现代蝎子谱系中身体组织的进化史

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Haug, P. Wagner, J. Haug
{"title":"现代蝎子谱系中身体组织的进化史","authors":"C. Haug, P. Wagner, J. Haug","doi":"10.3140/bull.geosci.1750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Euarthropoda is extremely successful in evolutionary terms. Part of this success has been attributed to one evolutionary “strategy”: the stem species of Euarthropoda had a body with numerous segments, each of these segments bearing a pair of appendages, all of these subsimilar (e.g. Maas & Waloszek 2001; Haug J.T. et al. 2013, fig. 2.3.b, and references therein). Different lineages of Euarthropoda varied this ancestrally uniform body. Several adjacent segments were modified in groups, forming then functional units for specific needs. Such functional units, tagmata, may perform sensory functions, locomotion, feeding, respiration or other tasks. With this background we should expect that tagmosis, the subdivision of the body into several functional units, evolves within the different lineages of Euarthropoda, leading to very different patterns of body organisation between the different lineages as well as within one lineage (partly this morphological diversity or disparity appears to be a result of developmental plasticity, see e.g. Moczek 2010, Moczek et al. 2011, Minelli 2016 and references therein). Yet, in many lineages the pattern appears to be fixed already quite early within a lineage. For example, Euchelicerata, the group including spiders, scorpions and all their relatives, is generally thought to have a stereotypic tagmosis pattern. The ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6 are supposed to form the so-called prosoma; post-ocular segments 7–19 supposedly form the opisthosoma (see Dunlop & Lamsdell 2017 for a recent discussion). However, when looking closely at many eucheliceratan ingroups this is not quite that obvious or at least not as simple as often stated (see e.g. discussion in Haug C. et al. 2012a). Here we want to consider the evolution of the tagmosis in modern scorpions. Generally, modern scorpions have been considered to be organised into three tagmata: the prosoma, the mesosoma and the metasoma, the latter two representing subdivisions of the opisthosoma. The prosoma supposedly includes, as mentioned above, the ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6. These segments are supposed to dorsally form the prosomal shield. Ventrally, (proximal portions of) appendages of post-ocular segments 1–4 form the feeding apparatus. Appendages of post-ocular segment 1, the chelicerae, are small pincers that can squash","PeriodicalId":9332,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"389-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolutionary history of body organisation in the lineage towards modern scorpions\",\"authors\":\"C. Haug, P. Wagner, J. Haug\",\"doi\":\"10.3140/bull.geosci.1750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Euarthropoda is extremely successful in evolutionary terms. Part of this success has been attributed to one evolutionary “strategy”: the stem species of Euarthropoda had a body with numerous segments, each of these segments bearing a pair of appendages, all of these subsimilar (e.g. Maas & Waloszek 2001; Haug J.T. et al. 2013, fig. 2.3.b, and references therein). Different lineages of Euarthropoda varied this ancestrally uniform body. Several adjacent segments were modified in groups, forming then functional units for specific needs. Such functional units, tagmata, may perform sensory functions, locomotion, feeding, respiration or other tasks. With this background we should expect that tagmosis, the subdivision of the body into several functional units, evolves within the different lineages of Euarthropoda, leading to very different patterns of body organisation between the different lineages as well as within one lineage (partly this morphological diversity or disparity appears to be a result of developmental plasticity, see e.g. Moczek 2010, Moczek et al. 2011, Minelli 2016 and references therein). Yet, in many lineages the pattern appears to be fixed already quite early within a lineage. For example, Euchelicerata, the group including spiders, scorpions and all their relatives, is generally thought to have a stereotypic tagmosis pattern. The ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6 are supposed to form the so-called prosoma; post-ocular segments 7–19 supposedly form the opisthosoma (see Dunlop & Lamsdell 2017 for a recent discussion). However, when looking closely at many eucheliceratan ingroups this is not quite that obvious or at least not as simple as often stated (see e.g. discussion