网络、行动主义和公众动员。集体行动和关联行动

Q3 Social Sciences
Isabel Babo
{"title":"网络、行动主义和公众动员。集体行动和关联行动","authors":"Isabel Babo","doi":"10.20287/EC.N27.V1.A14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the common and dominant use of digital social networks, new communication and collective mobilization practices emerged, as well as new configurations of acting and manifesting in public. In this essay, we ask where collective action begins and ends in relation to the connective action (Bennett and Segerberg, 2012), admitting that these modalities or logics of action can be mitigated, in a hybrid regime. To do this, we begin by understanding communication as both action and participation, then examine collective, situated and public action and finally consider the connective action. We intend to discuss the permeable boundaries between connective action and collective action, with reference to the movement “Que se lixe a Troika” (“To hell with troika!”), which emerged on digital social networks and had protests on the street in the 15th September 2012 and the 2th March 2013. At the same time, the network’s activism and the mobilization in the street are questioned. Therefore, the purpose is to question if the digitally networked action or the connective action, which brings together several users, can constitute a collective action.","PeriodicalId":55854,"journal":{"name":"Estudos em Comunicacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redes, ativismo e mobilizações públicas. Ação coletiva e ação conectada\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Babo\",\"doi\":\"10.20287/EC.N27.V1.A14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the common and dominant use of digital social networks, new communication and collective mobilization practices emerged, as well as new configurations of acting and manifesting in public. In this essay, we ask where collective action begins and ends in relation to the connective action (Bennett and Segerberg, 2012), admitting that these modalities or logics of action can be mitigated, in a hybrid regime. To do this, we begin by understanding communication as both action and participation, then examine collective, situated and public action and finally consider the connective action. We intend to discuss the permeable boundaries between connective action and collective action, with reference to the movement “Que se lixe a Troika” (“To hell with troika!”), which emerged on digital social networks and had protests on the street in the 15th September 2012 and the 2th March 2013. At the same time, the network’s activism and the mobilization in the street are questioned. Therefore, the purpose is to question if the digitally networked action or the connective action, which brings together several users, can constitute a collective action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos em Comunicacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos em Comunicacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N27.V1.A14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos em Comunicacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N27.V1.A14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着数字社交网络的普遍和主导使用,出现了新的沟通和集体动员实践,以及在公共场合表演和表现的新配置。在这篇文章中,我们询问了集体行动相对于连接行动的起点和终点(Bennett和Segerberg,2012),承认在混合制度中,这些行动模式或逻辑可以得到缓解。为此,我们首先将沟通理解为行动和参与,然后考察集体行动、情境行动和公共行动,最后考虑联系行动。我们打算讨论连接行动和集体行动之间的可渗透边界,参考“三驾马车去死吧!”运动,该运动出现在数字社交网络上,并于2012年9月15日和2013年3月2日在街头举行抗议。与此同时,该网络的行动主义和街头动员也受到质疑。因此,目的是质疑数字网络行动或将几个用户聚集在一起的连接行动是否可以构成集体行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redes, ativismo e mobilizações públicas. Ação coletiva e ação conectada
With the common and dominant use of digital social networks, new communication and collective mobilization practices emerged, as well as new configurations of acting and manifesting in public. In this essay, we ask where collective action begins and ends in relation to the connective action (Bennett and Segerberg, 2012), admitting that these modalities or logics of action can be mitigated, in a hybrid regime. To do this, we begin by understanding communication as both action and participation, then examine collective, situated and public action and finally consider the connective action. We intend to discuss the permeable boundaries between connective action and collective action, with reference to the movement “Que se lixe a Troika” (“To hell with troika!”), which emerged on digital social networks and had protests on the street in the 15th September 2012 and the 2th March 2013. At the same time, the network’s activism and the mobilization in the street are questioned. Therefore, the purpose is to question if the digitally networked action or the connective action, which brings together several users, can constitute a collective action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudos em Comunicacao
Estudos em Comunicacao Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The main guidelines of the Journal editorial policy are oriented to the concepts of "citizenship" and "participation", understood from a communicational point of view, involving processes and devices of knowledge circulation and opinion formation in the political field in general, and in specific areas of public policy such as health, education, science culture, public opinion, gender and identity. As examples of priority interests areas one finds the following: journalism and public opinion; citizen, participatory and public journalism; responsibility and accountability of institutions, governments and companies; media and public sphere; social movements in the areas of environment, science, health, ecology, culture, identity and gender; media and political parties; political representation; new forms of online participation; methods of analysis of participation; digital democracy; media, deliberation and participation; communitarian communication; communication and development; policies of recognition and comparative studies of communication in different geographical and cultural contexts, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信