多学科团队治疗老年髋部骨折

Q4 Medicine
Zhenwei Wang, Di Ai, Teng Zhang, Meng Yu, Li Hongchuan, L. Peng, Daxin Yu, Guoqiang Chen, Xiao-ming Yuan, Fang Yu, Liu Wei, Q. Yao
{"title":"多学科团队治疗老年髋部骨折","authors":"Zhenwei Wang, Di Ai, Teng Zhang, Meng Yu, Li Hongchuan, L. Peng, Daxin Yu, Guoqiang Chen, Xiao-ming Yuan, Fang Yu, Liu Wei, Q. Yao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20191006-00343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore multidisciplinary team (MDT) for the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective analysis was done of the 196 elderly patients who had been admitted to Department of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital from September 2017 to December 2018 for hip fractures. They were divided into 2 groups depending on whether MDT had been applied or not. In the MDT group of 102 patients, there were 43 males and 59 females with an age of 81.9±8.4 years, and 63 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. In the traditional treatment group of 94 patients, there were 37 males and 57 females with an age of 81.3±8.6 years, and 55 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. The 2 groups were compared in terms of complications and mortality during hospitalization, interval from admission to surgery, total hospital stay, and Harris hip scores at 6 months after surgery. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no statistically significant differences in general data before surgery between the 2 groups, indicating comparability (P>0.05). Eighty-four patients (89.4%) in the traditional treatment group and 98 patients (96.1%) in the MDT group underwent surgery, showing no significant difference between the groups (χ2=3.327, P=0.068). In the patients undergoing surgery in the MDT group, the incidences of postoperative delirium [12.2% (12/98)], pulmonary infection [11.2% (11/98)], cardiogenic disease [13.3%(13/98)], electrolyte disturbance[12.2%(12/98)] and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity [6.1% (6/98)] were significantly lower, the interval from admission to surgery (1.9 d±0.9 d) and total hospital stay (10.2 d±0.9 d) significantly shorter, and Harris hip scores (81.3±6.2) at 6 months after surgery significantly higher than those in the patients undergoing surgery in the traditional treatment group [31.0%(26/84), 22.6% (19/84), 25.0% (21/84), 28.6% (24/84), 16.7%(14/84); 3.1 d±1.6 d and 14.1 d±6.2 d; 75.4±7.8; respectively] (all P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nIn the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly, multidisciplinary team is effective in reducing complications during hospitalization, shortening the interval from admission to surgery and total hospital stay, and promoting functional recovery of the hip. \n \n \nKey words: \nHip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails; Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Multidisciplinary team","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"200-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary team for treatment of hip fracture in the elderly\",\"authors\":\"Zhenwei Wang, Di Ai, Teng Zhang, Meng Yu, Li Hongchuan, L. Peng, Daxin Yu, Guoqiang Chen, Xiao-ming Yuan, Fang Yu, Liu Wei, Q. Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20191006-00343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore multidisciplinary team (MDT) for the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA retrospective analysis was done of the 196 elderly patients who had been admitted to Department of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital from September 2017 to December 2018 for hip fractures. They were divided into 2 groups depending on whether MDT had been applied or not. In the MDT group of 102 patients, there were 43 males and 59 females with an age of 81.9±8.4 years, and 63 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. In the traditional treatment group of 94 patients, there were 37 males and 57 females with an age of 81.3±8.6 years, and 55 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. The 2 groups were compared in terms of complications and mortality during hospitalization, interval from admission to surgery, total hospital stay, and Harris hip scores at 6 months after surgery. