比利时药物使用治疗的非国家客户

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology
C. Kock, E. Blomme, J. Antoine
{"title":"比利时药物使用治疗的非国家客户","authors":"C. Kock, E. Blomme, J. Antoine","doi":"10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSubstance use treatment (SUT) among migrants and ethnic minorities is an underresearched domain in European countries, although preliminary studies point out disparities in treatment use and access compared to general populations. This paper aims to identify the main characteristics of and the types of services solicited by non-nationals in Belgium.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper compares the types of SUT services used by Belgian and non-national clients. Second, the referral source for Belgian and non-national clients is considered. Third, the study compares the client characteristics of Belgian and non-national clients. This descriptive analysis is based on aggregated data sets in the European treatment demand indicator (TDI) registry including all Belgian treatment episodes between 2012 and 2014.\n\n\nFindings\nNon-national clients were more often located in outpatient SUT and were less often referred by general practitioners and hospitals, compared to Belgian clients. Third-country clients appear to have lower socioeconomic statuses (education, employment, housing) than Belgian clients. Non-national youngsters and third-country females appear to be underrepresented in Belgian SUT compared to their presence in the general population. The gender gap is larger among third-country clients than among Belgian clients.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThese associations between nationality and solicited services, gender, education, employment, housing and referral document treatment gaps among some non-nationals that require special attention in targeted treatment. In the European context, further research is needed on better monitoring migration background in the European TDI registries.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe overrepresentation of non-nationals in low-threshold opioid substitution treatment services and their underrepresentation in high-threshold residential services requires an in-depth analysis of the core goals of these respective services. Residential services, for instance, should consider how a dominant focus on speech therapy hampers access to treatment for these populations and how access for these populations could be enhanced by modifying or diversifying methods in treatment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that analyses the national indicator in a European TDI data set.\n","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-national clients in Belgian substance use treatment\",\"authors\":\"C. Kock, E. Blomme, J. Antoine\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nSubstance use treatment (SUT) among migrants and ethnic minorities is an underresearched domain in European countries, although preliminary studies point out disparities in treatment use and access compared to general populations. This paper aims to identify the main characteristics of and the types of services solicited by non-nationals in Belgium.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper compares the types of SUT services used by Belgian and non-national clients. Second, the referral source for Belgian and non-national clients is considered. Third, the study compares the client characteristics of Belgian and non-national clients. This descriptive analysis is based on aggregated data sets in the European treatment demand indicator (TDI) registry including all Belgian treatment episodes between 2012 and 2014.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nNon-national clients were more often located in outpatient SUT and were less often referred by general practitioners and hospitals, compared to Belgian clients. Third-country clients appear to have lower socioeconomic statuses (education, employment, housing) than Belgian clients. Non-national youngsters and third-country females appear to be underrepresented in Belgian SUT compared to their presence in the general population. The gender gap is larger among third-country clients than among Belgian clients.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThese associations between nationality and solicited services, gender, education, employment, housing and referral document treatment gaps among some non-nationals that require special attention in targeted treatment. In the European context, further research is needed on better monitoring migration background in the European TDI registries.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe overrepresentation of non-nationals in low-threshold opioid substitution treatment services and their underrepresentation in high-threshold residential services requires an in-depth analysis of the core goals of these respective services. Residential services, for instance, should consider how a dominant focus on speech therapy hampers access to treatment for these populations and how access for these populations could be enhanced by modifying or diversifying methods in treatment.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that analyses the national indicator in a European TDI data set.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs and Alcohol Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-12-2019-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的在欧洲国家,移民和少数民族的物质使用治疗(SUT)是一个研究不足的领域,尽管初步研究指出,与普通人群相比,在治疗使用和获得方面存在差异。本文旨在确定非比利时国民所要求的服务的主要特点和类型。设计/方法/方法本文比较了比利时和非国家客户使用的SUT服务类型。其次,考虑了比利时和非本国客户的转介来源。第三,本研究比较了比利时和非本国客户的客户特征。该描述性分析基于欧洲治疗需求指标(TDI)注册中心的汇总数据集,包括2012年至2014年期间比利时的所有治疗事件。与比利时客户相比,非国籍客户更经常出现在门诊SUT,全科医生和医院转诊的频率更低。第三国客户的社会经济地位(教育、就业、住房)似乎低于比利时客户。与普通人群相比,非本国青少年和第三国女性在比利时SUT中的代表性似乎不足。第三国客户的性别差距大于比利时客户。研究局限性/影响国籍和所需服务、性别、教育、就业、住房和转诊之间的这些关联记录了一些非国民的治疗差距,需要在有针对性的治疗中给予特别关注。在欧洲背景下,需要进一步研究如何更好地监测欧洲TDI登记处的移民背景。实际含义非国民在低阈值阿片类药物替代治疗服务中的比例过高,而在高阈值住院服务中的代表性不足,需要对这些服务的核心目标进行深入分析。例如,住宿服务应考虑对言语治疗的主要关注如何阻碍这些人群获得治疗,以及如何通过修改或多样化治疗方法来提高这些人群的治疗机会。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇分析欧洲TDI数据集中的国家指标的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-national clients in Belgian substance use treatment
Purpose Substance use treatment (SUT) among migrants and ethnic minorities is an underresearched domain in European countries, although preliminary studies point out disparities in treatment use and access compared to general populations. This paper aims to identify the main characteristics of and the types of services solicited by non-nationals in Belgium. Design/methodology/approach This paper compares the types of SUT services used by Belgian and non-national clients. Second, the referral source for Belgian and non-national clients is considered. Third, the study compares the client characteristics of Belgian and non-national clients. This descriptive analysis is based on aggregated data sets in the European treatment demand indicator (TDI) registry including all Belgian treatment episodes between 2012 and 2014. Findings Non-national clients were more often located in outpatient SUT and were less often referred by general practitioners and hospitals, compared to Belgian clients. Third-country clients appear to have lower socioeconomic statuses (education, employment, housing) than Belgian clients. Non-national youngsters and third-country females appear to be underrepresented in Belgian SUT compared to their presence in the general population. The gender gap is larger among third-country clients than among Belgian clients. Research limitations/implications These associations between nationality and solicited services, gender, education, employment, housing and referral document treatment gaps among some non-nationals that require special attention in targeted treatment. In the European context, further research is needed on better monitoring migration background in the European TDI registries. Practical implications The overrepresentation of non-nationals in low-threshold opioid substitution treatment services and their underrepresentation in high-threshold residential services requires an in-depth analysis of the core goals of these respective services. Residential services, for instance, should consider how a dominant focus on speech therapy hampers access to treatment for these populations and how access for these populations could be enhanced by modifying or diversifying methods in treatment. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that analyses the national indicator in a European TDI data set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信