对Hannah Archambault和Luke Pretz、Aaron Benanav和Ted Burczak的回应

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Fikret Adaman, P. Devine
{"title":"对Hannah Archambault和Luke Pretz、Aaron Benanav和Ted Burczak的回应","authors":"Fikret Adaman, P. Devine","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In responding to Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine’s essay “Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach,” Hannah Archambault and Luke Pretz, Aaron Benanav, and Ted Burczak at points reinforce the text’s positions, reinterpret arguments from different angles, complement arguments, and raise their own concerns. With gratitude, the authors here provide their own reflections on these responses, advocating for politically determined economic priorities, with negotiated-coordination bodies deciding the investments to realize those priorities and with market exchange at the enterprise level. This corresponds to a self-governing society in which the self-realization of individuals can be fully achieved and in which people have real autonomy to participate directly or indirectly in all levels of decision making that affect them.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Hannah Archambault and Luke Pretz, Aaron Benanav, and Ted Burczak\",\"authors\":\"Fikret Adaman, P. Devine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In responding to Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine’s essay “Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach,” Hannah Archambault and Luke Pretz, Aaron Benanav, and Ted Burczak at points reinforce the text’s positions, reinterpret arguments from different angles, complement arguments, and raise their own concerns. With gratitude, the authors here provide their own reflections on these responses, advocating for politically determined economic priorities, with negotiated-coordination bodies deciding the investments to realize those priorities and with market exchange at the enterprise level. This corresponds to a self-governing society in which the self-realization of individuals can be fully achieved and in which people have real autonomy to participate directly or indirectly in all levels of decision making that affect them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在回应Fikret Adaman和Pat Devine的文章《重新审视计算辩论:对多尺度方法的呼吁》时,Hannah Archambault和Luke Pretz、Aaron Benanav和Ted Burczak在各个方面强化了文本的立场,从不同角度重新解释了论点,补充了论点,并提出了他们自己的担忧。怀着感激之情,作者们在这里对这些回应进行了自己的思考,倡导政治上确定的经济优先事项,通过谈判的协调机构决定实现这些优先事项的投资,并在企业层面进行市场交流。这对应于一个自治社会,在这个社会中,个人的自我实现可以完全实现,人们有真正的自主权,可以直接或间接参与影响他们的各级决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Hannah Archambault and Luke Pretz, Aaron Benanav, and Ted Burczak
In responding to Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine’s essay “Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach,” Hannah Archambault and Luke Pretz, Aaron Benanav, and Ted Burczak at points reinforce the text’s positions, reinterpret arguments from different angles, complement arguments, and raise their own concerns. With gratitude, the authors here provide their own reflections on these responses, advocating for politically determined economic priorities, with negotiated-coordination bodies deciding the investments to realize those priorities and with market exchange at the enterprise level. This corresponds to a self-governing society in which the self-realization of individuals can be fully achieved and in which people have real autonomy to participate directly or indirectly in all levels of decision making that affect them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信