印尼反生态板加固的法制建设

Yuridika Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30383
Mia Banulita, Titik Utami
{"title":"印尼反生态板加固的法制建设","authors":"Mia Banulita, Titik Utami","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SLAPP does not only occur in the environmental sector but in any situation which act aims to stop or eliminate public participation in aggression against certain policies. In the environmental sector, it is referred to as Eco-SLAPP which aims to provide fear, silence, and intimidation toward people who commit aggression against environmental policies and/or certain interests through reporting/complaints or lawsuits to court. Therefore, the Anti-Eco-SLAPP concept in Law Number 32 of 2009 was raised to provide protection against the act of Eco-SLAPP since it harms people who fight for good and healthy environment. Unfortunately, weakness is found in Law Number 32 of 2009 regarding substance and process in fulfilling Anti Eco-SLAPP. In terms of substance, Article 2 letter a Law Number 32 of 2009 has not given the state responsibility to implement Anti Eco-SLAPP, Article 66 Law Number 32 of 2009 has not regulated good faith as the reason a person cannot be prosecuted criminally or sued civilly, protection from administrative action, and motion strike/dismissal process and SLAPP Back, to prevent early Eco-SLAPP actions. In addition, the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP is often misinterpreted since it is unable to distinguish pure criminal acts and actions to fight for the environment based on good faith. Based on this, it is necessary to construct an Anti Eco-SLAPP law based on the weaknesses of the existing Law Number 32 of 2009, so as to reinforce the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Construction of Anti-Eco-Slapp Reinforcement In Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Mia Banulita, Titik Utami\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SLAPP does not only occur in the environmental sector but in any situation which act aims to stop or eliminate public participation in aggression against certain policies. In the environmental sector, it is referred to as Eco-SLAPP which aims to provide fear, silence, and intimidation toward people who commit aggression against environmental policies and/or certain interests through reporting/complaints or lawsuits to court. Therefore, the Anti-Eco-SLAPP concept in Law Number 32 of 2009 was raised to provide protection against the act of Eco-SLAPP since it harms people who fight for good and healthy environment. Unfortunately, weakness is found in Law Number 32 of 2009 regarding substance and process in fulfilling Anti Eco-SLAPP. In terms of substance, Article 2 letter a Law Number 32 of 2009 has not given the state responsibility to implement Anti Eco-SLAPP, Article 66 Law Number 32 of 2009 has not regulated good faith as the reason a person cannot be prosecuted criminally or sued civilly, protection from administrative action, and motion strike/dismissal process and SLAPP Back, to prevent early Eco-SLAPP actions. In addition, the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP is often misinterpreted since it is unable to distinguish pure criminal acts and actions to fight for the environment based on good faith. Based on this, it is necessary to construct an Anti Eco-SLAPP law based on the weaknesses of the existing Law Number 32 of 2009, so as to reinforce the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yuridika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yuridika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

SLAPP不仅发生在环境部门,而且发生在任何旨在阻止或消除公众参与侵犯某些政策的情况下。在环境部门,它被称为生态SLAPP,旨在通过向法院报告/投诉或诉讼,向侵犯环境政策和/或某些利益的人提供恐惧、沉默和恐吓。因此,2009年第32号法律中提出了反生态SLAPP的概念,以保护人们免受生态SLAPP行为的侵害,因为它伤害了为良好健康环境而战的人们。不幸的是,2009年第32号法律在履行反生态SLAPP的实质和过程方面存在缺陷。就实质内容而言,2009年第32号法律第2条第a款没有赋予国家实施反生态SLAPP的责任,2009年的第32号第66条法律没有规定诚信是一个人不能被刑事起诉或民事起诉的原因,保护他免受行政诉讼,以及动议罢工/解雇程序和SLAPP Back,以防止早期的生态SLAPP行动。此外,反生态SLAPP的实施经常被误解,因为它无法区分纯粹的犯罪行为和基于善意为环境而战的行为。基于此,有必要在现有2009年第32号法律的基础上构建一部反生态SLAPP法律,以加强反生态SLPP在印度尼西亚的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Construction of Anti-Eco-Slapp Reinforcement In Indonesia
SLAPP does not only occur in the environmental sector but in any situation which act aims to stop or eliminate public participation in aggression against certain policies. In the environmental sector, it is referred to as Eco-SLAPP which aims to provide fear, silence, and intimidation toward people who commit aggression against environmental policies and/or certain interests through reporting/complaints or lawsuits to court. Therefore, the Anti-Eco-SLAPP concept in Law Number 32 of 2009 was raised to provide protection against the act of Eco-SLAPP since it harms people who fight for good and healthy environment. Unfortunately, weakness is found in Law Number 32 of 2009 regarding substance and process in fulfilling Anti Eco-SLAPP. In terms of substance, Article 2 letter a Law Number 32 of 2009 has not given the state responsibility to implement Anti Eco-SLAPP, Article 66 Law Number 32 of 2009 has not regulated good faith as the reason a person cannot be prosecuted criminally or sued civilly, protection from administrative action, and motion strike/dismissal process and SLAPP Back, to prevent early Eco-SLAPP actions. In addition, the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP is often misinterpreted since it is unable to distinguish pure criminal acts and actions to fight for the environment based on good faith. Based on this, it is necessary to construct an Anti Eco-SLAPP law based on the weaknesses of the existing Law Number 32 of 2009, so as to reinforce the implementation of Anti Eco-SLAPP in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信