电子隐私指令在数据保留指令失效后对国家数据保留措施的适用性

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
Nina Gumzej
{"title":"电子隐私指令在数据保留指令失效后对国家数据保留措施的适用性","authors":"Nina Gumzej","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses rules pertinent for examination of national data retention\nmeasures regulating data processing activities of providers of electronic communication\nservices following invalidation of the Data Retention Directive in 2014, on which subject the\nCJEU issued a total of five judgments up until June 2021. Focus of this analysis is the issue\nof applicability of EU law as interpreted in the CJEU case law, most specifically Article 15,\nparagraph 1 of the ePrivacy Directive containing legal safeguards for the restrictions of\nrights and obligations in that directive on the confidentiality of communications as well as\nthe processing of traffic and location data. Such restrictions are as a rule manifested in\ndifferent national data retention measures, which may pursue law enforcement and public\nsecurity, as well as national security objectives. This examination is supported also by\nanalysis of rules on the scope of ePrivacy Directive and its relationship with the general\npersonal data protection framework. Overall findings in the paper provide a frame for\nfurther detailed research on the topic of future regulation of retention measures at\nnational/EU level (Proposal for ePrivacy Regulation, possible new EU data retention\nlegislation) and a comparative assessment of relevant CJEU jurisprudence with that of the\nEuropean Court of Human Rights in respect of compatibility of retention measures with the\nguarantees of fundamental rights and freedoms and allowed restrictions thereof in the\nEuropean legal system.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of ePrivacy Directive to national data retention measures\\nfollowing invalidation of the Data Retention Directive\",\"authors\":\"Nina Gumzej\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyses rules pertinent for examination of national data retention\\nmeasures regulating data processing activities of providers of electronic communication\\nservices following invalidation of the Data Retention Directive in 2014, on which subject the\\nCJEU issued a total of five judgments up until June 2021. Focus of this analysis is the issue\\nof applicability of EU law as interpreted in the CJEU case law, most specifically Article 15,\\nparagraph 1 of the ePrivacy Directive containing legal safeguards for the restrictions of\\nrights and obligations in that directive on the confidentiality of communications as well as\\nthe processing of traffic and location data. Such restrictions are as a rule manifested in\\ndifferent national data retention measures, which may pursue law enforcement and public\\nsecurity, as well as national security objectives. This examination is supported also by\\nanalysis of rules on the scope of ePrivacy Directive and its relationship with the general\\npersonal data protection framework. Overall findings in the paper provide a frame for\\nfurther detailed research on the topic of future regulation of retention measures at\\nnational/EU level (Proposal for ePrivacy Regulation, possible new EU data retention\\nlegislation) and a comparative assessment of relevant CJEU jurisprudence with that of the\\nEuropean Court of Human Rights in respect of compatibility of retention measures with the\\nguarantees of fundamental rights and freedoms and allowed restrictions thereof in the\\nEuropean legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了2014年《数据保留指令》失效后,监管电子通信服务提供商数据处理活动的国家数据保留措施的相关审查规则,截至2021年6月,JEU共发布了五项判决。本分析的重点是欧盟法院判例法中解释的欧盟法律的适用性问题,特别是电子隐私指令第15条第1款,其中包含该指令中关于通信保密以及交通和位置数据处理的权利和义务限制的法律保障。这些限制通常表现为漠不关心的国家数据保留措施,这些措施可能追求执法和公共安全以及国家安全目标。对电子隐私指令范围及其与一般个人数据保护框架的关系的规则分析也支持了这一审查。论文中的总体研究结果为进一步详细研究国家/欧盟层面的保留措施未来监管主题(电子隐私监管提案,可能的新欧盟数据保留立法)提供了框架,并就保留措施与欧洲法律体系中对基本权利和自由的保障及其允许的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of ePrivacy Directive to national data retention measures following invalidation of the Data Retention Directive
The paper analyses rules pertinent for examination of national data retention measures regulating data processing activities of providers of electronic communication services following invalidation of the Data Retention Directive in 2014, on which subject the CJEU issued a total of five judgments up until June 2021. Focus of this analysis is the issue of applicability of EU law as interpreted in the CJEU case law, most specifically Article 15, paragraph 1 of the ePrivacy Directive containing legal safeguards for the restrictions of rights and obligations in that directive on the confidentiality of communications as well as the processing of traffic and location data. Such restrictions are as a rule manifested in different national data retention measures, which may pursue law enforcement and public security, as well as national security objectives. This examination is supported also by analysis of rules on the scope of ePrivacy Directive and its relationship with the general personal data protection framework. Overall findings in the paper provide a frame for further detailed research on the topic of future regulation of retention measures at national/EU level (Proposal for ePrivacy Regulation, possible new EU data retention legislation) and a comparative assessment of relevant CJEU jurisprudence with that of the European Court of Human Rights in respect of compatibility of retention measures with the guarantees of fundamental rights and freedoms and allowed restrictions thereof in the European legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信