目的和手段:具有人类发展和多重因果关系的发展政策评估

Q3 Social Sciences
Pablo Garcés Velástegui
{"title":"目的和手段:具有人类发展和多重因果关系的发展政策评估","authors":"Pablo Garcés Velástegui","doi":"10.13043/dys.83.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy assessment often involves the study of outcomes and their causes. Deve¬lopment policy analyses have conventionally used an economistic perspective with a focus mainly on pecuniary indicators and the search for the one model of best fit. However, i) if development policy outcomes are ultimately to be assessed in terms of people’s quality of life; and, ii) if policies establish simi¬lar outcomes for different people in different contexts, alternative approaches seem required to study a policy’s ends and means. As such, this article advan¬ces the combined use of the Human Development and Capability Approach with fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a promising option. While the former, being a people-centred framework, can contribute to assess policy ends, the latter, enabling the study of multiple conjunctural causation, can shed light on the diverse means leading to them.","PeriodicalId":52469,"journal":{"name":"Desarrollo y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of ends and means: Development policy assessment with human development and multiple causality\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Garcés Velástegui\",\"doi\":\"10.13043/dys.83.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy assessment often involves the study of outcomes and their causes. Deve¬lopment policy analyses have conventionally used an economistic perspective with a focus mainly on pecuniary indicators and the search for the one model of best fit. However, i) if development policy outcomes are ultimately to be assessed in terms of people’s quality of life; and, ii) if policies establish simi¬lar outcomes for different people in different contexts, alternative approaches seem required to study a policy’s ends and means. As such, this article advan¬ces the combined use of the Human Development and Capability Approach with fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a promising option. While the former, being a people-centred framework, can contribute to assess policy ends, the latter, enabling the study of multiple conjunctural causation, can shed light on the diverse means leading to them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Desarrollo y Sociedad\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Desarrollo y Sociedad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13043/dys.83.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desarrollo y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13043/dys.83.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

政策评估通常涉及对结果及其原因的研究。发展政策分析通常使用经济学观点,主要关注金钱指标和寻找最适合的模型。然而,i)发展政策的结果是否最终要从人民的生活质量方面进行评估;以及,ii)如果政策在不同的背景下为不同的人建立了相似的结果,那么似乎需要其他方法来研究政策的目的和手段。因此,本文建议将人类发展和能力方法与模糊集定性比较分析相结合,作为一种很有前途的选择。前者是一个以人为中心的框架,有助于评估政策目的,而后者有助于研究多重连词因果关系,可以揭示导致政策目的的多种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of ends and means: Development policy assessment with human development and multiple causality
Policy assessment often involves the study of outcomes and their causes. Deve¬lopment policy analyses have conventionally used an economistic perspective with a focus mainly on pecuniary indicators and the search for the one model of best fit. However, i) if development policy outcomes are ultimately to be assessed in terms of people’s quality of life; and, ii) if policies establish simi¬lar outcomes for different people in different contexts, alternative approaches seem required to study a policy’s ends and means. As such, this article advan¬ces the combined use of the Human Development and Capability Approach with fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a promising option. While the former, being a people-centred framework, can contribute to assess policy ends, the latter, enabling the study of multiple conjunctural causation, can shed light on the diverse means leading to them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Desarrollo y Sociedad
Desarrollo y Sociedad Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad is an academic and open access journal, published each semester, that belongs to the Centro de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Sociedad (CEDE) of the School of Economics at Universidad de los Andes (Colombia). The journal seeks to disseminate the investigations and academic projects develop at Universities and Research Centers, at a national and international level; it is addressed to economists and researchers of related fields. The special editions are selected aiming to choose topics highly relevant to the area of Economy. The call for papers is permanently open.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信