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no statistically significant differences in general data before surgery between the 2 groups, indicating comparability (P>0.05). Eighty-four patients (89.4%) in the traditional treatment group and 98 patients (96.1%) in the MDT group underwent surgery, showing no significant difference between the groups (χ2=3.327, P=0.068). In the patients undergoing surgery in the MDT group, the incidences of postoperative delirium [12.2% (12/98)], pulmonary infection [11.2% (11/98)], cardiogenic disease [13.3%(13/98)], electrolyte disturbance[12.2%(12/98)] and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity [6.1% (6/98)] were significantly lower, the interval from admission to surgery (1.9 d±0.9 d) and total hospital stay (10.2 d±0.9 d) significantly shorter, and Harris hip scores (81.3±6.2) at 6 months after surgery significantly higher than those in the patients undergoing surgery in the traditional treatment group [31.0%(26/84), 22.6% (19/84), 25.0% (21/84), 28.6% (24/84), 16.7%(14/84); 3.1 d±1.6 d and 14.1 d±6.2 d; 75.4±7.8; respectively] (all P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nIn the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly, multidisciplinary team is effective in reducing complications during hospitalization, shortening the interval from admission to surgery and total hospital stay, and promoting functional recovery of the hip. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails; Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Multidisciplinary team\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"200-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20191006-00343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20191006-00343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨多学科团队治疗老年髋部骨折的方法。方法对2017年9月至2018年12月入住北京世纪坛医院关节外科的196例老年髋部骨折患者进行回顾性分析。根据是否应用MDT将他们分为两组。在由102名患者组成的MDT组中,43名男性和59名女性,年龄81.9±8.4岁,63名股骨颈骨折和39名股骨转子间骨折。传统治疗组94例,男37例,女57例,年龄81.3±8.6岁,股骨颈骨折55例,股骨粗隆间骨折39例。比较两组患者在住院期间的并发症和死亡率、从入院到手术的间隔时间、总住院时间和手术后6个月的Harris髋关节评分。结果两组手术前的一般数据无统计学显著差异,表明具有可比性(P>0.05)。传统治疗组84例(89.4%)和MDT组98例(96.1%)接受了手术,两组之间无显著差异(χ2=3.327,P=0.068),术后谵妄的发生率[12.2%(12/98)]、肺部感染[11.2%(11/98)],心源性疾病[13.3%(13/98)]和电解质紊乱[12.2%(12/1998)]以及下肢深静脉血栓形成[6.1%(6/98)]显著降低,入院间隔(1.9d±0.9d)和总住院时间(10.2d±0.9D)显著缩短,Harris髋关节评分(81.3±6.2)显著高于传统治疗组手术患者[31.0%(26/84),22.6%(19/84),25.0%(21/84),28.6%(24/84),16.7%(14/84);分别为3.1d±1.6d和14.1d±6.2d;75.4±7.8;(均P<0.05),多学科团队在减少住院并发症、缩短从入院到手术的间隔和总住院时间、促进髋关节功能恢复方面是有效的。关键词:髋部骨折;骨折固定,髓内;骨钉;关节成形术、置换术、髋关节;多学科团队
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidisciplinary team for treatment of hip fracture in the elderly
Objective To explore multidisciplinary team (MDT) for the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly. Methods A retrospective analysis was done of the 196 elderly patients who had been admitted to Department of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital from September 2017 to December 2018 for hip fractures. They were divided into 2 groups depending on whether MDT had been applied or not. In the MDT group of 102 patients, there were 43 males and 59 females with an age of 81.9±8.4 years, and 63 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. In the traditional treatment group of 94 patients, there were 37 males and 57 females with an age of 81.3±8.6 years, and 55 femoral neck fractures and 39 intertrochanteric fractures. The 2 groups were compared in terms of complications and mortality during hospitalization, interval from admission to surgery, total hospital stay, and Harris hip scores at 6 months after surgery. Results There were no statistically significant differences in general data before surgery between the 2 groups, indicating comparability (P>0.05). Eighty-four patients (89.4%) in the traditional treatment group and 98 patients (96.1%) in the MDT group underwent surgery, showing no significant difference between the groups (χ2=3.327, P=0.068). In the patients undergoing surgery in the MDT group, the incidences of postoperative delirium [12.2% (12/98)], pulmonary infection [11.2% (11/98)], cardiogenic disease [13.3%(13/98)], electrolyte disturbance[12.2%(12/98)] and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity [6.1% (6/98)] were significantly lower, the interval from admission to surgery (1.9 d±0.9 d) and total hospital stay (10.2 d±0.9 d) significantly shorter, and Harris hip scores (81.3±6.2) at 6 months after surgery significantly higher than those in the patients undergoing surgery in the traditional treatment group [31.0%(26/84), 22.6% (19/84), 25.0% (21/84), 28.6% (24/84), 16.7%(14/84); 3.1 d±1.6 d and 14.1 d±6.2 d; 75.4±7.8; respectively] (all P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly, multidisciplinary team is effective in reducing complications during hospitalization, shortening the interval from admission to surgery and total hospital stay, and promoting functional recovery of the hip. Key words: Hip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails; Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Multidisciplinary team
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信