{"title":"拜占庭思想家帕奇梅雷斯哲学神学体系中的自然要素理论","authors":"Lydia Petridou, C. Terezis","doi":"10.5209/dmae.83577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss the general question on how a Byzantine philosopher-theologian of the late Palaeologan Renaissance forms some aspects of Natural Science. Specifically, focusing on George Pachymeres’ Paraphrasis of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite’s De divinis nominibus, we investigate how this philosopher builds his theory on the natural elements (earth, air, water, fire). We raise a number of questions that have to do with the way in which the elements exist, what is their relation to matter, how causality works in this case and whether priority is given to Ontology or Epistemology. From a methodological point of view, we approach the text scientifically, philosophically and theologically. The most important conclusion that we draw is that in this commentary George Pachymeres’ references on the elements can be placed into three categories (the elements 1. as the products of the divine energies; 2. as cosmological sources; 3. as allegorical names), depending on the context. Finally, we can contend that, although he does not present here a systematic theory on the elements, the Byzantine thinker, who has a thorough knowledge of both the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition, manages to conceive the concept of the “element”.","PeriodicalId":40181,"journal":{"name":"De Medio Aevo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The theory on the natural elements in the philosophical and theological system of the Byzantine thinker George Pachymeres\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Petridou, C. Terezis\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/dmae.83577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss the general question on how a Byzantine philosopher-theologian of the late Palaeologan Renaissance forms some aspects of Natural Science. Specifically, focusing on George Pachymeres’ Paraphrasis of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite’s De divinis nominibus, we investigate how this philosopher builds his theory on the natural elements (earth, air, water, fire). We raise a number of questions that have to do with the way in which the elements exist, what is their relation to matter, how causality works in this case and whether priority is given to Ontology or Epistemology. From a methodological point of view, we approach the text scientifically, philosophically and theologically. The most important conclusion that we draw is that in this commentary George Pachymeres’ references on the elements can be placed into three categories (the elements 1. as the products of the divine energies; 2. as cosmological sources; 3. as allegorical names), depending on the context. Finally, we can contend that, although he does not present here a systematic theory on the elements, the Byzantine thinker, who has a thorough knowledge of both the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition, manages to conceive the concept of the “element”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Medio Aevo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Medio Aevo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/dmae.83577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Medio Aevo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/dmae.83577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中,我们讨论了一个普遍的问题,即古罗马文艺复兴后期的拜占庭哲学家神学家是如何形成自然科学的某些方面的。具体来说,我们以乔治·帕奇梅雷斯的《拟酒神的Paraphrasis of PseudoDionysius》和阿留帕派的《De divis nominibus》为中心,探讨这位哲学家是如何将他的理论建立在自然元素(地球、空气、水、火)之上的。我们提出了许多问题,这些问题与元素的存在方式、它们与物质的关系、因果关系在这种情况下是如何运作的,以及是优先考虑本体论还是认识论有关。从方法论的角度,我们对文本进行科学、哲学和神学的处理。我们得出的最重要的结论是,在这篇评论中,George Pachymeres对元素的引用可以分为三类(元素1。作为神圣能量的产物;2.作为宇宙学的来源;3.作为寓言名称)。最后,我们可以说,尽管拜占庭思想家在这里没有提出一个关于元素的系统理论,但他对柏拉图和亚里士多德的传统都有深入的了解,他成功地构思了“元素”的概念。
The theory on the natural elements in the philosophical and theological system of the Byzantine thinker George Pachymeres
In this paper we discuss the general question on how a Byzantine philosopher-theologian of the late Palaeologan Renaissance forms some aspects of Natural Science. Specifically, focusing on George Pachymeres’ Paraphrasis of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite’s De divinis nominibus, we investigate how this philosopher builds his theory on the natural elements (earth, air, water, fire). We raise a number of questions that have to do with the way in which the elements exist, what is their relation to matter, how causality works in this case and whether priority is given to Ontology or Epistemology. From a methodological point of view, we approach the text scientifically, philosophically and theologically. The most important conclusion that we draw is that in this commentary George Pachymeres’ references on the elements can be placed into three categories (the elements 1. as the products of the divine energies; 2. as cosmological sources; 3. as allegorical names), depending on the context. Finally, we can contend that, although he does not present here a systematic theory on the elements, the Byzantine thinker, who has a thorough knowledge of both the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition, manages to conceive the concept of the “element”.