自主人工智能代理的事实责任。事物、机构和法律行为者

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Jurist Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI:10.1515/gj-2019-0054

M. W. Monterossi

{"title":"自主人工智能代理的事实责任。事物、机构和法律行为者","authors":"M. W. Monterossi","doi":"10.1515/gj-2019-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract European Union institutions are currently studying the regulatory intervention needed to face liability problems solicited by the use of autonomous artificial agents, whose unforeseeable actions may result in damage for their users or third parties. This paper intends to analyze some of the solutions proposed, by putting in relation – also from a historical perspective – the possibility of widening producers’ or users’ strict liability for actions by artificial agents even when they are not fully predictable and that of extending the status of legal actor to some of these artificial agents, so as to attribute the damaging fact directly to them.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/gj-2019-0054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liability for the Fact of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents. Things, Agencies and Legal Actors\",\"authors\":\"M. W. Monterossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/gj-2019-0054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract European Union institutions are currently studying the regulatory intervention needed to face liability problems solicited by the use of autonomous artificial agents, whose unforeseeable actions may result in damage for their users or third parties. This paper intends to analyze some of the solutions proposed, by putting in relation – also from a historical perspective – the possibility of widening producers’ or users’ strict liability for actions by artificial agents even when they are not fully predictable and that of extending the status of legal actor to some of these artificial agents, so as to attribute the damaging fact directly to them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Jurist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/gj-2019-0054\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Jurist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要欧盟各机构目前正在研究应对使用自主人工智能所引起的责任问题所需的监管干预措施，这些人工智能的不可预见行为可能会对其用户或第三方造成损害。本文旨在分析所提出的一些解决方案，通过将生产者或用户对人工代理人的行为的严格责任扩大的可能性——也从历史的角度来看——以及将法律行为人的地位扩大到其中一些人工代理人的可能性，从而将破坏性事实直接归因于他们。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Liability for the Fact of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents. Things, Agencies and Legal Actors

Abstract European Union institutions are currently studying the regulatory intervention needed to face liability problems solicited by the use of autonomous artificial agents, whose unforeseeable actions may result in damage for their users or third parties. This paper intends to analyze some of the solutions proposed, by putting in relation – also from a historical perspective – the possibility of widening producers’ or users’ strict liability for actions by artificial agents even when they are not fully predictable and that of extending the status of legal actor to some of these artificial agents, so as to attribute the damaging fact directly to them.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.