反对Truthmaker极大主义的短论

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY

Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1515/mp-2021-0017

O. Bondar

{"title":"反对Truthmaker极大主义的短论","authors":"O. Bondar","doi":"10.1515/mp-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Mark Jago has introduced a short Fitch-style argument for truthmaker maximalism – the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker. In response to Jago, Trueman argues that the Fitch-style reasoning allows us to prove the opposite – no truth has a truthmaker. In the article, we consider the debates between Jago’s truthmaker maximalism and Trueman’s truthmaker nihilism. Also, we introduce a short Grim-style argument against Jago’s truthmaker maximalism.","PeriodicalId":43147,"journal":{"name":"Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Short Argument against Truthmaker Maximalism\",\"authors\":\"O. Bondar\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/mp-2021-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Mark Jago has introduced a short Fitch-style argument for truthmaker maximalism – the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker. In response to Jago, Trueman argues that the Fitch-style reasoning allows us to prove the opposite – no truth has a truthmaker. In the article, we consider the debates between Jago’s truthmaker maximalism and Trueman’s truthmaker nihilism. Also, we introduce a short Grim-style argument against Jago’s truthmaker maximalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2021-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2021-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要Mark Jago为真理制造者最大主义提出了一个简短的惠誉式论点，即每个真理都有一个真理制造者。作为对Jago的回应，Trueman认为惠誉式的推理可以让我们证明相反的情况——没有真相可以证明真相。在这篇文章中，我们考虑了贾戈的真理最大主义和特鲁曼的真理虚无主义之间的争论。此外，我们还介绍了一个简短的格林风格的论点，反对贾戈的真理制造者最大主义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Short Argument against Truthmaker Maximalism

Abstract Mark Jago has introduced a short Fitch-style argument for truthmaker maximalism – the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker. In response to Jago, Trueman argues that the Fitch-style reasoning allows us to prove the opposite – no truth has a truthmaker. In the article, we consider the debates between Jago’s truthmaker maximalism and Trueman’s truthmaker nihilism. Also, we introduce a short Grim-style argument against Jago’s truthmaker maximalism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Metaphysica-International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

50.00%

发文量