一种新型手机应用程序在妊娠期糖尿病后2型糖尿病筛查中的验证。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2022-04-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-21-36
Helen B Gomez Slagle, Matthew K Hoffman, Richard Caplan, Philip Shlossman, Anthony C Sciscione
{"title":"一种新型手机应用程序在妊娠期糖尿病后2型糖尿病筛查中的验证。","authors":"Helen B Gomez Slagle, Matthew K Hoffman, Richard Caplan, Philip Shlossman, Anthony C Sciscione","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-21-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% <i>vs.</i> 25%, respectively; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"8 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Helen B Gomez Slagle, Matthew K Hoffman, Richard Caplan, Philip Shlossman, Anthony C Sciscione\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth-21-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% <i>vs.</i> 25%, respectively; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景我们试图确定通过基于文本的护理使用空腹血糖(FBG)与亲自进行2小时口服糖耐量测试(2hrOGTT)相比,是否是产后2型糖尿病的有效筛查工具。患者被纳入标准的、基于办公室的2小时OGTT,并结合基于文本的远程糖尿病筛查。研究参与者被要求使用移动应用程序连续3天记录FBG。我们使用灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及精确的二项式95%置信区间来评估与2hr OGTT的一致性。结果共有446名被诊断为妊娠期糖尿病的患者符合纳入标准,其中239人参加了标准的基于办公室的筛查,207人参加了使用标准2小时OGTT测试和基于文本的远程FBG筛查的双重筛查。FBG值小于100 mg/dL具有100%的敏感性(86-100%)、86%的特异性(77-93%)和100%(94-100%)的阴性预测值以及71%(54-85%)的阳性预测值。与标准的办公室筛查相比,远程文本筛查的随访率明显更高(分别为48%和25%;P<0.001)。结论基于文本的筛查可能是办公室筛查的可行替代方案。一个使用FBG的基于移动的系统成功筛查了所有产后2型糖尿病患者,具有100%的敏感性和阴性预测值。远程远程健康筛查显著增加了2型糖尿病筛查的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus.

Background: We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).

Methods: This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.

Results: A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% vs. 25%, respectively; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信