半个世纪以来对第一部教皇法令的研究(至约440年)

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
D. D'avray
{"title":"半个世纪以来对第一部教皇法令的研究(至约440年)","authors":"D. D'avray","doi":"10.1353/BMC.2018.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review article can be useful when contributions to a field are not only numerous but also too widely scattered for a specialist in the field, but not on that particular theme, to hold them easily before the mind. Articles and books on early papal decretals are scattered in more than one sense. They have appeared in a large number of journals not closely connected in theme, as well as in a recent burst of books, and they have come out of several different historiographical and national scholarly traditions. The object of all this research, on the other hand, can be tightly defined: the emergence of a tradition of papal decretals. The aim of the survey that follows is to bring these books and articles within a common frame. To list some highpoints of the recent work: in answer to the question ‘what was the first decretal’ there are scholarly answers by Christian Hornung, Alberto Ferreiro, Dominic Moreau and Yves-Marie Duval. For the key pontificate of Innocent I there is the unpublished thesis of Malcolm Green. On the development of papal power and ideology, key names are Walter Ullmann, Geoffrey Dunn, George Demacopoulos and Kristina Sessa. For the setting in late Roman imperial governmental culture, the compressed comments by Caroline Humfress can hardly be bettered. In her book Caroline Humfress puts the spotlight on a legal mentality around the papacy in a broad context of the pervasive influence of late Roman legal training:2","PeriodicalId":40554,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","volume":"35 1","pages":"331 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/BMC.2018.0007","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Half a Century of Research on the First Papal Decretals (to c. 440)\",\"authors\":\"D. D'avray\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/BMC.2018.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A review article can be useful when contributions to a field are not only numerous but also too widely scattered for a specialist in the field, but not on that particular theme, to hold them easily before the mind. Articles and books on early papal decretals are scattered in more than one sense. They have appeared in a large number of journals not closely connected in theme, as well as in a recent burst of books, and they have come out of several different historiographical and national scholarly traditions. The object of all this research, on the other hand, can be tightly defined: the emergence of a tradition of papal decretals. The aim of the survey that follows is to bring these books and articles within a common frame. To list some highpoints of the recent work: in answer to the question ‘what was the first decretal’ there are scholarly answers by Christian Hornung, Alberto Ferreiro, Dominic Moreau and Yves-Marie Duval. For the key pontificate of Innocent I there is the unpublished thesis of Malcolm Green. On the development of papal power and ideology, key names are Walter Ullmann, Geoffrey Dunn, George Demacopoulos and Kristina Sessa. For the setting in late Roman imperial governmental culture, the compressed comments by Caroline Humfress can hardly be bettered. In her book Caroline Humfress puts the spotlight on a legal mentality around the papacy in a broad context of the pervasive influence of late Roman legal training:2\",\"PeriodicalId\":40554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"331 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/BMC.2018.0007\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/BMC.2018.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/BMC.2018.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

当一篇综述文章对一个领域的贡献不仅众多,而且过于分散,以至于该领域的专家(而不是该特定主题的专家)无法轻易将其放在脑海中时,这篇文章可能会很有用。关于早期教皇法令的文章和书籍分散在不止一个意义上。它们出现在大量主题不紧密的期刊上,以及最近的一系列书籍中,它们来自几个不同的史学和国家学术传统。另一方面,所有这些研究的对象都可以被严格定义:教皇法令传统的出现。以下调查的目的是将这些书籍和文章放在一个共同的框架内。列出最近工作的一些亮点:在回答“第一项法令是什么”的问题时,有克里斯蒂安·霍农、阿尔贝托·费雷罗、多米尼克·莫罗和伊夫·玛丽·杜瓦尔的学术回答。马尔科姆·格林(Malcolm Green)未发表的论文是《无辜者一世》(Innocent I)的重要论断。关于教皇权力和意识形态的发展,关键人物是沃尔特·乌尔曼、杰弗里·邓恩、乔治·德马科普洛斯和克里斯蒂娜·塞萨。就罗马帝国后期政府文化的背景而言,卡罗琳·胡姆弗雷斯的压缩评论再好不过了。卡罗琳·胡姆弗雷斯(Caroline Humfres)在她的书中,将焦点放在了罗马后期法律培训的广泛影响下,围绕教皇的法律心态上:2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Half a Century of Research on the First Papal Decretals (to c. 440)
A review article can be useful when contributions to a field are not only numerous but also too widely scattered for a specialist in the field, but not on that particular theme, to hold them easily before the mind. Articles and books on early papal decretals are scattered in more than one sense. They have appeared in a large number of journals not closely connected in theme, as well as in a recent burst of books, and they have come out of several different historiographical and national scholarly traditions. The object of all this research, on the other hand, can be tightly defined: the emergence of a tradition of papal decretals. The aim of the survey that follows is to bring these books and articles within a common frame. To list some highpoints of the recent work: in answer to the question ‘what was the first decretal’ there are scholarly answers by Christian Hornung, Alberto Ferreiro, Dominic Moreau and Yves-Marie Duval. For the key pontificate of Innocent I there is the unpublished thesis of Malcolm Green. On the development of papal power and ideology, key names are Walter Ullmann, Geoffrey Dunn, George Demacopoulos and Kristina Sessa. For the setting in late Roman imperial governmental culture, the compressed comments by Caroline Humfress can hardly be bettered. In her book Caroline Humfress puts the spotlight on a legal mentality around the papacy in a broad context of the pervasive influence of late Roman legal training:2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信