳应力集中系数(SCF)。研究了厚度比为3.0 ~ 1.4、交叉孔尺寸比(交叉孔与主孔比)为0.1 ~ 1.0的气缸。最大环向应力随横孔尺寸的增大而增大。在研究的5种不同的圆径向十字孔尺寸比中,最小的十字孔尺寸比为0.1时,产生的环向应力最小,而十字孔尺寸为1.0时产生的环向应力最大。当井厚比为2.25时,井径比最小为0.1,SCF值为2.836;该SCF量级表明,与没有十字孔的类似普通圆柱体相比,其承压能力降低了64.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross bore size and wall thickness effects on elastic pressurised thick cylinders

Cross bore size and wall thickness effects on elastic pressurised thick cylinders

Three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed on closed-ended thick-walled cylinders with a radial cross bore under internal pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the behaviour of the hoop stress as well as to establish the optimal Stress Concentration Factors (SCF). Cylinders of thickness ratios of 3.0 down to 1.4 with cross bore size ratios (cross bore to main bore ratio) ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 were studied. The maximum hoop stress was found to increase with the increase in the cross bore size. Amongst the five different circular radial cross bore size ratios studied, the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1, gave the lowest hoop stress while the highest stress occurred with a cross bore size of 1.0. Moreover, the lowest SCF occurred in the smallest cross bore size ratio of 0.1 at a thickness ratio of 2.25 with a SCF magnitude of 2.836. This SCF magnitude indicated a reduction of pressure-carrying capacity of 64.7% in comparison to a similar plain cylinder without a cross bore.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信