in Haug C. et al. 2012a). Here we want to consider the evolution of the tagmosis in modern scorpions. Generally, modern scorpions have been considered to be organised into three tagmata: the prosoma, the mesosoma and the metasoma, the latter two representing subdivisions of the opisthosoma. The prosoma supposedly includes, as mentioned above, the ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6. These segments are supposed to dorsally form the prosomal shield. Ventrally, (proximal portions of) appendages of post-ocular segments 1–4 form the feeding apparatus. Appendages of post-ocular segment 1, the chelicerae, are small pincers that can squash\",\"PeriodicalId\":9332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"389-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1750\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

真节肢动物在进化方面非常成功。这一成功部分归功于一种进化“策略”:真节肢动物的茎物种有一个有许多节段的身体,每个节段都有一对附属物,所有这些都是亚相似的(例如,Maas&Waloszek 2001;Haug J.T.等人2013,图2.3.b,以及其中的参考文献)。节肢动物门的不同谱系改变了这种祖先一致的身体。几个相邻的部分被分组修改,形成了满足特定需求的功能单元。这种功能单元,tagmata,可以执行感觉功能、运动、进食、呼吸或其他任务。在这种背景下,我们应该预料到,将身体细分为几个功能单元的tagmosis在真节肢动物的不同谱系中进化,导致不同谱系之间以及一个谱系内的身体组织模式非常不同(这种形态多样性或差异在一定程度上似乎是发育可塑性的结果,参见例如Moczek 2010、Moczek等人2011、Minelli 2016及其参考文献)。然而,在许多谱系中,这种模式似乎在一个谱系中很早就已经固定下来了。例如,包括蜘蛛、蝎子及其所有亲属在内的真角藻目,通常被认为具有刻板的连茎模式。眼段和眼后段1-6被认为形成了所谓的韵律;据推测,眼后节段7-19形成了阿片细胞瘤(最近的讨论见Dunlop&Lamsdell 2017)。然而,当仔细观察许多真螺旋龙类群时,这并不像通常所说的那样明显,或者至少没有那么简单(例如,参见Haug C.等人2012a中的讨论)。在这里,我们想考虑一下现代蝎子的塔莫西的进化。一般来说,现代蝎子被认为分为三个塔格马塔:前瘤、中瘤和交代瘤,后两个代表阿片细胞瘤的细分。如上所述,韵律瘤应该包括眼段和眼后段1-6。这些节段应该在背侧形成韵律屏障。在腹侧,眼后节1-4的附肢(的近端部分)形成进食器。眼后第1节的附件,螯肌科,是可以挤压的小钳子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The evolutionary history of body organisation in the lineage towards modern scorpions
Euarthropoda is extremely successful in evolutionary terms. Part of this success has been attributed to one evolutionary “strategy”: the stem species of Euarthropoda had a body with numerous segments, each of these segments bearing a pair of appendages, all of these subsimilar (e.g. Maas & Waloszek 2001; Haug J.T. et al. 2013, fig. 2.3.b, and references therein). Different lineages of Euarthropoda varied this ancestrally uniform body. Several adjacent segments were modified in groups, forming then functional units for specific needs. Such functional units, tagmata, may perform sensory functions, locomotion, feeding, respiration or other tasks. With this background we should expect that tagmosis, the subdivision of the body into several functional units, evolves within the different lineages of Euarthropoda, leading to very different patterns of body organisation between the different lineages as well as within one lineage (partly this morphological diversity or disparity appears to be a result of developmental plasticity, see e.g. Moczek 2010, Moczek et al. 2011, Minelli 2016 and references therein). Yet, in many lineages the pattern appears to be fixed already quite early within a lineage. For example, Euchelicerata, the group including spiders, scorpions and all their relatives, is generally thought to have a stereotypic tagmosis pattern. The ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6 are supposed to form the so-called prosoma; post-ocular segments 7–19 supposedly form the opisthosoma (see Dunlop & Lamsdell 2017 for a recent discussion). However, when looking closely at many eucheliceratan ingroups this is not quite that obvious or at least not as simple as often stated (see e.g. discussion in Haug C. et al. 2012a). Here we want to consider the evolution of the tagmosis in modern scorpions. Generally, modern scorpions have been considered to be organised into three tagmata: the prosoma, the mesosoma and the metasoma, the latter two representing subdivisions of the opisthosoma. The prosoma supposedly includes, as mentioned above, the ocular segment and post-ocular segments 1–6. These segments are supposed to dorsally form the prosomal shield. Ventrally, (proximal portions of) appendages of post-ocular segments 1–4 form the feeding apparatus. Appendages of post-ocular segment 1, the chelicerae, are small pincers that can squash
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Geosciences
Bulletin of Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Geosciences is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles, and short contributions concerning palaeoenvironmental geology, including palaeontology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, palaeogeography, palaeoecology, palaeoclimatology, geochemistry, mineralogy, geophysics, and related fields. All papers are subject to international peer review, and acceptance is based on quality alone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信